Literature DB >> 28967704

Reappraising the early evidence of durophagy and drilling predation in the fossil record: implications for escalation and the Cambrian Explosion.

Russell D C Bicknell1, John R Paterson1.   

Abstract

The Cambrian Explosion is arguably the most extreme example of a biological radiation preserved in the fossil record, and studies of Cambrian Lagerstätten have facilitated the exploration of many facets of this key evolutionary event. As predation was a major ecological driver behind the Explosion - particularly the radiation of biomineralising metazoans - the evidence for shell crushing (durophagy), drilling and puncturing predation in the Cambrian (and possibly the Ediacaran) is considered. Examples of durophagous predation on biomineralised taxa other than trilobites are apparently rare, reflecting predator preference, taphonomic and sampling biases, or simply lack of documentation. The oldest known example of durophagy is shell damage on the problematic taxon Mobergella holsti from the early Cambrian (possibly Terreneuvian) of Sweden. Using functional morphology to identify (or perhaps misidentify) durophagous predators is discussed, with emphasis on the toolkit used by Cambrian arthropods, specifically the radiodontan oral cone and the frontal and gnathobasic appendages of various taxa. Records of drill holes and possible puncture holes in Cambrian shells are mostly on brachiopods, but the lack of prey diversity may represent either a true biological signal or a result of various biases. The oldest drilled Cambrian shells occur in a variety of Terreneuvian-aged taxa, but specimens of the ubiquitous Ediacaran shelly fossil Cloudina also show putative drilling traces. Knowledge on Cambrian shell drillers is sorely lacking and there is little evidence or consensus concerning the taxonomic groups that made the holes, which often leads to the suggestion of an unknown 'soft bodied driller'. Useful methodologies for deciphering the identities and capabilities of shell drillers are outlined. Evidence for puncture holes in Cambrian shelly taxa is rare. Such holes are more jagged than drill holes and possibly made by a Cambrian 'puncher'. The Cambrian arthropod Yohoia may have used its frontal appendages in a jack-knifing manner, similar to Recent stomatopod crustaceans, to strike and puncture shells rapidly. Finally, Cambrian durophagous and shell-drilling predation is considered in the context of escalation - an evolutionary process that, amongst other scenarios, involves predators (and other 'enemies') as the predominant agents of natural selection. The rapid increase in diversity and abundance of biomineralised shells during the early Cambrian is often attributed to escalation: enemies placed selective pressure on prey, forcing phenotypic responses in prey and, by extension, in predator groups over time. Unfortunately, few case studies illustrate long-term patterns in shelly fossil morphologies that may reflect the influence of predation throughout the Cambrian. More studies on phenotypic change in hard-shelled lineages are needed to convincingly illustrate escalation and the responses of prey during the Cambrian.
© 2017 Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cambrian Explosion; coprolites; drill holes; drilling predation; durophagy; escalation; functional morphology; gut contents; healed injuries

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28967704     DOI: 10.1111/brv.12365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  11 in total

1.  Symbiotic fouling of Vetulicola, an early Cambrian nektonic animal.

Authors:  Yujing Li; Mark Williams; Thomas H P Harvey; Fan Wei; Yang Zhao; Jin Guo; Sarah Gabbott; Tom Fletcher; Xianguang Hou; Peiyun Cong
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2020-09-18

2.  Possible links between extreme oxygen perturbations and the Cambrian radiation of animals.

Authors:  Tianchen He; Maoyan Zhu; Benjamin J W Mills; Peter M Wynn; Andrey Yu Zhuravlev; Rosalie Tostevin; Philip A E Pogge von Strandmann; Aihua Yang; Simon W Poulton; Graham A Shields
Journal:  Nat Geosci       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 16.908

3.  Computational biomechanical analyses demonstrate similar shell-crushing abilities in modern and ancient arthropods.

Authors:  Russell D C Bicknell; Justin A Ledogar; Stephen Wroe; Benjamin C Gutzler; Winsor H Watson; John R Paterson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Biomechanical analyses of Cambrian euarthropod limbs reveal their effectiveness in mastication and durophagy.

Authors:  Russell D C Bicknell; James D Holmes; Gregory D Edgecombe; Sarah R Losso; Javier Ortega-Hernández; Stephen Wroe; John R Paterson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Mandibulate convergence in an armoured Cambrian stem chelicerate.

Authors:  Cédric Aria; Jean-Bernard Caron
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  Ecdysis in a stem-group euarthropod from the early Cambrian of China.

Authors:  Jie Yang; Javier Ortega-Hernández; Harriet B Drage; Kun-Sheng Du; Xi-Guang Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Injuries and molting interference in a trilobite from the Cambrian (Furongian) of South China.

Authors:  Ruiwen Zong
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  The rapid evolution of lungfish durophagy.

Authors:  Xindong Cui; Matt Friedman; Tuo Qiao; Yilun Yu; Min Zhu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 17.694

9.  Early Cambrian fuxianhuiids from China reveal origin of the gnathobasic protopodite in euarthropods.

Authors:  Jie Yang; Javier Ortega-Hernández; David A Legg; Tian Lan; Jin-Bo Hou; Xi-Guang Zhang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Fine-scale appendage structure of the Cambrian trilobitomorph Naraoia spinosa and its ontogenetic and ecological implications.

Authors:  Dayou Zhai; Gregory D Edgecombe; Andrew D Bond; Huijuan Mai; Xianguang Hou; Yu Liu
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.