Richard S Hoehn1, Derek E Go1, Vikrom K Dhar1, Young Kim1, Dennis J Hanseman1, Koffi Wima1, Shimul A Shah2,3. 1. Cincinnati Research in Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS), Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA. 2. Cincinnati Research in Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS), Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA. Shimul.shah@uc.edu. 3. The James and Catherine Orr Endowed Chair of Liver Transplantation, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, 231 Albert Sabin Way, ML 0558, MSB 2006C, Cincinnati, OH, 45267-0558, USA. Shimul.shah@uc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several studies have identified a "weekend effect" for surgical outcomes, but definitions vary and the cause is unclear. Our aim was to better characterize the weekend effect for emergency general surgery using mortality as a primary endpoint. METHODS: Using data from the University HealthSystem Consortium from 2009 to 2013, we identified urgent/emergent hospital admissions for seven procedures representing 80% of the national burden of emergency general surgery. Patient characteristics and surgical outcomes were compared between cases that were performed on weekdays vs weekends. RESULTS: Hospitals varied widely in the proportion of procedures performed on the weekend. Of the procedures examined, four had higher mortality for weekend cases (laparotomy, lysis of adhesions, partial colectomy, and small bowel resection; p < 0.01), while three did not (appendectomy, cholecystectomy, and peptic ulcer disease repair). Among the four procedures with increased weekend mortality, patients undergoing weekend procedures also had increased severity of illness and shorter time from admission to surgery (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis adjusting for patient characteristics demonstrated independently higher mortality on weekends for these same four procedures (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, we have identified specific emergency general surgery procedures that incur higher mortality when performed on weekends. This may be due to acute changes in patient status that require weekend surgery or indications for urgent procedures (ischemia, obstruction) compared to those without a weekend mortality difference (infection). Hospitals that perform weekend surgery must acknowledge and identify ways to manage this increased risk.
BACKGROUND: Several studies have identified a "weekend effect" for surgical outcomes, but definitions vary and the cause is unclear. Our aim was to better characterize the weekend effect for emergency general surgery using mortality as a primary endpoint. METHODS: Using data from the University HealthSystem Consortium from 2009 to 2013, we identified urgent/emergent hospital admissions for seven procedures representing 80% of the national burden of emergency general surgery. Patient characteristics and surgical outcomes were compared between cases that were performed on weekdays vs weekends. RESULTS: Hospitals varied widely in the proportion of procedures performed on the weekend. Of the procedures examined, four had higher mortality for weekend cases (laparotomy, lysis of adhesions, partial colectomy, and small bowel resection; p < 0.01), while three did not (appendectomy, cholecystectomy, and peptic ulcer disease repair). Among the four procedures with increased weekend mortality, patients undergoing weekend procedures also had increased severity of illness and shorter time from admission to surgery (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis adjusting for patient characteristics demonstrated independently higher mortality on weekends for these same four procedures (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, we have identified specific emergency general surgery procedures that incur higher mortality when performed on weekends. This may be due to acute changes in patient status that require weekend surgery or indications for urgent procedures (ischemia, obstruction) compared to those without a weekend mortality difference (infection). Hospitals that perform weekend surgery must acknowledge and identify ways to manage this increased risk.
Entities:
Keywords:
Emergency general surgery; Mortality; Outcomes; Policy; Weekend effect
Authors: Seth D Goldstein; Dominic J Papandria; Jonathan Aboagye; Jose H Salazar; Kyle Van Arendonk; Khaled Al-Omar; Gezzer Ortega; Maria Grazia Sacco Casamassima; Fizan Abdullah Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2014-01-21 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: Joaquim M Havens; Allan B Peetz; Woo S Do; Zara Cooper; Edward Kelly; Reza Askari; Gally Reznor; Ali Salim Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Richard S Hoehn; Koffi Wima; Matthew A Vestal; Drew J Weilage; Dennis J Hanseman; Daniel E Abbott; Shimul A Shah Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Deborah A Taira; Todd B Seto; Richard Siegrist; Roberta Cosgrove; Ronna Berezin; David J Cohen Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Stephen C Gale; Shahid Shafi; Viktor Y Dombrovskiy; Dena Arumugam; Jessica S Crystal Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Anai N Kothari; Matthew A C Zapf; Robert H Blackwell; Talar Markossian; Victor Chang; Zhiyong Mi; Gopal N Gupta; Paul C Kuo Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: M A Gillies; N I Lone; R M Pearse; C Haddow; L Smyth; R W Parks; T S Walsh; E M Harrison Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2017-03-21 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: Giovanni D Tebala; Marika S Milani; Roberto Cirocchi; Mark Bignell; Giles Bond-Smith; Christopher Lewis; Vanni Agnoletti; Marco Catarci; Salomone Di Saverio; Gianluigi Luridiana; Fausto Catena; Marco Scatizzi; Pierluigi Marini Journal: World J Emerg Surg Date: 2022-04-29 Impact factor: 5.469