Kerri M Winters-Stone1,2, Esther L Moe3, Cynthia K Perry4, Mary Medysky4, Rodney Pommier5, John Vetto5, Arpana Naik5. 1. Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA. wintersk@ohsu.edu. 2. School of Nursing, Oregon Health & Science University, Mailcode: SN-ORD, 3455 SW US Veteran's Hospital Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA. wintersk@ohsu.edu. 3. Department of Sports Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA. 4. School of Nursing, Oregon Health & Science University, Mailcode: SN-ORD, 3455 SW US Veteran's Hospital Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA. 5. Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE:Fatigue is a troublesome symptom for breast cancer patients, which might be mitigated with exercise. Cancer patients often prefer their oncologist recommend an exercise program, yet a recommendation alone may not be enough to change behavior. Our study determined whether adding an exercise DVD to an oncologist's recommendation to exercise led to better outcomes than a recommendation alone. METHODS:Ninety breast cancer patients, at varying phases of treatment and stages of disease, were randomized to receive the following: an oncologist verbal recommendation to exercise (REC; n = 43) or REC plus a cancer-specific yoga DVD (REC + DVD; n = 47). Fatigue, vigor, and depression subscales of the Profile of Mood States, and physical activity levels (MET-min/week), exercise readiness, and self-efficacy were assessed at baseline, 4, and 8 weeks. Analyses controlled for age, time since diagnosis, and metastatic disease. RESULTS: Over 8 weeks, women in REC + DVD used the DVD an average of twice per week. The REC + DVD group had greater reductions in fatigue (- 1.9 ± 5.0 vs. - 1.0 ± 3.5, p = 0.02), maintained exercise readiness (- 0.1 ± 1.1 vs. - 0.3 ± 1.3; p = 0.03), and reported less of a decrease in physical activity (- 420 ± 3075 vs. - 427 ± 5060 MET-min/week, p = 0.06) compared to REC only. CONCLUSIONS: A low-cost, easily distributed, and scalable yoga-based DVD could be a simple booster to an oncologist's advice that motivates breast cancer patients, even those with advanced disease and/or in treatment, to engage in self-care, e.g., exercise, to manage fatigue. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03120819.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE:Fatigue is a troublesome symptom for breast cancerpatients, which might be mitigated with exercise. Cancerpatients often prefer their oncologist recommend an exercise program, yet a recommendation alone may not be enough to change behavior. Our study determined whether adding an exercise DVD to an oncologist's recommendation to exercise led to better outcomes than a recommendation alone. METHODS: Ninety breast cancerpatients, at varying phases of treatment and stages of disease, were randomized to receive the following: an oncologist verbal recommendation to exercise (REC; n = 43) or REC plus a cancer-specific yoga DVD (REC + DVD; n = 47). Fatigue, vigor, and depression subscales of the Profile of Mood States, and physical activity levels (MET-min/week), exercise readiness, and self-efficacy were assessed at baseline, 4, and 8 weeks. Analyses controlled for age, time since diagnosis, and metastatic disease. RESULTS: Over 8 weeks, women in REC + DVD used the DVD an average of twice per week. The REC + DVD group had greater reductions in fatigue (- 1.9 ± 5.0 vs. - 1.0 ± 3.5, p = 0.02), maintained exercise readiness (- 0.1 ± 1.1 vs. - 0.3 ± 1.3; p = 0.03), and reported less of a decrease in physical activity (- 420 ± 3075 vs. - 427 ± 5060 MET-min/week, p = 0.06) compared to REC only. CONCLUSIONS: A low-cost, easily distributed, and scalable yoga-based DVD could be a simple booster to an oncologist's advice that motivates breast cancerpatients, even those with advanced disease and/or in treatment, to engage in self-care, e.g., exercise, to manage fatigue. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03120819.
Entities:
Keywords:
Behavior change; Cancer survivor; Physical activity; Self-management; Symptom management
Authors: Kathryn H Schmitz; Kerry S Courneya; Charles Matthews; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Daniel A Galvão; Bernardine M Pinto; Melinda L Irwin; Kathleen Y Wolin; Roanne J Segal; Alejandro Lucia; Carole M Schneider; Vivian E von Gruenigen; Anna L Schwartz Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Justin C Brown; Tania B Huedo-Medina; Linda S Pescatello; Shannon M Pescatello; Rebecca A Ferrer; Blair T Johnson Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2010-11-04 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Sally A D Romero; Lee Jones; Joshua M Bauml; Q Susan Li; Roger B Cohen; Jun J Mao Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-04-19 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: D Santa Mina; C M Sabiston; D Au; A J Fong; L C Capozzi; D Langelier; M Chasen; J Chiarotto; J R Tomasone; J M Jones; E Chang; S N Culos-Reed Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2018-04-30 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Meagan O'Neill; Dominic Samaroo; Christian Lopez; George Tomlinson; Daniel Santa Mina; Catherine Sabiston; Nicole Culos-Reed; Shabbir M H Alibhai Journal: Integr Cancer Ther Date: 2020 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 3.279
Authors: Jamie M Faro; Kristin M Mattocks; Dalton Mourao; Catherine S Nagawa; Stephenie C Lemon; Bo Wang; Sarah L Cutrona; Rajani S Sadasivam Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2021-04-17 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Margaret I Fitch; Raymond J Chan; Imogen Ramsey; Alexandre Chan; Andreas Charalambous; Yin Ting Cheung; H S Darling; Lawson Eng; Lisa Grech; Nicolas H Hart; Deborah Kirk; Sandra A Mitchell; Dagmara Poprawski; Elke Rammant Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2022-09-29 Impact factor: 3.359
Authors: Kelly A Hirko; Joan M Dorn; James W Dearing; Catherine M Alfano; Annemarie Wigton; Kathryn H Schmitz Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-07 Impact factor: 3.390