| Literature DB >> 28963713 |
Agata Bartkowiak1, Joanna Lemanowicz2, Piotr Hulisz3.
Abstract
This paper aimed to evaluate the ecological risk posed by the accumulation of heavy metals in the salt-affected soils of the habitat covered by the EU Natura 2000 program in relation to the activity of soil redox enzymes. The research was carried out in the halophyte reserve in Ciechocinek (north-central Poland) which is a very specific habitat as it undergoes a long-term human impact related to both the operation of the medical spa town and the agricultural use of soils in the adjacent areas. The obtained results showed that the content of Zn, Cu, Pb, and Cd in the studied soils exceeded the Polish standards. Based on the obtained data and statistical analysis, it was found that metals may come from two different sources: emission from household boiler rooms (Pb, Cd) and corroded brine sewage pipeline (Zn, Cu).They are characterized by limited mobility due to alkaline environment and strong sorption properties of the clay fraction and organic matter. The correlation analysis indicates that the dehydrogenase activities were negatively correlated with soil electrical conductivity (EC1:5) (r = - 0.665, P < 0.05). Taking into account the protective status of the area, it is difficult to indicate definitely the solution concerning the land management. However, according to the authors, one should pay special attention to a possibility of using halophytes which occur within the reserve for phytoremediation.Entities:
Keywords: Enzymes; Halophytes; Heavy metals; Natura 2000; Soil salinity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28963713 PMCID: PMC5719806 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-0323-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 4.223
Fig. 1Localization of the study area
Basic properties of the studied soils
| Sample no. | pH | EC1:5 (dS m−1) | OC (g kg−1) | Percentage share of fraction | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H2O | KCl | Sand* | Silt | Clay | |||
| 1 | 5.5 | 4.6 | 2.47 | 33.8 | 83 | 16 | 1 |
| 2 | 6.8 | 6.4 | 2.54 | 21.7 | 81 | 18 | 1 |
| 3 | 5.8 | 4.9 | 2.31 | 13.4 | 76 | 22 | 2 |
| 4 | 5.5 | 4.3 | 1.89 | 25.4 | 63 | 34 | 3 |
| 5 | 5.7 | 4.7 | 2.59 | 70.6 | 32 | 60 | 8 |
| 6 | 5.4 | 3.9 | 2.11 | 69.8 | 41 | 51 | 8 |
| 7 | 5.5 | 4.8 | 2.68 | 34.8 | 21 | 66 | 13 |
| 8 | 7.5 | 7.4 | 9.25 | 38.9 | 61 | 34 | 5 |
| 9 | 7.6 | 7.4 | 10.2 | 36.3 | 41 | 53 | 6 |
| 10 | 7.5 | 7.3 | 10.9 | 41.2 | 45 | 50 | 5 |
| 11 | 7.7 | 7.3 | 9.89 | 60.5 | 30 | 55 | 15 |
| 12 | 7.6 | 7.8 | 14.5 | 24.6 | 64 | 33 | 3 |
| 13 | 7.1 | 6.4 | 13.6 | 124 | 52 | 43 | 5 |
