Literature DB >> 28969104

Sonographic Estimation of Umbilical Cord Cross-section Area and its Reference Value in Normal Pregnancy.

Khizer Hussain Afroze1, Subhash Lakshmi Prabha2, V Chandrakala3, M Deepak4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The routine antenatal sonographic investigations of the umbilical cord are limited for assessment of number of umbilical vessels and doppler evaluation of umbilical blood flow. With the advancements of the sonographic techniques it is now possible to have more detailed evaluation of umbilical cord. There exist only few literatures on assessment of umbilical cord cross-sectional area during pregnancy to provide a baseline reference value. AIM: To establish the reference intervals of cross-sectional area of the umbilical cord during gestation and to find the correlation of umbilical cord cross-sectional area with the foetal anthropometric measurements.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted among 214 normal pregnant women who underwent a routine antenatal sonogram during gestational age ranging from 24-39 weeks in the Department of Radiodiagnosis. The umbilical cord cross-sectional area was calculated at a plane immediately close to the umbilical cord insertion to the foetal abdomen. The following foetal parameters were studied: Biparietal Diameters (BPD), Head Circumference (HC), Abdominal Circumference (AC), Femur Length (FL), and Estimated Foetal weight (EFW). The relationship between foetal anthropometric measurements and umbilical cord cross sectional area was assessed using spearman rank correlation. The 5th, 10th, 50th, 90th and 95th percentiles of umbilical cord cross-sectional area were calculated for each gestational groups using polynomial regression analysis.
RESULTS: A statistically significant correlation was observed between cross-sectional area of umbilical cord with both gestational age and foetal anthropometric parameters. The mean age of study population was 25.08±3.5 years and the mean gestational age was 34.42±2.5 weeks. We observed a strong correlation between head circumference and umbilical cord cross-sectional area.
CONCLUSION: The mean umbilical cord cross-section area increases steadily with gestational age for up to 34 weeks and then it declines. Umbilical cord cross-sectional area can be easily measured and hence it can be included in routine antenatal sonographic evaluations to predict the perinatal outcome. Careful monitoring of the pregnancy is needed in case of abnormal cross-sectional area measurements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Interval values; Polynomial regression; Three vessels cord; Ultrasound

Year:  2017        PMID: 28969104      PMCID: PMC5620744          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/30251.10415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  16 in total

1.  Sonographic measurement of the umbilical cord and fetal anthropometric parameters.

Authors:  L Raio; F Ghezzi; E Di Naro; R Gomez; M Franchi; M Mazor; H Brühwiler
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.435

2.  Nomogram of Wharton's jelly as depicted in the sonographic cross section of the umbilical cord.

Authors:  F Ghezzi; L Raio; E Di Naro; M Franchi; D Balestreri; V D'Addario
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 3.  Sonographic findings of the umbilical cord: implications for the risk of fetal chromosomal anomalies.

Authors:  A Weissman; A Drugan
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 4.  Umbilical cord morphology and pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  E Di Naro; F Ghezzi; L Raio; M Franchi; V D'Addario
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.435

5.  Sonographic measurement of the umbilical cord area and the diameters of its vessels during pregnancy.

Authors:  C Barbieri; J G Cecatti; F G Surita; E F Marussi; J V Costa
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.246

6.  Effect of umbilical ring constriction on Wharton's jelly.

Authors:  S M Skulstad; M Ulriksen; S Rasmussen; T Kiserud
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 7.299

7.  Sonographic measurements of the umbilical cord in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes.

Authors:  A Weissman; P Jakobi
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  Relationship between sonographic umbilical cord size and gestational age among pregnant women in Enugu, Nigeria.

Authors:  Charles Eze; Mabel Ugwuja; Cletus Eze; George Ugwu; Kennedy Agwuna
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 0.927

9.  Sonographic measurements of the umbilical cord and vessels during normal pregnancies.

Authors:  A Weissman; P Jakobi; M Bronshtein; I Goldstein
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Further studies on the umbilical cord and its water content.

Authors:  J M Scott; R Wilkinson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.