Literature DB >> 28969558

Neck Circumference and its Correlation to Other Anthropometric Parameters and Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC).

Alexei Volaco1, Clara Martinuze Martins2, Jessica Queiroz Soares2, Ana Maria Cavalcanti1, Simone Tetu Moyses3, Roberto Pecoits Filho1, Cristina Pellegrino Baena1, Dalton Bertolin Precoma1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Neck Circumference (NC) is an anthropometric measure to evaluate obesity. The FINDRISC predicts the risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus. Our aims were to identify the mean value of NC in individuals with higher (≥15 points) and lower FINDRISC and to establish cutoff values that indicate individuals with higher FINDRISC.
METHODS: It is a population-based, cross-sectional study representative of the city of Curitiba, Brazil. We studied individuals (>18 years), without diabetes mellitus, between August 2013 and August 2014. We evaluated anthropometric parameters, glycaemia, socioeconomic situation, chronic conditions, and their risk factors. In a sex-specific analysis, data are presented as mean and standard deviation. We performed Pearson's and Spearman's correlation between NC and the waist circumference, body mass index and FINDRISC. Receiver Operating Characteristic curves were estimated for NC and higher FINDRISC. Logistic regression models were built to analyze the association between higher FINDRISC and 1-SD increase in NC.
RESULTS: We studied 950 individuals (621 women) with a mean age of 47.4 ± 17.6 years and body mass index of 26.2 ± 5.6 kg/m2. The mean NCs were 34.1 ± 3.1 cm in women and 38.2 ± 3.5 cm in men. Mean NC was lower in women (33.7 ± 2.9 cm vs. 35.8 ± 3.2 cm) and men (37.7 ± 3.4 cm vs. 41 ± 3.6 cm) with lower FINDRISC (p <0.001). All the correlations with NC were significant (p ≤ 0.001). The area under the curve for NC and the higher FINDRISC was 0.702 (95% CI 0.653 - 0.752) for women and 0.762 for men (95% CI 0.679 - 0.845), determining the best cutoff value of 34.5 cm for women and 39.5 cm for men to discriminate individuals with higher FINDRISC. Fully adjusted odds ratios for higher FINDRISC per 1-SD increase in NC in women and men were, respectively 1.89 (95% CI 1.53 - 2.33) and 2.86 (95% CI 1.91 - 4.29).
CONCLUSION: NC is positively correlated to the body mass index, waist circumference, glycaemia, and FINDRISC scores in a population-based sample of adults. We identified the mean values of NC in higher and lower FINDRISC and established cutoff values for NC and higher FINDRISC. Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.org.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FINDRISC score; Neck circumference; anthropometric; body mass index; epidemic; waist circumference.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28969558     DOI: 10.2174/1573399813666171002113442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Diabetes Rev        ISSN: 1573-3998


  4 in total

1.  Neck Circumference Cut-Off for Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome in Nigeria.

Authors:  Taiwo Hussean Raimi; Bolade Folashade Dele-Ojo; Samuel Ayokunle Dada; David Daisi Ajayi
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 1.847

Review 2.  Neck circumference in relation to glycemic parameters: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Parvane Saneei; Farnaz Shahdadian; Sajjad Moradi; Abed Ghavami; Hamed Mohammadi; Mohammad Hossein Rouhani
Journal:  Diabetol Metab Syndr       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 3.320

3.  Neck circumference in Latin America and the Caribbean: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Patricia A Espinoza López; Kelly Jéssica Fernández Landeo; Rodrigo Ricardo Pérez Silva Mercado; Jesús José Quiñones Ardela; Rodrigo M Carrillo-Larco
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2021-01-26

4.  Clinical Usefulness of Anthropometric Indices to Predict the Presence of Prediabetes. Data from the ILERVAS Cohort.

Authors:  Marta Sánchez; Enric Sánchez; Marcelino Bermúdez-López; Gerard Torres; Cristina Farràs-Sallés; Reinald Pamplona; Eva Castro-Boqué; José Manuel Valdivielso; Francisco Purroy; Montserrat Martínez-Alonso; Pere Godoy; Dídac Mauricio; Elvira Fernández; Marta Hernández; Ferran Rius; Albert Lecube
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 5.717

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.