| 14 | 7.3 | 7.6 | 4.75 | 19.6 | 17 | 72 | 11 |
| 15 | 7.5 | 7.2 | 2.01 | 29.8 | 52 | 40 | 8 |
| 16 | 7.6 | 7.4 | 15.2 | 40.0 | 48 | 47 | 5 |
| Mean | 6.7 | 6.2 | 6.68 | 42.7 | 50 | 43 | 6 |
| Median | 7.2 | 6.8 | 3.72 | 35.5 | 50 | 45 | 5 |
| Min | 5.4 | 3.9 | 1.89 | 13.4 | 17 | 16 | 1 |
| Max | 7.7 | 7.8 | 14.5 | 124 | 83 | 72 | 15 |
| SD | 1.0 | 1.4 | 5.06 | 27.4 | 20 | 17 | 4 |
| CV% | 14 | 23 | 76 | 64.0 | 40 | 38 | 68 |
*Sand [2.0–0.05 mm], Silt [0.05–0.002 mm], Clay [< 0.002 mm]
Relationship between selected soil properties (n = 16; P < 0.05)
| Variables | Equation |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dependent | Independent | ||
| Total copper | Organic carbon | y = 42.6643 + 35.987x | 0.688 |
| Total nickel | Organic carbon | y = 0.10634 + 2.0257x | 0.510 |
| Total lead | Organic carbon | y = 26.5859 + 50.6427x | 0.510 |
| Total zinc | EC1:5 | y = 36.6079 + 1.6333x | 0.668 |
| Total copper | EC1:5 | y = 1.8252 + 1.1061x | 0.509 |
| Dehydrogenases | EC1:5 | y = 0.4866–0.0032x | −0.665 |
| Total nickel | Clay | y = −0.6293 + 1.3467x | 0.678 |
| Total lead | Clay | y = −15.7324 + 33.6666x | 0.678 |
| Total zinc | pH KCl | y = −214.9774 + 58.1292x | 0.664 |
| Total cadmium | pH KCl | y = −1.2889 + 0.3112x | 0.510 |
| EC1:5 | pH H2O | y = −19.53 + 3.8975x | 0.736 |
| EC1:5 | pH KCl | y = −8.9739 + 2.5226x | 0.705 |
The content of total zinc, copper, nickel, lead, and cadmium and the activity of dehydrogenases and catalase in the studied soils
| Sites | Zn | Cu | Ni | Pb | Cd | DEH (mg TPF kg−1 24 h−1) | CAT (mg H2O2 kg−1 h−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (mg kg−1) | |||||||
| 1 | 23.2 | 7.48 | 1.26 | 31.6 | 0.35 | 0.121 | 0.031 |
| 2 | 32.7 | 7.66 | 1.29 | 32.2 | bdl | 0.632 | 0.121 |
| 3 | 25.0 | 9.33 | 2.09 | 52.2 | bdl | 0.547 | 0.042 |
| 4 | 32.0 | 9.60 | 3.58 | 89.4 | bdl | 0.516 | 0.053 |
| 5 | 87.8 | 29.2 | 21.2 | 531 | 0.16 | 0.558 | 0.064 |
| 6 | 81.5 | 23.3 | 15.4 | 385 | 0.41 | 0.095 | 0.039 |
| 7 | 77.2 | 29.3 | 21.0 | 525 | 0.16 | 0.154 | 0.076 |
| 8 | 94.1 | 225 | 3.88 | 96.9 | 1.25 | 0.119 | 0.087 |
| 9 | 344 | 102 | 1.15 | 28.8 | bdl | 0.096 | 0.032 |
| 10 | 420 | 74.1 | 0.44 | 10.9 | 0.49 | 0.091 | 0.029 |
| 11 | 112 | 16.3 | 17.4 | 436 | 0.30 | 0.106 | 0.026 |
| 12 | 231 | 26.9 | 1.06 | 26.6 | 3.49 | 0.085 | 0.021 |
| 13 | 144 | 432 | 13.2 | 329 | 0.93 | 0.095 | 0.035 |
| 14 | 269 | 59.7 | 0.68 | 16.9 | 0.89 | 0.289 | 0.048 |
| 15 | 82.2 | 76.1 | 18.8 | 470 | 0.90 | 0.781 | 0.298 |
| 16 | 275 | 82.4 | 1.15 | 28.8 | 0.94 | 0.049 | 0.019 |
| Mean | 146 | 75.7 | 7.72 | 193 | 0.64 | 0.271 | 0.063 |
| Median | 90.9 | 29.2 | 2.83 | 70.8 | 0.38 | 0.120 | 0.045 |
