Literature DB >> 28968474

Increasing Use of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fractures in Elderly Patients.

Sean S Rajaee, Dheeraj Yalamanchili, Naudereh Noori, Eytan Debbi, James Mirocha, Carol A Lin, Charles N Moon.   

Abstract

This study described surgical treatment patterns for proximal humerus fractures among elderly patients, focusing on reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), and evaluated how the type of fixation affects inpatient factors (cost, length of stay), transfusion rates, and patient disposition (home vs skilled nursing facility). With Nationwide Inpatient Sample data from 2011 to 2013, the authors identified patients 65 years and older who had proximal humerus fractures and divided them into 3 groups: (1) open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF); (2) hemiarthroplasty; and (3) reverse TSA. From 2011 to 2013, 38,729 surgically treated proximal humerus fractures were identified. The rate of reverse TSA increased 1.8-fold during this time, from 13% of operative cases in 2011 to 24% of operative cases in 2013 (P<.001). At the same time, the rates of hemiarthroplasty and ORIF decreased (hemiarthroplasty, from 28% to 21%; ORIF, from 59% to 55%). Although reverse TSA accounted for 32.2% of arthroplasty procedures for proximal humerus fractures in 2011, this value was 53.3% in 2013 (P<.001). In 2013, mean total hospital cost for reverse TSA was $24,154, which was significantly higher than that for ORIF ($16,269) or hemiarthroplasty ($19,175) (P<.001). In a multivariable model, patients undergoing reverse TSA were less likely than those undergoing hemiarthroplasty to be discharged to a skilled nursing facility (odds ratio, 0.75; P=.027). The national rate of reverse TSA nearly doubled from 2011 to 2013. As of 2013, reverse TSA replaced hemiarthroplasty as the most commonly performed arthroplasty procedure for proximal humerus fractures for patients 65 years and older. Patients undergoing reverse TSA were more likely than those undergoing hemiarthroplasty to be discharged home. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(6):e982-e989.]. Copyright 2017, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28968474     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20170925-01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  9 in total

Review 1.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Biomechanics and Indications.

Authors:  Caitlin M Rugg; Monica J Coughlan; Drew A Lansdown
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-12

Review 2.  Outcomes following arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Tony Antonios; Nik Bakti; Akshay Phadkhe; Abhinav Gulihar; Bijayendra Singh
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-07-24

3.  CORR® Synthesis: What Is the Role of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures in Patients Older Than 65 Years?

Authors:  Michael A Boin; Mandeep S Virk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Readmission, reoperation, and nonhome discharge rates in patients receiving surgical treatment for proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Kenny Ling; Kevin I Kashanchi; Taylor VanHelmond; Alireza Nazemi; Matthew Kim; David E Komatsu; Edward D Wang
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2022-03-07

Review 5.  Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fracture.

Authors:  Brandon J Kelly; Chad M Myeroff
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-04

6.  The financial burden of reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Timothy Wallace Packer; Sanjeeve Sabharwal; Dylan Griffiths; Peter Reilly
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2020-12-02

7.  How age and gender influence proximal humerus fracture management in patients older than fifty years.

Authors:  Akshar H Patel; J Heath Wilder; Sione A Ofa; Olivia C Lee; Michael C Iloanya; Felix H Savoie; William F Sherman
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-12-17

8.  More Adverse Events after Osteosyntheses Compared to Arthroplasty in Geriatric Proximal Humeral Fractures Involving Anatomical Neck.

Authors:  Felix Porschke; Julia Bockmeyer; Philip-Christian Nolte; Stefan Studier-Fischer; Thorsten Guehring; Marc Schnetzke
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  No change in reoperation rates despite shifting treatment trends: a population-based study of 4,070 proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Carl Bergdahl; David Wennergren; Eleonora Swensson-Backelin; Jan Ekelund; Michael Möller
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 3.717

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.