| Literature DB >> 28969604 |
Yan-Feng Zhao1,2,3,4, Li Zhu5,6,7,8,9, Li-Jun Liu1,2,3,4, Su-Fang Shi1,2,3,4, Ji-Cheng Lv1,2,3,4, Hong Zhang1,2,3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidences proved the important roles of circulating IgA1-containing immune complexes (cIgA1) in IgA nephropathy (IgAN). Galactose-deficient IgA1 (Gd-IgA1) and glycan-specific IgG antibody have been identified as major components in cIgA1. Before, Gd-IgA1 was reported as a vital factor in IgAN, partly via of its pathogenic role to induce mesangial cells activation. However, we still lack direct evidences to clarify the biological effect of glycan-specific IgG antibody in IgAN.Entities:
Keywords: Galactose-deficient IgA1; Glycan-specific IgG antibody; IgA nephropathy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28969604 PMCID: PMC5623975 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-017-0722-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Nephrol ISSN: 1471-2369 Impact factor: 2.388
Fig. 1Verification of successful preparation of ddIgA1 and IgG-dd-IgA1 complexes. a Glycosylation status of IgA1 and ddIgA1 were detected by two lectins, SNA and VVL, which recognized sialic acid (SA), and N-Acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc), respectively. IgA1 molecules showed high binding capacity to SNA (blank column) and low binding capacity to VVL (filled column). In contrary, ddIgA1 showed low binding capacity to SNA (blank column) and high binding capacity to VVL (filled column). b Existence of dd-IgA1 (upper panel) and IgG (lower panel) in IgG-ddIgA1 complexes were tested by Western blot analysis. Both IgA1 and IgG were existence in IgG-ddIgA1 complexes of recruited individuals (lane 1–4). Isolated ddIgA1 (lane 5), IgA1 (lane 6) and IgG (lane 7) were used as references
Fig. 2The biological effect of IgG-ddIgA1 complexes on cultured human mesangial cells. IgG-ddIgA1 complexes from both patients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN-IgG-ddIgA1) and healthy controls (IgAN-IgG-ddIgA1) could induce mesangial cells proliferation (a) and up-regulated excretion of MCP-1 (b), IL-6 (c) and CXCL1 (d). The levels of mesangial cells proliferation induced by IgAN-IgG-dd-IgA1 were significantly higher than those induced by HC-IgG-dd-IgA1 (1.10 ± 0.05 vs. 1.03 ± 0.03; p < 0.001), while the levels of MCP-1, IL-6 and CXCL1 derived from human mesangial cells when treated by IgAN-IgG-ddIgA1 and HC-IgG-ddIgA1 were comparable (MCP-1: 3701.1 ± 2199.9 pg/ml vs. 3373.9 ± 1465.6 pg/ml, p = 0.528; IL-6: 103.2 (81.5–277.4) pg/ml vs. 143.9 (108.2–248.6) pg/ml, p = 0.315; CXCL1: 1762.3 ± 934.0 pg/ml vs. 1575.8 ± 582.3 pg/ml; p = 0.383). In addition, monomeric ddIgA1 (mddIgA1) and polymeric ddIgA1 (pddIgA1), IgG derived from healthy controls (HC-IgG) and IgG derived from patients with IgAN (IgAN-IgG) were used as controls