Literature DB >> 28964288

The value of intraoperative EABRs in auditory brainstem implantation.

Abbas Anwar1, Alison Singleton2, Yixin Fang2, Binhuan Wang2, William Shapiro2, J Thomas Roland2, Susan B Waltzman2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the intraoperative electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR) morphologies between neurofibromatosis II (NF2) adult auditory brainstem implant (ABI) recipients who had auditory percepts post-operatively and those who did not and between NF2 adult ABI recipients and non-NF2 pediatric ABI recipients.
METHODS: This was a retrospective case series at a single tertiary academic referral center examining all ABI recipients from 1994 to 2016, which included 34 NF2 adults and 11 non-NF2 children. The morphologies of intraoperative EABRs were evaluated for the number of waveforms showing a response, the number of positive peaks in those responses, and the latencies of each of these peaks.
RESULTS: 27/34 adult NF2 patients and 9/10 children had EABR waveforms. 20/27 (74.0%) of the adult patients and all of the children had ABI devices that stimulated post-operatively. When comparing the waveforms between adults who stimulated and those who did not stimulate, the proportion of total number of intraoperative EABR peaks to total possible peaks was significantly higher for the adults who stimulated than for those who did not (p < 0.05). Children had a significantly higher proportion of total number of peaks to total possible peaks when compared to adults who stimulated (p < 0.02). Additionally, there were more likely to be EABR responses at the initial stimulation than intraoperatively in the pediatric ABI population (p = 0.065).
CONCLUSIONS: The value of intraoperative EABR tracing may lie in its ability to predict post-operative auditory percepts based on the placement of the array providing the highest number of total peaks.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ABI; Audiology; Auditory brainstem implantation; CI; Cochlear implant; EABR; Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response; Hearing restoration

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28964288     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  3 in total

1.  Auditory Brainstem Implants-Hearing Restoration in Congenitally Deaf Children.

Authors:  Robert Behr; Konrad Schwager; Erich Hofmann
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 8.251

2.  The sensitivity of different methods for detecting abnormalities in auditory nerve function.

Authors:  Tianhao Lu; Qiang Li; Chen Zhang; Min Chen; Zhengming Wang; Shufeng Li
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 2.819

3.  Novel microscope-based visual display and nasopharyngeal registration for auditory brainstem implantation: a feasibility study in an ex vivo model.

Authors:  Milovan Regodić; Christian F Freyschlag; Johannes Kerschbaumer; Malik Galijašević; Romed Hörmann; Wolfgang Freysinger
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 2.924

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.