Literature DB >> 28967117

How to write a Critically Appraised Topic: evidence to underpin routine clinical practice.

J Callander1, A V Anstey1, J R Ingram2, J Limpens3, C Flohr4, P I Spuls5.   

Abstract

Critically appraised topics (CATs) are essential tools for busy clinicians who wish to ensure that their daily clinical practice is underpinned by evidence-based medicine. CATs are short summaries of the most up-to-date, high-quality available evidence that is found using thorough structured methods. They can be used to answer specific, patient-orientated questions that arise recurrently in real-life practice. This article provides readers with a detailed guide to performing their own CATs. It is split into four main sections reflecting the four main steps involved in performing a CAT: formulation of a focused question, a search for the most relevant and highest-quality evidence, critical appraisal of the evidence and application of the results back to the patient scenario. As well as helping to improve patient care on an individual basis by answering specific clinical questions that arise, CATs can help spread and share knowledge with colleagues on an international level through publication in the evidence-based dermatology section of the British Journal of Dermatology.
© 2017 British Association of Dermatologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28967117     DOI: 10.1111/bjd.15873

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Dermatol        ISSN: 0007-0963            Impact factor:   9.302


  5 in total

1.  The prevalence of bacterial infections during cyclosporine therapy in dogs: A critically appraised topic.

Authors:  Endya J High; Thierry Olivry
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  The Effect of Manual Therapy Plus Exercise in Patients with Lateral Ankle Sprains: A Critically Appraised Topic with a Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Rocco de Ruvo; Giuseppe Russo; Francesco Lena; Giuseppe Giovannico; Christoper Neville; Andrea Turolla; Monica Torre; Leonardo Pellicciari
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Do mHealth applications improve clinical outcomes of patients with cancer? A critical appraisal of the peer-reviewed literature.

Authors:  Jemima Osborn; Anu Ajakaiye; Tim Cooksley; Christian P Subbe
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Covering patient's perspective in case-based critical review articles to improve shared decision making in complex cases.

Authors:  Louis-Rachid Salmi; Pierre Côté; Christine Cedraschi
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  The psychological impact of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis on patients' lives: a Critically Appraised Topic.

Authors:  P O'Reilly; C Kennedy; P Meskell; A Coffey; I Delaunois; L Dore; S Howard; B Ramsay; C Scanlon; D M Wilson; B Whelan; S Ryan
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 9.302

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.