Justin P Wagner1, Amalia L Cochran2, Christian Jones3, Niraj J Gusani4, Thomas K Varghese5, Deanna J Attai6. 1. Department of Pediatric Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska. 2. Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah. 3. Division of Acute Care Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 4. Department of Surgery, Program for Liver, Pancreas, and Foregut Tumors, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania. 5. Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah. 6. Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, UCLA Health Burbank Breast Care, Burbank, California. Electronic address: dattai@mednet.ucla.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Among surgeons, professional use of social media (SM) is varied, and attitudes are ambiguous. We sought to characterize surgeons' professional use and perceptions of SM. DESIGN: Surgical faculty and trainees received institutional review board-approved e-mail surveys assessing SM usage and attitudes. Regression analyses identified predictors of SM attitudes and preference for professional contact. SETTING: Surveys were administered to surgical faculty, fellows, and residents at 4 academic medical centers between January and April 2016. PARTICIPANTS: Of 1037 surgeons, clinical fellows, and residents e-mailed, 208 (20%) responded, including 132 faculty and 76 trainees. RESULTS: Among 208 respondents, 46 (22%) indicated they preferred some form of SM as their preferred networking and communication modality. A total of 145 (70%) indicated they believe SM benefits professional development. The position of clinical resident predicted preference to maintain professional contact via SM (p = 0.03). Age <55 predicted positive attitude (p = 0.02) and rank of associate professor predicted negative attitude toward SM (p = 0.03). Lack of time as well as personal and patient privacy concerns were cited most commonly as reasons for not using SM. CONCLUSIONS: Most of surgeons responding to our survey used some form of SM for professional purposes. Perceived barriers include lack of value, time constraints, and personal and patient privacy concerns. Generational differences in surgeon attitudes suggest usage of SM among surgeons will expand over time.
OBJECTIVE: Among surgeons, professional use of social media (SM) is varied, and attitudes are ambiguous. We sought to characterize surgeons' professional use and perceptions of SM. DESIGN: Surgical faculty and trainees received institutional review board-approved e-mail surveys assessing SM usage and attitudes. Regression analyses identified predictors of SM attitudes and preference for professional contact. SETTING: Surveys were administered to surgical faculty, fellows, and residents at 4 academic medical centers between January and April 2016. PARTICIPANTS: Of 1037 surgeons, clinical fellows, and residents e-mailed, 208 (20%) responded, including 132 faculty and 76 trainees. RESULTS: Among 208 respondents, 46 (22%) indicated they preferred some form of SM as their preferred networking and communication modality. A total of 145 (70%) indicated they believe SM benefits professional development. The position of clinical resident predicted preference to maintain professional contact via SM (p = 0.03). Age <55 predicted positive attitude (p = 0.02) and rank of associate professor predicted negative attitude toward SM (p = 0.03). Lack of time as well as personal and patient privacy concerns were cited most commonly as reasons for not using SM. CONCLUSIONS: Most of surgeons responding to our survey used some form of SM for professional purposes. Perceived barriers include lack of value, time constraints, and personal and patient privacy concerns. Generational differences in surgeon attitudes suggest usage of SM among surgeons will expand over time.
Authors: Thomas K Varghese; John W Entwistle; John E Mayer; Susan D Moffatt-Bruce; Robert M Sade Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2019-06-28 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Deborah X Xie; Matthew M Dedmon; Brendan P O'Connell; Robert J Yawn; David S Haynes Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Methma Udawatta; Edwin Ng; H Westley Phillips; Jia-Shu Chen; Bayard Wilson; Giyarpuram N Prashant; Daniel T Nagasawa; Isaac Yang Journal: Clin Neurol Neurosurg Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 1.876
Authors: Jaime D Lewis; Kathleen E Fane; Angela M Ingraham; Ayesha Khan; Anne M Mills; Susan C Pitt; Danielle Ramo; Roseann I Wu; Susan M Pollart Journal: JMIR Med Educ Date: 2018-07-23