Literature DB >> 28968680

Management of Arthropod Pathogen Vectors in North America: Minimizing Adverse Effects on Pollinators.

Howard S Ginsberg1, Timothy A Bargar2, Michelle L Hladik3, Charles Lubelczyk4.   

Abstract

Tick and mosquito management is important to public health protection. At the same time, growing concerns about declines of pollinator species raise the question of whether vector control practices might affect pollinator populations. We report the results of a task force of the North American Pollinator Protection Campaign (NAPPC) that examined potential effects of vector management practices on pollinators, and how these programs could be adjusted to minimize negative effects on pollinating species. The main types of vector control practices that might affect pollinators are landscape manipulation, biocontrol, and pesticide applications. Some current practices already minimize effects of vector control on pollinators (e.g., short-lived pesticides and application-targeting technologies). Nontarget effects can be further diminished by taking pollinator protection into account in the planning stages of vector management programs. Effects of vector control on pollinator species often depend on specific local conditions (e.g., proximity of locations with abundant vectors to concentrations of floral resources), so planning is most effective when it includes collaborations of local vector management professionals with local experts on pollinators. Interventions can then be designed to avoid pollinators (e.g., targeting applications to avoid blooming times and pollinator nesting habitats), while still optimizing public health protection. Research on efficient targeting of interventions, and on effects on pollinators of emerging technologies, will help mitigate potential deleterious effects on pollinators in future management programs. In particular, models that can predict effects of integrated pest management on vector-borne pathogen transmission, along with effects on pollinator populations, would be useful for collaborative decision-making. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America 2017. This work is written by US Government employees and is in the public domain in the US.

Keywords:  Culicidae; IPM; Ixodidae; conservation; vector-borne pathogen

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28968680     DOI: 10.1093/jme/tjx146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Entomol        ISSN: 0022-2585            Impact factor:   2.278


  5 in total

1.  Barriers to Effective Tick Management and Tick-Bite Prevention in the United States (Acari: Ixodidae).

Authors:  Lars Eisen; Kirby C Stafford
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 2.278

Review 2.  Control of ixodid ticks and prevention of tick-borne diseases in the United States: The prospect of a new Lyme disease vaccine and the continuing problem with tick exposure on residential properties.

Authors:  Lars Eisen
Journal:  Ticks Tick Borne Dis       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 3.744

3.  Biological control of Aedes mosquito larvae with carnivorous aquatic plant, Utricularia macrorhiza.

Authors:  Jannelle Couret; Marco Notarangelo; Sarashwathy Veera; Noah LeClaire-Conway; Howard S Ginsberg; Roger L LeBrun
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 3.876

4.  Seminal fluid proteins induce transcriptome changes in the Aedes aegypti female lower reproductive tract.

Authors:  I Alexandra Amaro; Yasir H Ahmed-Braimah; Garrett P League; Sylvie A Pitcher; Frank W Avila; Priscilla C Cruz; Laura C Harrington; Mariana F Wolfner
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 5.  A Review of Commercial Metarhizium- and Beauveria-Based Biopesticides for the Biological Control of Ticks in the USA.

Authors:  Cheryl Frank Sullivan; Bruce L Parker; Margaret Skinner
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 2.769

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.