| Literature DB >> 28967750 |
Iva Lukac1, Joanna Zarnecka1, Edward J Griffen2, Alexander G Dossetter2, Stephen A St-Gallay3, Steven J Enoch1, Judith C Madden1, Andrew G Leach1,2.
Abstract
We have applied the two most commonly used methods for automatic matched pair identification, obtained the optimum settings, and discovered that the two methods are synergistic. A turbocharging approach to matched pair analysis is advocated in which a first round (a conservative categorical approach that uses an analogy with coin flips, heads corresponding to an increase in a measured property, tails to a decrease, and a biased coin to a structural change that reliably causes a change in that property) provides the settings for a second round (which uses the magnitude of the change in properties). Increased chemical specificity allows reliable knowledge to be extracted from smaller sets of pairs, and an assay-specific upper limit can be placed on the number of pairs required before adequate sampling of variability has been achieved.Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28967750 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00335
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Chem Inf Model ISSN: 1549-9596 Impact factor: 4.956