| Min | 23.2 | 7.48 | 0.44 | 10.9 | 0.00 | 0.049 | 0.019 |
| Max | 420 | 432 | 21.2 | 531 | 3.49 | 0.781 | 0.298 |
| SD | 124 | 110 | 8.35 | 209 | 0.86 | 0.245 | 0.070 |
| CV% | 85 | 145 | 108 | 108 | 134 | 91 | 107 |
bdl below detection limit
Fig. 2Enrichment factor
Coefficients and degrees of soil contamination
| Sites | CF | Cdeg | CF in Cdeg (%) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zn | Cu | Ni | Pb | Cd | Zn | Cu | Ni | Pb | Cd | ||
| 1 | 1.22 | 1.87 | 0.19 | 4.45 | 2.69 | 10.4 | 11.7 | 18.0 | 1.23 | 42.7 | 25.8 |
| 2 | 1.72 | 1.92 | 0.19 | 4.53 | 0 | 8.36 | 20.6 | 23.0 | 2.27 | 54.2 | 0 |
| 3 | 1.31 | 2.36 | 0.32 | 7.35 | 0 | 11.3 | 11.6 | 20.9 | 2.83 | 65.0 | 0 |
| 4 | 1.68 | 2.40 | 0.55 | 12.6 | 0 | 17.2 | 9.76 | 15.7 | 3.19 | 73.1 | 0 |
| 5 | 4.62 | 7.30 | 3.27 | 74.7 | 1.25 | 91.2 | 5.07 | 8.00 | 3.59 | 59.5 | 1.37 |
| 6 | 4.29 | 5.84 | 2.37 | 54.3 | 3.18 | 70.0 | 6.13 | 8.35 | 3.39 | 77.6 | 4.55 |
| 7 | 4.06 | 7.32 | 3.23 | 74.0 | 1.25 | 89.9 | 4.52 | 8.15 | 3.59 | 82.4 | 1.39 |
| 8 | 4.95 | 56.3 | 0.59 | 13.6 | 9.61 | 85.1 | 5.81 | 66.2 | 0.69 | 16.0 | 11.3 |
| 9 | 18.1 | 25.6 | 0.17 | 4.05 | 0 | 47.8 | 37.9 | 53.5 | 0.36 | 8.47 | 0 |
| 10 | 22.1 | 18.5 | 0.06 | 1.54 | 3.75 | 46.0 | 48.1 | 40.3 | 0.13 | 3.35 | 8.16 |
| 11 | 5.88 | 4.08 | 2.68 | 61.4 | 2.30 | 76.3 | 7.71 | 5.35 | 3.21 | 80.4 | 3.01 |
| 12 | 12.1 | 6.72 | 0.16 | 3.74 | 26.8 | 49.6 | 24.5 | 13.6 | 0.32 | 7.54 | 54.1 |
| 13 | 7.58 | 108 | 2.02 | 46.3 | 7.11 | 171 | 4.43 | 63.2 | 1.18 | 27.1 | 4.16 |
| 14 | 14.1 | 14.9 | 0.10 | 2.38 | 6.83 | 38.4 | 36.9 | 38.9 | 0.26 | 6.20 | 17.8 |
| 15 | 4.33 | 19.0 | 2.89 | 66.2 | 6.92 | 99.4 | 4.36 | 19.2 | 2.91 | 66.6 | 6.96 |
| 16 | 14.5 | 20.6 | 0.17 | 4.05 | 7.21 | 47.0 | 30.8 | 43.9 | 0.36 | 8.63 | 15.4 |
CF contamination factor, CF in C degree of contamination
Fig. 3Value samples BIF (sites from 1 to 16)
Fig. 4Similarity dendrogram for sampling sites (1–16) (a) and a graph k − means for the study properties (b)
Values of the two extracted factor loadings for 14 elements
| Parameters | Component matrix | |
|---|---|---|
| PC1 | PC2 | |
| pH H2O | 0.807* | −0.131 |
| pH KCl | 0.818* | −0.108 |
| Sand | −0.066 | 0.909* |
| Silt | 0.114 | −0.880* |
| Clay | −0.128 | −0.885* |
| OC | 0.047 | −0.553 |
| Zn | 0.806* | −0.229 |
| Cu | 0.399 | −0.243 |
| Ni | −0.558 | −0.740* |
| Pb | −0.558 | −0.740* |
| Cd | 0.578 | 0.053 |
| EC1:5DEH | 0.910* | −0.158 |
| CAT | −0.634 | 0.264 |
| −0.398 | −0.012 | |
| Variation (%) | 32.26 | 28.76 |
| Eigenvalue | 4.516 | 4.026 |
*Statistically significant
Fig. 5Configuration of variables in the system of the first two axes PC1 and PC2 of principal components