Anita Saxena1, Ankush Desai2, Kedareshwar Narvencar2, Sivasubramanian Ramakrishnan3, Rajendra Singh Thangjam4, Snehal Kulkarni5, Ana Karina Jacques' E Costa2, Kalaivani Mani6, Amit Dias7, Ritesh Sukharamwala5. 1. Department of Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India. Electronic address: anitasaxena@hotmail.com. 2. Department of Medicine, Goa Medical College, Bambolim, Goa, India. 3. Department of Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India. 4. Department of Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal, Manipur, India. 5. Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital, Mumbai, India. 6. Department of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India. 7. Department of Preventive & Social Medicine, Goa Medical College, Bambolim, Goa, India.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) continues to be major public health burden in developing world. Echocardiographic screening in school children has shown that subclinical RHD cases are several times more than clinical cases. Recent reports have used World Heart Federation (WHF) criteria. Objective of present study was to determine RHD prevalence using WHF criteria in Indian children. METHODS: Children (5-15years) from randomly selected schools across four sites were included. After focused clinical evaluation, echocardiography was performed using WHF criteria in all children. Images/loops of abnormal cases were analyzed independently by an additional experienced cardiologist. Children with murmur and confirmatory echocardiography were categorized 'clinical RHD'; those with abnormal echocardiography alone were labeled 'subclinical RHD'. RESULTS: Among 16,294 children included, mean age was 10.8 ± 2.9years; 55.1% were males; 11,405 (70%) were from rural areas and 3978 (24.4%) were from government schools. We detected RHD by echocardiography in 125 children [prevalence: 7.7/1000 (95% CI 6.3, 9.0)]. Borderline RHD was present in 93 children (5.7/1000, 95% CI 4.6, 6.9), definite RHD in 32 (2/1000, 95% CI 1.2, 2.6), and clinical RHD in six [0.36/1000, 95% CI: 0.1-0.7]. On univariate analysis, older age, female gender, and higher waist circumference were associated while on multivariate analysis, older age (OR 1.18, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.26) and female gender (OR 1.61, 95% CI: 1.13, 2.3) were associated with RHD. CONCLUSION: RHD prevalence varies in different parts of India. Echocardiographic prevalence is several times higher than clinical and underscores importance of echocardiographic screening in community.
OBJECTIVES:Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) continues to be major public health burden in developing world. Echocardiographic screening in school children has shown that subclinical RHD cases are several times more than clinical cases. Recent reports have used World Heart Federation (WHF) criteria. Objective of present study was to determine RHD prevalence using WHF criteria in Indian children. METHODS:Children (5-15years) from randomly selected schools across four sites were included. After focused clinical evaluation, echocardiography was performed using WHF criteria in all children. Images/loops of abnormal cases were analyzed independently by an additional experienced cardiologist. Children with murmur and confirmatory echocardiography were categorized 'clinical RHD'; those with abnormal echocardiography alone were labeled 'subclinical RHD'. RESULTS: Among 16,294 children included, mean age was 10.8 ± 2.9years; 55.1% were males; 11,405 (70%) were from rural areas and 3978 (24.4%) were from government schools. We detected RHD by echocardiography in 125 children [prevalence: 7.7/1000 (95% CI 6.3, 9.0)]. Borderline RHD was present in 93 children (5.7/1000, 95% CI 4.6, 6.9), definite RHD in 32 (2/1000, 95% CI 1.2, 2.6), and clinical RHD in six [0.36/1000, 95% CI: 0.1-0.7]. On univariate analysis, older age, female gender, and higher waist circumference were associated while on multivariate analysis, older age (OR 1.18, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.26) and female gender (OR 1.61, 95% CI: 1.13, 2.3) were associated with RHD. CONCLUSION: RHD prevalence varies in different parts of India. Echocardiographic prevalence is several times higher than clinical and underscores importance of echocardiographic screening in community.
Authors: Santanu Guha; S Harikrishnan; Saumitra Ray; Rishi Sethi; S Ramakrishnan; Suvro Banerjee; V K Bahl; K C Goswami; Amal Kumar Banerjee; S Shanmugasundaram; P G Kerkar; Sandeep Seth; Rakesh Yadav; Aditya Kapoor; Ajaykumar U Mahajan; P P Mohanan; Sundeep Mishra; P K Deb; C Narasimhan; A K Pancholia; Ajay Sinha; Akshyaya Pradhan; R Alagesan; Ambuj Roy; Amit Vora; Anita Saxena; Arup Dasbiswas; B C Srinivas; B P Chattopadhyay; B P Singh; J Balachandar; K R Balakrishnan; Brian Pinto; C N Manjunath; Charan P Lanjewar; Dharmendra Jain; Dipak Sarma; G Justin Paul; Geevar A Zachariah; H K Chopra; I B Vijayalakshmi; J A Tharakan; J J Dalal; J P S Sawhney; Jayanta Saha; Johann Christopher; K K Talwar; K Sarat Chandra; K Venugopal; Kajal Ganguly; M S Hiremath; Milind Hot; Mrinal Kanti Das; Neil Bardolui; Niteen V Deshpande; O P Yadava; Prashant Bhardwaj; Pravesh Vishwakarma; Rajeeve Kumar Rajput; Rakesh Gupta; S Somasundaram; S N Routray; S S Iyengar; G Sanjay; Satyendra Tewari; Sengottuvelu G; Soumitra Kumar; Soura Mookerjee; Tiny Nair; Trinath Mishra; U C Samal; U Kaul; V K Chopra; V S Narain; Vimal Raj; Yash Lokhandwala Journal: Indian Heart J Date: 2018-06-08
Authors: Jean Jacques Noubiap; Valirie N Agbor; Jean Joel Bigna; Arnaud D Kaze; Ulrich Flore Nyaga; Bongani M Mayosi Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-11-19 Impact factor: 4.379