| Literature DB >> 28969676 |
Xinping Wang1, Jia He1, Heng Guo1, Lati Mu1, Yunhua Hu1, Jiaolong Ma1, Yizhong Yan1, Rulin Ma1, Shugang Li1, Yusong Ding1, Mei Zhang1, Qiang Niu1, Jiaming Liu1, Jingyu Zhang1, Shuxia Guo2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aims to investigate association between six single nucleotide polymorphisms(SNPs) in APOA1 gene and types of obesity with the risk of low level HDL-C in the pastoral area of northwest China.Entities:
Keywords: ApoA1; Interaction; Low HDL-C disease; Obesity; Polymorphism
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28969676 PMCID: PMC5625605 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-017-0581-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
The general characteristics between the control group and case group
| Characteristics | Control(843) | Case(424) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Male/female | 420/423 | 213/211 | 0.889 |
| Age, years | 44.35 ± 15.28 | 44.17 ± 15.05 | 0.805 |
| Height, cm | 161.10 ± 8.62 | 162.87 ± 9.28 | 0.001 |
| Weight, kg | 60.16 ± 11.65 | 67.76 ± 14.28 |
|
| Waist circumference, cm | 83.29 ± 10.83 | 89.37 ± 12.19 |
|
| Waist-to-hip ratio | 0.88 ± 0.08 | 0.91 ± 0.075 |
|
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 23.11 ± 3.77 | 25.43 ± 4.27 |
|
| TC | 4.56 ± 1.34 | 4.13 ± 1.16 |
|
| TG | 1.15 ± 0.84 | 1.99 ± 1.59 |
|
| LDL-C | 2.41 ± 0.97 | 2.26 ± 0.80 | 0.147 |
| HDL-C | 1.46 ± 0.33 | 0.87 ± 0.14 |
|
| Apolipoprotein A1 (g/l) | 1.43 ± 0.27 | 1.05 ± 0.22 |
|
| FPG | 4.65 ± 1.47 | 4.70 ± 1.76 | 0.640 |
| Smoker, n (%) | 211(25%) | 112(26.4) | 0.269 |
| Alcohol drinker, n (%) | 59(7%) | 26(6.1) | 0.321 |
| Systolic blood pressure, mmHg | 130.45 ± 23.62 | 132.55 ± 22.99 | 0.047 |
| Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg | 81.88 ± 14.12 | 83.29 ± 14.71 | 0.073 |
Values are presented either mean±SD or n (%). a: t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to obtained the P value for continuous variables, and a chi-square test was used to obtain significance for categorical variables, P < 0.05 significant
The genotypic and allelic frequencies between the case and control group
| SNP | Genetype/Allelic | Control | Case | OR | 95%CI |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs670 | AA | 12(1.4%) | 16(3.8%) | 1.00 | ||
| AG | 197(23.4%) | 114(26.9) | 2.62 | 1.059–6.465 | 0.037 | |
| GG | 634(75.2%) | 294(69.3) | 1.38 | 1.004–1.886 | 0.047 | |
| G | 1465(86.9%) | 702(82.8%) | 1.46 | 1.118–1.915 | 0.005 | |
| rs5069 | CC | 717(85.1) | 364(85.8) | 1.00 | ||
| CT | 126(14.9) | 60(14.2%) | 0.94 | 0.673–1.308 | 0.710 | |
| T | 132(7.8%) | 60(7.1%) | 1.12 | 0.813–1.532 | 0.500 | |
| rs5072 | CC | 416(49.3%) | 207(48.8%) | 1.00 | ||
| CT | 356(42.2%) | 187(44.1%) | 1.06 | 0.828–1.346 | 0.660 | |
| TT | 71(8.4%) | 30(7.1%) | 0.85 | 0.537–1.343 | 0.480 | |
| T | 498(29.5%) | 247(29.1%) | 1.02 | 0.851–1.223 | 0.830 | |
| rs7116797 | AA | 118(14.0%) | 49(11.6%) | 1.00 | ||
| AG | 393(46.6%) | 210(49.5%) | 1.29 | 0.886–1.868 | 0.190 | |
