L McLaughlin1, J McConnell2, S McFadden3, R Bond4, C Hughes5. 1. Centre for Health and Rehabilitation Technologies, Institute of Nursing and Health Research, School of Health Sciences, Ulster University, Northern Ireland, UK. Electronic address: mclaughlin-l16@email.ulster.ac.uk. 2. Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Scotland, UK. Electronic address: jonathan.mcconnell@ggc.scot.nhs.uk. 3. Centre for Health and Rehabilitation Technologies, Institute of Nursing and Health Research, School of Health Sciences, Ulster University, Northern Ireland, UK. Electronic address: s.mcfadden@ulster.ac.uk. 4. Computer Science Research Institute, School of Computing and Mathematics, Ulster University, Northern Ireland, UK. Electronic address: rb.bond@ulster.ac.uk. 5. Centre for Health and Rehabilitation Technologies, Institute of Nursing and Health Research, School of Health Sciences, Ulster University, Northern Ireland, UK. Electronic address: cm.hughes@ulster.ac.uk.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to determine the strength of evidence available in the literature on the effect of training to develop the skills required by radiographers to interpret plain radiography chest images. KEY FINDINGS: Thirteen articles feature within the review. Sample size varied from one reporting radiographer to 148 radiography students/experienced radiographers. The quality of the articles achieved a mean score of 7.5/10, indicating the evidence is strong and the quality of studies in this field is high. Investigative approaches included audit of participants' performance in clinical practice post formal training, evaluation of informal training and the impact of short feedback sessions on performance. CONCLUSION: All studies demonstrated positive attributions on user performance. Using a combination of training techniques can help maximise learning and accommodate those with different preferred learning types.
OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to determine the strength of evidence available in the literature on the effect of training to develop the skills required by radiographers to interpret plain radiography chest images. KEY FINDINGS: Thirteen articles feature within the review. Sample size varied from one reporting radiographer to 148 radiography students/experienced radiographers. The quality of the articles achieved a mean score of 7.5/10, indicating the evidence is strong and the quality of studies in this field is high. Investigative approaches included audit of participants' performance in clinical practice post formal training, evaluation of informal training and the impact of short feedback sessions on performance. CONCLUSION: All studies demonstrated positive attributions on user performance. Using a combination of training techniques can help maximise learning and accommodate those with different preferred learning types.