Literature DB >> 28965444

Intraoperative neuromonitoring alerts in a pediatric deformity center.

Maria Zuccaro1, James Zuccaro1, Amer F Samdani2, Joshua M Pahys2, Steven W Hwang2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) involves the use of somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) and transcranial electric motor evoked potentials (TceMEPs). In this retrospective study the authors examined the sensitivity and specificity of both SSEPs and TceMEPs during pediatric spinal deformity surgeries. METHODS The authors performed a retrospective quantitative analysis of data obtained in 806 patients (197 males and 609 females) treated from December 2011 until October 2015. All patients were diagnosed with scoliosis that was classified as one of the following: adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) (38%), congenital scoliosis (22%), or syndromic scoliosis (40%). Also, 53 patients underwent vertebral column resection (VCR). All surgeries were monitored by high-level neuromonitoring specialists and were performed with total intravenous anesthesia. Alerts were described as a decrease in amplitude by 50% or greater (bilateral or unilateral) in SSEPs, TceMEPs, or both. RESULTS True-positive alerts for TceMEPs were observed in 60 of the 806 patients (7.4%). True-positive alerts for SSEPs were observed in 7 of the 806 patients (0.9%). In contrast, there were no false-positive or false-negative outcomes. Only 1 case (0.1%) was reported with a permanent postoperative deficit. No reported false negatives or false positives were observed, and thus sensitivity was 100% and specificity was 93%-100% for TceMEPs. The rate of sensitivity was 13.2% and the rate of specificity was 100% for SSEPs. The breakdown of total alert was as follows: 6.6% in AIS cases, 24.5% in congenital scoliosis cases, and 10.2% in syndromic scoliosis cases. Neurological injury rates were significantly lower than in previous studies, as there were 0% for AIS cases (p = 0.12), 0.6% for congenital scoliosis cases (p = 0.17), and 0% for syndromic scoliosis cases (p = 0.07). One injury in a patient with congenital scoliosis occurred during a VCR procedure, which brought the injury rate to 1.9% (p < 0.005). IONM alerts occurred during 34% of rod/correction cases, 25% of thoracic screw placements, 20% of the osteotomies, 17% of the resections, 3% of the cage insertions, and 2% of the sublaminar wiring procedures. CONCLUSIONS The authors hypothesize that the results of this study will support the necessity, as a standard of care, of multimodality neuromonitoring during high-risk pediatric spinal deformity surgery because of the decrease in postoperative deficits. Their data suggest that the TceMEPs are more sensitive than SSEPs, but when used in combination, they offer the patient a level of safety that would otherwise not exist. Last, these findings support the notion that better outcomes are achieved with high-level IONM professionals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IONM = intraoperative neuromonitoring; PPV = positive predictive value; RSC = reversible spinal cord change; SSEP = somatosensory evoked potential; TIVA = total intravenous agent; TceMEP = transcranial electric motor evoked potential; VEPTR = vertebral expandable prosthetic titanium rib; intraoperative neuromonitoring; somatosensory evoked potential; transcranial electric motor evoked potential

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28965444     DOI: 10.3171/2017.7.FOCUS17364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  12 in total

1.  The impact and value of uni- and multimodal intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) on neurological complications during spine surgery: a prospective study of 2728 patients.

Authors:  Martin Sutter; Andreas Eggspuehler; Dezsoe Jeszenszky; Frank Kleinstueck; Tamàs F Fekete; Daniel Haschtmann; François Porchet; Jiri Dvorak
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Multimodal Intraoperative Spinal Cord Monitoring during Spinal Deformity Surgery: Efficacy, Diagnostic Characteristics, and Algorithm Development.

Authors:  Athanasios I Tsirikos; Andrew D Duckworth; Lindsay E Henderson; Ciara Michaelson
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 1.927

Review 3.  A practical guide for anesthetic management during intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring.

Authors:  Masahiko Kawaguchi; Hiroki Iida; Satoshi Tanaka; Naokazu Fukuoka; Hironobu Hayashi; Shunsuke Izumi; Kenji Yoshitani; Manabu Kakinohana
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Neurophysiological monitoring during neurosurgery: anesthetic considerations based on outcome evidence.

Authors:  Benjamin F Gruenbaum; Shaun E Gruenbaum
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.706

5.  Intraoperative neuromonitoring practice patterns in spinal deformity surgery: a global survey of the Scoliosis Research Society.

Authors:  Pinar Yalinay Dikmen; Matthew F Halsey; Altug Yucekul; Marinus de Kleuver; Lloyd Hey; Peter O Newton; Irem Havlucu; Tais Zulemyan; Caglar Yilgor; Ahmet Alanay
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2020-11-23

6.  Relevance of intraoperative motor evoked potentials and D-wave monitoring for the resection of intramedullary spinal cord tumors in children.

Authors:  Lukasz Antkowiak; Monika Putz; Ryszard Sordyl; Szymon Pokora; Marek Mandera
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 2.800

7.  Intraoperative neuromonitoring for scoliosis surgery: is there an end to justify the means?

Authors:  Jason Chui; Alana M Flexman
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 6.713

8.  Positional disappearance of motor evoked potentials is much more likely to occur in non-idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  M Rizkallah; R El Abiad; E Badr; I Ghanem
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 1.548

9.  Narcotrend-guided intraoperative care of a Trisomy 21 paediatric patient who underwent occipitocervical fusion.

Authors:  Evangeline Ko Villa; Dominic Villa; Rafael C Bundoc
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2020-02-11

10.  Clinical outcomes of posterior pedicle screw instrumentation without osteotomy in the management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Ning Li; Chen Xu; Ming-Kui Shen; Ming Luo; Jie Wang; Lei Xia
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.