Literature DB >> 28966696

Comparing Adoption of Breakthrough and "Me-too" Drugs among Medicare Beneficiaries: A Case Study of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors.

Inmaculada Hernandez1, Yuting Zhang1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: "Me-too" drugs are new pharmaceuticals with the mechanism of action of an existing drug and are considered less innovative than breakthrough drugs. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the adoption patterns of the breakthrough drug sitagliptin and the "me-too" drug saxagliptin differed; and to assess whether the patterns differed between Medicare stand-alone (PDP) and Medicare-Advantage Part D (MA-PD) plans.
METHODS: Pharmacy claims from a 5% random sample of Medicare Part D beneficiaries were used to identify all prescriptions filled for sitagliptin (breakthrough drug) and saxagliptin ("me-too" drug) between October 1, 2006 and December 31, 2011. The number of new sitagliptin and saxagliptin users by month and type of plan were plotted, and Bass diffusion models were constructed to estimate the rate of diffusion.
RESULTS: Sitagliptin had a longer adoption life than saxagliptin, and its adoption was quicker among MA-PD than PDP beneficiaries: it peaked at 51 and 66.7 months after its approval, respectively. However, the adoption of saxagliptin did not differ by type of plan: it peaked at 20.5 months in PDP and 22.9 months in MA-PD. At the end of our study, the market share of the innovative drug sitagliptin measured as the cumulative number of users since market entry was almost nine times higher than the "me-too" drug, saxagliptin.
CONCLUSIONS: The breakthrough drug sitagliptin had a much longer adoption life compared to the "me-too" drug saxagliptin, and the breakthrough drug sitagliptin was adopted quicker among managed care plans compared to PDP plans.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diffusion of Innovation; Medicare Advantage; Medicare Part D; Prescription Drugs

Year:  2017        PMID: 28966696      PMCID: PMC5614454          DOI: 10.1007/s12247-017-9277-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Innov        ISSN: 1872-5120            Impact factor:   2.750


  10 in total

1.  Comparison of statin adherence among beneficiaries in MA-PD plans versus PDPs.

Authors:  Kyoungrae Jung; A Marshall McBean; Jee-Ae Kim
Journal:  J Manag Care Pharm       Date:  2012-03

2.  Me-too drugs and me-too people.

Authors:  William H Eaglstein
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 10.282

3.  What is the value of 'me-too' drugs?

Authors:  Stephane Régnier
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2013-02-26

4.  Modelling the market uptake of new drugs following listing for subsidy in Australia. A report from the Drug Utilisation Subcommittee of the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee.

Authors:  D J Birkett; P McManus
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Managed care and the diffusion of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Bruce L Jacobs; Yun Zhang; Ted A Skolarus; John T Wei; James E Montie; Florian R Schroeck; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  How does drug treatment for diabetes compare between Medicare Advantage prescription drug plans (MAPDs) and stand-alone prescription drug plans (PDPs)?

Authors:  Mujde Z Erten; Bruce Stuart; Amy J Davidoff; J Samantha Shoemaker; Lynda Bryant-Comstock; Rahul Shenolikar
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  The January effect: medication reinitiation among Medicare Part D beneficiaries.

Authors:  Cameron Kaplan; Yuting Zhang
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Nation-scale adoption of new medicines by doctors: an application of the Bass diffusion model.

Authors:  Adam G Dunn; Jeffrey Braithwaite; Blanca Gallego; Richard O Day; William Runciman; Enrico Coiera
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Adoption of new drugs by physicians: a survival analysis.

Authors:  Francisco Javier Garjón; Ana Azparren; Iván Vergara; Borja Azaola; Jose Ramón Loayssa
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Does managed care affect the diffusion of psychotropic medications?

Authors:  Marisa E Domino
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 2.395

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Varenicline and Nicotine Replacement Use Associated With US Food and Drug Administration Drug Safety Communications.

Authors:  Ravi J Desai; Meghan M Good; Alvaro San-Juan-Rodriguez; Andrew Henriksen; Francesca Cunningham; Inmaculada Hernandez; Chester B Good
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-09-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.