Literature DB >> 28963694

Intake, digestibility, growth performance, and enteric methane emission of Brazilian semiarid non-descript breed goats fed diets with different forage to concentrate ratios.

Aynoanne Leandro Barbosa1, Tadeu Vinhas Voltolini1,2,3, Daniel Ribeiro Menezes1, Salete Alves de Moraes1,2, Julio Cesar Silva Nascimento1, Rafael Torres de Souza Rodrigues4.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the intake, digestibility, growth performance, and enteric methane emissions of Brazilian semiarid non-descript breed goats (NDG) fed diets with different forage:concentrate ratios (100:0, 80:20, 60:40, 40:60, and 20:80) on a dry matter basis. Forty uncastrated male NDG with an average initial body weight of 13.3 kg ± 4.7 kg were distributed in a completely randomized design, with five treatments and eight replications. Ground Tifton-85 hay was used as forage and ground corn and soybean meal were used as concentrate. The sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique was used to measure methane emissions. The intake of dry matter, organic matter, crude protein, and ether extract increased linearly while the intake of neutral detergent fiber decreased linearly as the concentrate proportion increased (P < 0.05). The digestibility of dry matter and organic matter increased while the digestibility of neutral detergent fiber decreased as the concentrate level increased (P < 0.05). There were linear increases in final body weight, total weight gain, average daily gain, and feed efficiency (P < 0.0001). Methane emissions per unit of body weight (ranging from 1.9 to 0.5 g/kg), metabolic body weight (ranging from 3.9 to 1.2 g/kg), and dry matter intake (ranging from 58.8 to 21.9 g/kg) reduced linearly as the concentrate proportion increased (P < 0.01). Decreasing the forage to concentrate ratio in the diet decreased methane emission and increased growth performance of NDG. The 80:20 ratio could be considered more appropriate to reduce methane emissions from NDG, which did not change much at higher levels of concentrate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Forage:concentrate ratio; Goats; Methane; Ruminal fermentation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28963694     DOI: 10.1007/s11250-017-1427-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod        ISSN: 0049-4747            Impact factor:   1.559


  13 in total

1.  Biomass use, production, feed efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions from global livestock systems.

Authors:  Mario Herrero; Petr Havlík; Hugo Valin; An Notenbaert; Mariana C Rufino; Philip K Thornton; Michael Blümmel; Franz Weiss; Delia Grace; Michael Obersteiner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  New aspects and strategies for methane mitigation from ruminants.

Authors:  Sanjay Kumar; Prasanta Kumar Choudhury; Maria Dolores Carro; Gareth Wyn Griffith; Sumit Singh Dagar; Monica Puniya; Serena Calabro; Sreenivas Rao Ravella; Tejpal Dhewa; Ramesh Chandra Upadhyay; Sunil Kumar Sirohi; Shivlal Singh Kundu; Metha Wanapat; Anil Kumar Puniya
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Microbial ecosystem and methanogenesis in ruminants.

Authors:  D P Morgavi; E Forano; C Martin; C J Newbold
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Special topics--Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: I. A review of enteric methane mitigation options.

Authors:  A N Hristov; J Oh; J L Firkins; J Dijkstra; E Kebreab; G Waghorn; H P S Makkar; A T Adesogan; W Yang; C Lee; P J Gerber; B Henderson; J M Tricarico
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Supplementation of banana flower powder pellet and plant oil sources on in vitro ruminal fermentation, digestibility, and methane production.

Authors:  Sungchhang Kang; Metha Wanapat; Bounnaxay Viennasay
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 1.559

6.  Effect of different levels of concentrate on ruminal microorganisms and rumen fermentation in Nellore steers.

Authors:  Yury T Granja-Salcedo; Carlos S Ribeiro Júnior; Raphael B de Jesus; Arturo S Gomez-Insuasti; Astrid R Rivera; Juliana D Messana; Roberta C Canesin; Telma T Berchielli
Journal:  Arch Anim Nutr       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.242

7.  Estimation of the maintenance energy requirements, methane emissions and nitrogen utilization efficiency of two suckler cow genotypes.

Authors:  C X Zou; F O Lively; A R G Wylie; T Yan
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Methane emission by Nellore cattle subjected to different nutritional plans.

Authors:  Olinta Leone Cota; Darcilene Maria de Figueiredo; Renata Helena Branco; Elaine Magnani; Cleisy Ferreira do Nascimento; Luiza Freitas de Oliveira; Maria Eugênia Zerlotti Mercadante
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 1.559

9.  Murciano-Granadina Goat Performance and Methane Emission after Replacing Barley Grain with Fibrous By-Products.

Authors:  Carla Ibáñez; Patricia Criscioni; Haritz Arriaga; Pilar Merino; Francisco Juan Espinós; Carlos Fernández
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effects of dietary forage-to-concentrate ratio on nutrient digestibility and enteric methane production in growing goats (Capra hircus hircus) and Sika deer (Cervus nippon hortulorum).

Authors:  Youngjun Na; Dong Hua Li; Sang Rak Lee
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 2.509

View more
  3 in total

1.  Changes in the Metagenome-Encoded CAZymes of the Rumen Microbiome Are Linked to Feed-Induced Reductions in Methane Emission From Holstein Cows.

Authors:  Kristian Barrett; Lene Lange; Christian F Børsting; Dana W Olijhoek; Peter Lund; Anne S Meyer
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 6.064

2.  Comparative Study of Intake, Apparent Digestibility and Energy and Nitrogen Uses in Sahelian and Majorera Dairy Goats Fed Hay of Vigna unguiculata.

Authors:  Fafa Sow; Khady Niang; Younouss Camara; El Hadji Traoré; Nassim Moula; Jean François Cabaraux; Ayao Missohou; Jean-Luc Hornick
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Effect of different feeding management on the respiratory methane emission and feces-derived methane yield of goat.

Authors:  Sutaryo Sutaryo; Retno Adiwinarti; Alastair James Ward; Mitsunori Kurihara; Agung Purnomoadi
Journal:  J Adv Vet Anim Res       Date:  2019-08-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.