Literature DB >> 28968139

Biomechanical Comparisons Among Fastball, Slider, Curveball, and Changeup Pitch Types and Between Balls and Strikes in Professional Baseball Pitchers.

Rafael F Escamilla1,2,3, Glenn S Fleisig4, Dave Groeschner5, Ken Akizuki5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In professional baseball pitchers, pitching biomechanics have not been examined for the slider, and the only known study for the curveball and changeup examined limited kinetics. Moreover, no known studies have investigated pitching biomechanics between strikes and balls. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to compare pitching biomechanics in professional baseball pitchers among the fastball, slider, curveball, and changeup and between balls and strikes. It was hypothesized that pitching kinematics and kinetics would be similar among the slider, fastball, and curveball; shoulder and elbow forces and torques would be significantly lower in the changeup; and pitching biomechanics would be similar between balls and strikes. STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS: Among 18 professional baseball pitchers, 38 reflective markers were positioned on the body and each player threw 32 to 40 maximum effort pitches-consisting of the fastball, curveball, slider, and changeup pitch types-from a regulation mound to a catcher. The markers were tracked by 18 high-speed 180-Hz cameras, and data were processed and run through a computer program to calculate 25 kinematic parameters, 7 kinetic parameters, and 4 temporal parameters for each pitch type and for both strikes and balls. A 2-way repeated-measures analysis of variance ( P < .01) was used to assess pitching biomechanical differences among pitch type and pitch result (balls vs strikes).
RESULTS: During arm cocking, elbow varus torque was 8% to 9% greater in the fastball and slider compared with the changeup, shoulder horizontal adduction torque was 17% to 20% greater in the slider and curveball compared with the changeup, and shoulder anterior force was 13% greater in the curveball compared with the changeup. During arm deceleration, elbow flexor torque was 9% to 14% greater in the fastball compared with the curveball and changeup, and elbow and shoulder proximal forces were 10% to 14% greater in the fastball, slider, and curveball compared with the changeup. At ball release, forward trunk tilt was 16% to 19% greater in the fastball and curveball compared with the changeup, contralateral trunk tilt was 26% to 41% greater in the curveball compared with the slider and changeup, knee flexion was 18% greater in the changeup compared with the fastball, and the knee extended 7° more from lead foot contact to ball release in the fastball compared with the changeup. During arm cocking, pelvis angular velocity was 7% to 8% greater in the fastball compared with the curveball and changeup, and upper trunk angular velocity was 5% greater in the fastball compared with the changeup. During arm acceleration, shoulder internal rotation angular velocity was 6% to 7% greater in the fastball, slider, and curveball compared with the changeup, and ball velocity at ball release was 11% to 18% greater in the fastball compared with the slider, changeup, and curveball and 6% greater in the slider compared with the curveball. For all the kinematic, kinetic, and temporal parameters, analysis showed no significant differences between balls and strikes and no significant interactions between pitch type and pitch result.
CONCLUSION: Nearly all kinetic differences among pitch types occurred between the changeup and the remaining 3 pitch types. Shoulder and elbow forces and torques and injury risk were greater among the fastball, slider, and curveball compared with the changeup but were similar among the fastball, slider, and curveball. Body segment and joint positions were similar among all pitch types at lead foot contact and at maximum shoulder external rotation; however, at ball release, throwing a fastball and curveball resulted in greater knee extension and more forward and contralateral trunk tilt compared with throwing a changeup and slider. Movement speeds for the pelvis, upper trunk, and shoulder were greatest in the fastball and least in the changeup and were generally similar among the fastball, slider, and curveball. The timing of when pelvis, upper trunk, elbow, and shoulder velocities occurred among the fastball, slider, curveball, and changeup was similar, and no kinematic or kinetic differences were noted between throwing balls and strikes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results from the current study will help clinicians understand differences in pitching biomechanics in professional baseball pitchers among the fastball, slider, curveball, and changeup; the study provides limited insight into shoulder and elbow injury risk associated with different types of pitches.

Entities:  

Keywords:  balls; pitch results; pitching; professional baseball pitchers; strikes

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28968139     DOI: 10.1177/0363546517730052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  15 in total

1.  Baseball and Softball Pitchers are Distinct Within-Subject Controlled Models for Exploring Proximal Femur Adaptation to Physical Activity.

Authors:  Robyn K Fuchs; William R Thompson; Alyssa M Weatherholt; Stuart J Warden
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Exploring wearable sensors as an alternative to marker-based motion capture in the pitching delivery.

Authors:  Kyle J Boddy; Joseph A Marsh; Alex Caravan; Kyle E Lindley; John O Scheffey; Michael E O'Connell
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Grip strength is not related to increased medial elbow joint-space gapping induced by repetitive pitching.

Authors:  Hiroshi Hattori; Kiyokazu Akasaka; Takahiro Otsudo; Toby Hall
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-08-01

4.  A New Method for Evaluating Pelvic and Trunk Rotational Pitching Mechanics: From Qualitative to Quantitative Approaches.

Authors:  Yu-Chuan Lin; Paul Pei-Hsi Chou; Hwai-Ting Lin; Chia-Lung Shih; Cheng-Chang Lu; Fong-Chin Su
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Peak Elbow Flexion Does Not Influence Peak Shoulder Distraction Force or Ball Velocity in NCAA Division I Softball Pitchers.

Authors:  Nicole Bordelon; Kenzie Friesen; Anthony Fava; Hillary Plummer; Gretchen Oliver
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-01-17

6.  Movement System Dysfunction Applied to Youth and Young Adult Throwing Athletes.

Authors:  Ashley E Disantis; RobRoy Martin
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2022-01-01

Review 7.  Risk Factors of Shoulder and Elbow Injuries in Baseball: A Scoping Review of 3 Types of Evidence.

Authors:  Koya Mine; Steve Milanese; Mark A Jones; Steve Saunders; Ben Onofrio
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-12-17

8.  Shoulder and Elbow Range of Motion Can Be Maintained in Major League Baseball Pitchers Over the Course of the Season, Regardless of Pitching Workload.

Authors:  Michael H McGraw; Michael Vrla; Dean Wang; Christopher L Camp; John M Zajac; Dave Pearson; Alec A Sinatro; Joshua S Dines; Struan H Coleman
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-02-08

9.  Youth Single-Sport Specialization in Professional Baseball Players.

Authors:  Patrick S Buckley; Michael C Ciccotti; Meghan Bishop; Patrick Kane; Stephen Selverian; Dominique Exume; John D'Angelo; William Emper; Kevin B Freedman; Sommer Hammoud; Steven B Cohen; Michael G Ciccotti
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-03-20

10.  Preventing Tommy John Surgery: The Identification of Trends in Pitch Selection, Velocity, and Spin Rate Before Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Major League Baseball Pitchers.

Authors:  Benjamin C Mayo; Adam Miller; Michael J Patetta; Garrett R Schwarzman; Jeffrey W Chen; Marshall Haden; Erwin Secretov; Mark R Hutchinson
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-06-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.