Literature DB >> 28970289

Modifiable factors associated with patient-reported pain during and after screening colonoscopy.

Marek Bugajski1,2, Paulina Wieszczy2,3, Geir Hoff4,5, Maciej Rupinski1,2, Jaroslaw Regula1,2, Michal Filip Kaminski1,2,3,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Pain associated with colonoscopy is a major burden for patients. We investigated modifiable factors associated with patient-reported pain during and after colonoscopy.
DESIGN: This cross-sectional analysis included database records from 23 centres participating in a population-based colonoscopy screening programme in Poland. Colonoscopies were performed under three sedation modalities: none, benzodiazepine-opioid sedation or propofol sedation. We used Gastronet (a validated tool) to assess patients' pain during and after colonoscopy; pain was scored on a four-point scale (no, little, moderate or severe pain), with moderate to severe defined as painful. We used multivariate logistic regression models to estimate ORs for painful colonoscopy and calculated risk-adjusted ratios of painful colonoscopies per endoscopist and compared it to the mean rate.
RESULTS: Of 35 216 screening colonoscopies in 2014 and 2015 included in our study, 22 725 (64.5%) patients returned valid Gastronet questionnaires. The proportion of examinations described as causing pain during (after) the procedure was 22.5% (14.2%) for unsedated, 19.9% (13.5%) for benzodiazepine-opioid sedation and 2.5% (7.5%) for propofol sedation. Propofol sedation, higher case volume of endoscopists, newest endoscope generation and adequate bowel preparation were significantly associated with lower odds of painful colonoscopy. Pain scores after colonoscopy showed similar associations. Adjusted pain rates during and after colonoscopy varied 11 and over 23-fold, respectively, between endoscopists.
CONCLUSION: We identified several independent, modifiable factors associated with pain during and after colonoscopy, of which individual endoscopist was the most important. Dedicated training should be considered to decrease variability among endoscopists. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abdominal pain; colonoscopy; colorectal cancer screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28970289     DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-313905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  11 in total

1.  Effect of carbon dioxide versus room air insufflation on post-colonoscopic pain: A prospective, randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Feyza Gündüz; Haluk Tarık Kani; Shannon Chang; Esra Akdeniz; Fatih Eren; Yusuf Yılmaz; Yeşim Özen Alahdab
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.852

2.  Implementation of virtual reality technology to decrease patients' pain and nervousness during colonoscopies: a prospective randomised controlled single-blinded trial.

Authors:  Qizhi Liu; Yunhua Zang; Wei Zang; Wenpeng Cai; Weiwei Li; Ya'nan Guo; Cheng Xin; Xiaohuang Tu
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 5.410

3.  Randomized Controlled Trial of Polyethylene Glycol versus Oral Sodium Phosphate for Bowel Preparation in Unsedated Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Dong Yang; Ke Tao; Geng Chen; Luping Zhang; Qingying He; Hong Xu
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 2.260

4.  A pilot study of a novel variable-stiffness stylet for efficient colonoscope insertion with ex-vivo colon model.

Authors:  Daisuke Kikuchi; Ryusuke Kimura; Kosuke Nomura; Masami Tanaka; Yorinari Ochiai; Toshiro Iizuka; Shu Hoteya
Journal:  J Anus Rectum Colon       Date:  2019-07-30

5.  A meta-analysis of carbon dioxide versus room air insufflation on patient comfort and key performance indicators at colonoscopy.

Authors:  Ailín C Rogers; Dayna Van De Hoef; Shaheel M Sahebally; Des C Winter
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Viewpoints of the target population regarding barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in the Czech Republic.

Authors:  Radek Kroupa; Monika Ondrackova; Petra Kovalcikova; Milan Dastych; Tomas Pavlik; Lumir Kunovsky; Jiri Dolina
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  The Effect of Virtual Reality on Pain and Anxiety During Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Selda Karaveli Çakır; Sami Evirgen
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.852

8.  Efficacy of a small-caliber colonoscope for pain in female patients during unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Yasuhiko Hamada; Kyosuke Tanaka; Masaki Katsurahara; Noriyuki Horiki; Reiko Yamada; Junya Tsuboi; Misaki Nakamura; Satoshi Tamaru; Tomomi Yamada; Yoshiyuki Takei
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2021-06-17

9.  Autonomous Nervous Response During Sedation in Colonoscopy and the Relationship With Clinician Satisfaction.

Authors:  Alexander Hann; Sascha Gruss; Sebastian Goetze; Niklas Mehlhase; Stephan Frisch; Benjamin Walter; Steffen Walter
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-06-16

10.  The Colonoscopy Satisfaction and Safety Questionnaire (CSSQP) for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Development and Validation Study.

Authors:  Alicia Brotons; Mercedes Guilabert; Francisco Javier Lacueva; José Joaquín Mira; Blanca Lumbreras; María Dolores Picó; Julián Vitaller; Mariana Fe García-Sepulcre; Germán Belda; Javier Sola-Vera
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.