| Literature DB >> 28965958 |
Armando Chierchia1, Nino Chirico2, Lucia Boeri2, Ilaria Raimondi1, Giovanni A Riva2, Manuela Teresa Raimondi2, Marta Tunesi3, Carmen Giordano3, Gianluigi Forloni1, Diego Albani4.
Abstract
Neurodegenerative diseases, as Parkinson's disease (PD), involve irreversible neural cell damage and impairment. In PD, there is a selective degeneration of the dopaminergic neurons leading to motor symptoms. A common finding in PD neurodegeneration is the increase of reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to oxidative stress. To date there are only interventions to relieve PD symptoms, however progress has been made in the development of therapies that target the immune system or use its components as therapeutic agents; among these, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), which are able to express neuroprotective factors as cytokines, chemokines and angiogenic molecules, collectively named secretome, that accumulate in MSC culture medium. However, lasting cell-free administration of secretome in vitro or in vivo is challenging. We used the conditioned media from rat adipose tissue-derived MSCs (RAA-MSCs) to check for neuroprotective activity towards pro-oxidizing agents such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) or the dopaminergic selective toxin 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) that is commonly used to model PD neurodegeneration. When neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells were pre-conditioned with 100% RAA-MSC media, then treated with H2O2 and 6-OHDA, mortality and ROS generation were reduced. We implemented the controlled release of RAA-MSC secretome from injectable biodegradable hydrogels that offer a possible in situ implant with mini-invasive techniques. The hydrogels were composed of type I bovine collagen (COLL) and low-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid (LMWHA) or COLL and polyethylene glycol (PEG). Hydrogels were suitable for RAA-MSC embedding up to 48h and secretome from these RAA-MSCs was active and counteracted 6-OHDA toxicity, with upregulation of the antioxidant enzyme sirtuin 3 (SIRT3). These results support a biomaterials-based approach for controlled delivery of MSC-produced neuroprotective factors in a PD-relevant experimental context.Entities:
Keywords: 3D cell culture; Adipose mesenchymal stem cells; Hydrogel; Parkinson’s disease; Secretome
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28965958 PMCID: PMC5656105 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2017.09.014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Pharm Biopharm ISSN: 0939-6411 Impact factor: 5.571
Hydrogel composition.
| Hydrogel | Type I Collagen (COLL) (mg/mL) | Polyethylenglycole (PEG) 2000 (mg/mL) | Low molecular weight hyaluronic acid (LMWHA) (mg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|
| COLL/LMWHA | 1.2 | 0.0 | 2.5 |
| COLL/PEG2000 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 0.0 |
Fig. 1Dose-response patterns of SH-SY5Y cells to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) or 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA). Cells were exposed to the oxidant stimulus without (A–C) or after (B–D) pre-conditioning with RAA-MSC conditioned media (CM) for 24 h. Cell viability was quantified by MTS assay. **p<0.01 vs. control group; ***p<0.001 vs. control group; ****p<0.0001 vs. control group; ns: not significant (one-way ANOVA and Dunnett's test).
Fig. 2Concentration-dependent effect and specificity of RAA-MSC conditioned media (CM) against oxidative stress. (A). Dose-response to 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) 100 μM of decreasing dilutions of RAA-MSCs CM. SH-SY5Y were pre-conditioned for 24 h before challenge with the toxin for a further 24 h. Cell viability was quantified by MTS assay. (B) The CM from dermal fibroblasts was unable to prevent the oxidative damage triggered by 6-OHDA. ****p < 0.0001 vs. control group; ns: not significant (one-way ANOVA and Dunnett's test). (C) Dose-response pattern to H2O2 and ROS generation. SH-SY5Y cells were pre-conditioned for 24 h with RAA-MSC CM 100% and treated with DCFDA 10 μM to measure intracellular ROS levels. The fluorescence was quantified using a fluorescence reader. *p < 0.05 vs. control group; ns: not significant; two-way ANOVA, Tukey's post hoc test.
Fig. 3Cytocompatibility and antioxidant effect of conditioned media (CM) from hydrogel-embedded RAA-MSCs. (A) Metabolic activity of SH-SY5Y cells after 24 h incubation with CM from RAA-MSCs cells included in hydrogels. Statistical analysis was done considering αMEM without FBS as control. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test (mean ± SD, n = 5). *p = 0.0226 and 0.025, and ns: not significant. (B) Metabolic activity of SH-SY5Y cells exposed to hydrogel-embedded RAA-MSC CM, collected after 24 h conditioning followed by 24 h challenge with 6-OHDA. Results are mean ± SD (n = 12). Statistical analysis was done using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test: *p = 0.012; ****p < 0.0001. (C) Metabolic activity of SH-SY5Y cells exposed to hydrogel-embedded RAA-MSC CM collected after 48 h of conditioning. Cells were then challenged for 24 h with 6-OHDA. The results are mean ± SD (n = 12). Statistical analysis was done using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test: ****p < 0.0001. Flask: CM from RAA-MSCs grown in standard conditions without the hydrogel matrices.
Fig. 4Contribution to neuroprotection of the proliferative effect of conditioned medium (CM) of hydrogel-embedded RAA-MSCs (A). Concentration of DNA in the SH-SY5Y cells treated with CM quantified by Hoechst. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test (mean ± SD, n = 6). **p = 0.0011. (B) Metabolic activity of SH-SY5Y cells exposed to CM from hydrogel embedded RAA-MSCs collected after 48 h of conditioning. Cells were the exposed for 24 h to oxidative stress triggered by 6-OHDA 75 μM. The results are weighted on the relative cell proliferation compared to the control without FBS (mean ± SD, n = 5). One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey 's multiple comparisons test: ****p < 0.0001; **p = 0.0024 and 0.0023.
Fig. 5Western blotting to assess expression of antioxidant proteins. (A) Analysis of the expression of Hsp70. SH-SY5Y cells were pre-conditioned with RAA-CM 100% for 24 h. The bar graph shows the densitometric analysis of the bands relative to the expression levels of α-Tubulin; ns: not significant. (B) Expression of mitochondrial SOD2. SH-SY5Y cells were pre-conditioned as above. The densitometric quantification reported was normalized to the mitochondrial protein VDAC; ns: not significant. (C) Expression of Sirt1. SH-SY5Y cells were pre-conditioned as described. Densitometric analysis relative to α-Tubulin was ns: not significant. (D) Expression of mitochondrial Sirt3. SH-SY5Y cells were pre-conditioned with RAA-CM 100% for 24 h, then mitochondrial proteins were extracted and analyzed. The bar graphs show the densitometric quantification, relative to the expression levels of VDAC; **p<0.01, unpaired Student’s t-test. Each experiment was independently replicated twice.