Literature DB >> 28966331

Three-Year Major Clinical Outcomes of Angiography-Guided Single Stenting Technique in Non-Complex Left Main Coronary Artery Diseases.

Yong Hoon Kim1, Ae-Young Her1, Seung-Woon Rha2,3, Byoung Geol Choi2, Minsuk Shim2, Se Yeon Choi2, Jae Kyeong Byun2, Hu Li2, Woohyeun Kim2,3, Jun Hyuk Kang2,3, Jah Yeon Choi2,3, Eun Jin Park2,3, Sung Hun Park2,3, Sunki Lee2,3, Jin Oh Na2,3, Cheol Ung Choi2,3, Hong Euy Lim2,3, Eung Ju Kim2,3, Chang Gyu Park2,3, Hong Seog Seo2,3, Dong Joo Oh2,3.   

Abstract

There is limited long-term comparative clinical outcome data concerning angiography- versus intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in non-complex left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease treated with the single stenting technique in the drug-eluting stent (DES) era.The aim of this study was to investigate whether angiography-guided stenting is comparable to IVUS-guided stenting during 3-year clinical follow-up periods in patients with non-complex LM disease treated with the single stenting technique.A total of 196 patients treated with either angiography-guided (n = 74) or IVUS-guided (n = 122) PCI were included. The primary outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as total death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and non-target vessel revascularization (Non-TVR). To adjust for any potential confounders, propensity score (PS) adjusted analysis was performed.During 3-year follow-up, the PS adjusted Cox-proportional hazard ratio (HR) was not significantly different between the two groups for total death, cardiac death, and MI. Also, TLR and the combined rates of TVR and non-TVR were not significantly different. Finally, MACE was not significantly different between the two groups (HR: 0.63, 95% Confidence interval (CI): 0.33-1.17; P = 0.149).Angiography-guided PCI for non-complex LMCA diseases treated with the single stenting technique showed comparable results compared with IVUS-guided PCI in reducing clinical events during 3-year clinical follow-up in the DES era. Although IVUS guided PCI is the ideal strategy, angiography-guided PCI can be an option for LMCA PCI in some selected cases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drug eluting stents; Intravascular ultrasound; Left main coronary artery; Percutaneous coronary intervention

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28966331     DOI: 10.1536/ihj.17-115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Heart J        ISSN: 1349-2365            Impact factor:   1.862


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of clinical outcomes between intravascular ultrasound-guided and angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation: A meta-analysis of randomised control trials and systematic review.

Authors:  Yu-Ying Tan; Xia-Xia Man; Ling-Yun Liu; Hui Xu
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Use of intravascular ultrasound and long-term cardiac death or myocardial infarction in patients receiving current generation drug-eluting stents.

Authors:  Sang Yoon Lee; Ki Hong Choi; Young Bin Song; Taek Kyu Park; Joo Myung Lee; Jeong Hoon Yang; Jin-Ho Choi; Seung-Hyuk Choi; Hyeon-Cheol Gwon; Joo-Yong Hahn
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Short- and Long-Term Prognosis of Intravascular Ultrasound-Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis Involving 24,783 Patients.

Authors:  Qun Zhang; Bailu Wang; Yu Han; Shukun Sun; Ruijuan Lv; Shujian Wei
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Meta-analysis and systematic review of intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided drug eluting stent implantation in left main coronary disease in 4592 patients.

Authors:  Yue Wang; Gary S Mintz; Zhichun Gu; Yue Qi; Yue Wang; Mengru Liu; Xiaofan Wu
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 2.298

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.