Literature DB >> 28968065

Sorption of Fluorotelomer Sulfonates, Fluorotelomer Sulfonamido Betaines, and a Fluorotelomer Sulfonamido Amine in National Foam Aqueous Film-Forming Foam to Soil.

Krista A Barzen-Hanson1, Shannon E Davis1,2, Markus Kleber3, Jennifer A Field4.   

Abstract

During fire-fighter training, equipment testing, and emergency responses with aqueous film-forming foams (AFFFs), milligrams per liter concentrations of anionic, zwitterionic, and cationic per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) enter the environment. Because the behavior of zwitterionic and cationic PFASs in the subsurface is unknown, batch sorption experiments were conducted using National Foam AFFF, which contains anionic fluorotelomer sulfonates (FtSs), zwitterionic fluorotelomer sulfonamido betaines (FtSaBs), and cationic 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonamido amine (FtSaAm). Sorption of the FtSs, FtSaBs, and 6:2 FtSaAm to six soils with varying organic carbon, effective cation-exchange capacity, and anion-exchange capacity was evaluated to determine sorption mechanisms. Due to the poor recovery of the FtSaBs and 6:2 FtSaAm with published PFAS soil extraction methods, a new soil extraction method was developed to achieve good (90-100%) recoveries. The 6:2 FtSaAm was depleted from the aqueous phase in all but one soil, which is attributed to electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions. Sorption of the FtSs was driven by hydrophobic interactions, while the FtSaBs behave more like cations that strongly associate with the solid phase relative to groundwater. Thus, the sorption mechanisms of the FtSs, FtSaBs, and 6:2 FtSaAm are more complex than expected and cannot be predicted by bulk soil properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28968065     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b03452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  5 in total

1.  Limitations of Current Approaches for Predicting Groundwater Vulnerability from PFAS Contamination in the Vadose Zone.

Authors:  Matt Rovero; Diana Cutt; Rachel Griffiths; Urszula Filipowicz; Katherine Mishkin; Brad White; Sandra Goodrow; Richard T Wilkin
Journal:  Ground Water Monit Remediat       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 1.870

2.  Evaluation and Management Strategies for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) in Drinking Water Aquifers: Perspectives from Impacted U.S. Northeast Communities.

Authors:  Jennifer L Guelfo; Thomas Marlow; David M Klein; David A Savitz; Scott Frickel; Michelle Crimi; Eric M Suuberg
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 9.031

3.  Volatilization Potential of Per- and Poly-fluoroalkyl Substances from Airfield Pavements and during Recycling of Asphalt.

Authors:  Trevor P Bastow; Grant B Douglas; Greg B Davis
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.218

4.  Ideal versus Nonideal Transport of PFAS in Unsaturated Porous Media.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau; Bo Guo; Dandan Huang; Ni Yan; Ying Lyu
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 13.400

Review 5.  A Review of the Applications, Environmental Release, and Remediation Technologies of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances.

Authors:  Jay N Meegoda; Jitendra A Kewalramani; Brian Li; Richard W Marsh
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.