| GG | 332(39.4%) | 165(38.9%) | 1.20 | 0.817–1.753 | 0.360 | |
| G | 1057(62.7%) | 540(63.7%) | 0.96 | 0.808–1.138 | 0.630 | |
| rs2070665 | CC | 416(49.3%) | 207(48.8%) | 1.00 | ||
| CT | 355(42.1%) | 187(44.1%) | 1.06 | 0.530–1.350 | 0.650 | |
| TT | 72(8.5%) | 30(7.1%) | 0.84 | 0.530–1.323 | 0.450 | |
| T | 499(29.6%) | 247(29.1%) | 1.02 | 0.853–1.226 | 0.810 | |
| rs1799837 | AG | 11(1.3%) | 4(0.9%) | 1.00 | ||
| GG | 832(98.7%) | 420(99.1%) | 1.39 | 0.439–4.386 | 0.580 | |
| G | 1675(99.3%) | 844(99.5%) | 0.72 | 0.229–2.273 | 0.580 |
rs670-AA, rs5069-CC and rs5072-CC genotypes used as a reference genotype for obtaining the odds ratio calculations separated for each single nucleotide polymorphism
rs7116797-AA, rs2070665-CC and rs1799837-AG genotypes used as a reference genotype for obtaining the odds ratio calculations separated for each single nucleotide polymorphism
Binary logistical regression analysis was used to obtained P value, the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) to obtained the SNPs difference between case and control group with adjustments for nationalities, age and sex. P < 0.025 significant
Association of types of obesity with low HDL-C
| Types of Obesity |
| SE |
|
| OR | 95%CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| General obesity (BMI) | ||||||
| No | – | – | – | – | 1 | – |
| Yes | 0.988 | 0.235 | 17.711 | < 0.01 | 2.686 | 1.695–4.256 |
| Abdominal obesity (WC) | ||||||
| No | – | – | – | – | 1 | – |
| Yes | 0.655 | 0.211 | 9.648 | 0.002 | 1.925 | 1.273–2.910 |
| Abdominal obesity (WHR) | ||||||
| No | – | – | – | – | 1 | – |
| Yes | 0.495 | 0.198 | 6.271 | 0.012 | 1.640 | 1.114–2.416 |
P and OR values were obtained by binary logistical regression analysis with adjustments for age, sex, blood pressure, high TC, high TG, high LDL-C, smoker, drinker and FPG. P < 0.05 significant. General obesity(BMI): general obesity measured by BMI; Abdominal obesity (WC): abdominal obesity measured by WC; Abdominal obesity (WHR): abdominal obesity measured by WHR
Interactions of rs670 and types of obesity on Low HDL-C disease
| Variable |
| SE | waldχ2 | OR | 95%CI |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal weight*AA | – | – | – | 1 | – | – |
| General obesity(BMI)*AG | 1.267 | 0.484 | 6.853 | 3.548 | 1.375–9.159 | 0.009 |
| General obesity(BMI)*GG | 1.232 | 0.292 | 17.862 | 3.428 | 1.936-6.071 | < 0.001 |
| Normal WC*AA | – | – | – | 1 | – | – |
| Abdominal obesity (WC)*AG | 0.984 | 0.277 | 12.613 | 2.675 | 1.554–4.604 | < 0.001 |
| Abdominal obesity (WC)*GG | 0.918 | 0.198 | 21.447 | 2.505 | 1.698–3.696 | < 0.001 |
| Normal WHR*AA | – | – | – | 1 | – | – |
| Abdominal obesity (WHR)*AG | 0.735 | 0.278 | 6.997 | 2.086 | 1.210–3.597 | 0.008 |
| Abdominal obesity (WHR)*GG | 0.805 | 0.197 | 16.682 | 2.236 | 1.520–3.290 | < 0.001 |
*Interactions between rs670 and different types of obesity, the interactions were assessed by binary logistic regression analysis after controlling for potential confounders (sex, age, blood pressure, high TC, high TG, high LDL-C, smoker, drinker and FPG). P < 0.025 significant