Literature DB >> 28966988

Reduced Neural Recruitment for Bayesian Adjustment of Inhibitory Control in Methamphetamine Dependence.

Katia M Harlé1, Shunan Zhang1, Ning Ma1, Angela J Yu1, Martin P Paulus1.   

Abstract

Delineating the processes that contribute to the progression and maintenance of substance dependence is critical to understanding and preventing addiction. Several previous studies have shown inhibitory control deficits in individuals with stimulant use disorder. We used a Bayesian computational approach to examine potential neural deficiencies in the dynamic predictive processing underlying inhibitory function among recently abstinent methamphetamine-dependent individuals (MDIs), a population at high risk of relapse. Sixty-two MDIs were recruited from a 28-day inpatient treatment program at the San Diego Veterans Affairs Medical Center and compared with 34 healthy control subjects. They completed a stop-signal task during functional magnetic resonance imaging. A Bayesian ideal observer model was used to predict individuals' trial-to-trial probabilistic expectations of inhibitory response, P(stop), to identify group differences specific to Bayesian expectation and prediction error computation. Relative to control subjects, MDIs were more likely to make stop errors on difficult trials and had attenuated slowing following stop errors. MDIs further exhibited reduced sensitivity as measured by the neural tracking of a Bayesian measure of surprise (unsigned prediction error), which was evident across all trials in the left posterior caudate and orbitofrontal cortex (Brodmann area 11), and selectively on stop error trials in the right thalamus and inferior parietal lobule. MDIs are less sensitive to surprising task events, both across trials and upon making commission errors, which may help explain why these individuals may not engage in switching strategy when the environment changes, leading to adverse consequences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Addiction; Bayesian model; Inhibitory control; Methamphetamine dependence; Prediction error; fMRI

Year:  2016        PMID: 28966988      PMCID: PMC5621759          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2016.06.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging        ISSN: 2451-9022


  61 in total

1.  Orbitofrontal cortex is activated during breaches of expectation in tasks of visual attention.

Authors:  A C Nobre; J T Coull; C D Frith; M M Mesulam
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Trial-by-trial fluctuations in the event-related electroencephalogram reflect dynamic changes in the degree of surprise.

Authors:  Rogier B Mars; Stefan Debener; Thomas E Gladwin; Lee M Harrison; Patrick Haggard; John C Rothwell; Sven Bestmann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Anterior cingulate cortex responds differentially to expectancy violation and social rejection.

Authors:  Leah H Somerville; Todd F Heatherton; William M Kelley
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-07-02       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Characterizing stimulus-response functions using nonlinear regressors in parametric fMRI experiments.

Authors:  C Büchel; A P Holmes; G Rees; K J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Neuropsychological function and delay discounting in methamphetamine-dependent individuals.

Authors:  William F Hoffman; Meredith Moore; Raymond Templin; Bentson McFarland; Robert J Hitzemann; Suzanne H Mitchell
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  Meth/amphetamine use and associated HIV: Implications for global policy and public health.

Authors:  Louisa Degenhardt; Bradley Mathers; Mauro Guarinieri; Samiran Panda; Benjamin Phillips; Steffanie A Strathdee; Mark Tyndall; Lucas Wiessing; Alex Wodak; John Howard
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2010-02-01

7.  Higher cortical and lower subcortical metabolism in detoxified methamphetamine abusers.

Authors:  N D Volkow; L Chang; G J Wang; J S Fowler; D Franceschi; M J Sedler; S J Gatley; R Hitzemann; Y S Ding; C Wong; J Logan
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 8.  Corticolimbic dysregulation and chronic methamphetamine abuse.

Authors:  Kate Baicy; Edythe D London
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 6.526

9.  Heroin and cocaine abusers have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than alcoholics or non-drug-using controls.

Authors:  Kris N Kirby; Nancy M Petry
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.526

10.  Is avoiding an aversive outcome rewarding? Neural substrates of avoidance learning in the human brain.

Authors:  Hackjin Kim; Shinsuke Shimojo; John P O'Doherty
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  5 in total

1.  Proactive engagement of cognitive control modulates implicit approach-avoidance bias.

Authors:  Katia M Harlé; Jessica Bomyea; Andrea D Spadoni; Alan N Simmons; Charles T Taylor
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 2.  Driven by Pain, Not Gain: Computational Approaches to Aversion-Related Decision Making in Psychiatry.

Authors:  Martin P Paulus
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 13.382

3.  Bayesian computational markers of relapse in methamphetamine dependence.

Authors:  Katia M Harlé; Angela J Yu; Martin P Paulus
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 4.881

4.  Amphetamine disrupts haemodynamic correlates of prediction errors in nucleus accumbens and orbitofrontal cortex.

Authors:  Emilie Werlen; Soon-Lim Shin; Francois Gastambide; Jennifer Francois; Mark D Tricklebank; Hugh M Marston; John R Huxter; Gary Gilmour; Mark E Walton
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 7.853

5.  Temporally dynamic neural correlates of drug cue reactivity, response inhibition, and methamphetamine-related response inhibition in people with methamphetamine use disorder.

Authors:  Sara Jafakesh; Arshiya Sangchooli; Ardalan Aarabi; Mohammad Sadegh Helfroush; Amirhossein Dakhili; Mohammad Ali Oghabian; Kamran Kazemi; Hamed Ekhtiari
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.