Literature DB >> 28963160

Accuracy of CT-navigated pedicle screw positioning in the cervical and upper thoracic region with and without prior anterior surgery and ventral plating.

A Rienmüller1, N Buchmann2, J S Kirschke2, E L Meyer3, J Gempt2, J Lehmberg2, B Meyer2, Y M Ryang2.   

Abstract

AIMS: We aimed to retrospectively assess the accuracy and safety of CT navigated pedicle screws and to compare accuracy in the cervical and thoracic spine (C2-T8) with (COMB) and without (POST) prior anterior surgery (anterior cervical discectomy or corpectomy and fusion with ventral plating: ACDF/ACCF). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 592 pedicle screws, which were used in 107 consecutively operated patients (210 COMB, 382 POST), were analysed. The accuracy of positioning was determined according to the classification of Gertzbein and Robbins on post-operative CT scans.
RESULTS: High accuracy was achieved in 524 screws (88.5%), 192 (87.7%) in the cervical spine and 332 (89%) in the thoracic spine, respectively. The results in the two surgical groups were compared and a logistic regression mixed model was performed to analyse the risk of low accuracy. Significantly lower accuracy was found in the COMB group with 82.9% versus 91.6% in the POST group (p = 0.036). There were no neurological complications, but two vertebral artery lesions were recorded. Three patients underwent revision surgery for malpositioning of a screw. Although the risk of malpositioning of a screw after primary anterior surgery was estimated to be 2.4-times higher than with posterior surgery alone, the overall rates of complication and revision were low.
CONCLUSION: We therefore conclude that CT navigated pedicle screws can be positioned safely although greater caution must be taken in patients who have previously undergone anterior surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1373-80. ©2017 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT navigation; Cervical spine instrumentation; Cervicothoracic junction; Combined approach; Pedicle screw accuracy; Spinal surgery and complications

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28963160     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B10.BJJ-2016-1283.R1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  4 in total

Review 1.  Posterior Fusion for the Subaxial Cervical Spine: A Review of the Major Techniques.

Authors:  Christopher M Mikhail; James E Dowdell; Andrew C Hecht
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2019-10-25

2.  Insertion Angle of Pedicle Screws in the Subaxial Cervical Spine: The Analysis of Computed Tomography-Navigated Insertion of Pedicle Screws.

Authors:  Stavros Oikonomidis; Frank Beyer; Carolin Meyer; Christoph Tobias Baltin; Peer Eysel; Jan Bredow
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2019-07-30

3.  Morphological characteristics of subaxial cervical pedicles and surrounding critical structures in patients with vertebral artery dominance - an anatomical study based on computed tomographic imaging.

Authors:  Jin Yang; Tao Li; Qing Wang; Gaoju Wang; Song Wang; Shuang Xu; Shuai Zhang; Qiuhan Li
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Volar Locking Plate Fixation for Distal Radius Fractures by Intraoperative Computed Tomographic-Guided Navigation.

Authors:  Akira Kawabata; Yusuke Sogabe; Yukiko Morimoto; Kiyohito Takamatsu
Journal:  J Hand Surg Glob Online       Date:  2020-09-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.