Literature DB >> 28962843

Immediately loaded implant-supported full-arches: Peri-implant status after 1-9years in a private practice.

Iñaki Cercadillo-Ibarguren1, Alba Sánchez-Torres1, Rui Figueiredo2, Frank Schwarz3, Cosme Gay-Escoda4, Eduard Valmaseda-Castellón1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the peri-implant status on the long-term (1-9years) of patients treated with immediately-loaded full-arch prostheses in a private practice.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was carried out in patients consecutively treated with immediately loaded full-arch restorations supported with a minimum of 4 implants (Replace® Tapered, Nobel Biocare AB) and Multi-Unit conical abutments (MUA®, Nobel Biocare AB) with a follow-up of over 12months after placement of the final prosthesis.
RESULTS: A total of 378 implants were placed in 56 patients. Forty upper and 32 lower arches were restored, and 16 patients received bimaxillary rehabilitation. The mean duration of follow-up was 50 months, and the implant and patient peri-implantitis prevalences were 14.3% and 50%, respectively. Mucositis affected 56.9% of the implants and 50% of the patients. The survival rate was 96.4% by patient, but reached 99.5% in the implant-based analysis, and the success rate was 95.5% for implants and 80.4% for patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Immediately-loaded full-arch restorations have an acceptable outcome after 1-9years of follow-up. However, the incidence of peri-implant diseases is high, and further research is needed to confirm whether these may compromise the predictability of the prostheses over the long-term. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: After a mean follow-up of 50months, the incidence of mucositis and peri-implantitis affected the 96.4% and 50% of patients, respectively. However, these results were reduced almost by half when the threshold of bleeding on probing and peri-implant bone loss applied was less strict.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Immediate loading; Implant-supported full-arch; Peri-implant diseases; Private practice

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28962843     DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  2 in total

1.  An evaluation of peri-implant marginal bone loss according to implant type, surgical technique and prosthetic rehabilitation: a retrospective multicentre and cross-sectional cohort study.

Authors:  Lizett Castellanos-Cosano; Alba Carrasco-García; José-Ramón Corcuera-Flores; Javier Silvestre-Rangil; Daniel Torres-Lagares; Guillermo Machuca-Portillo
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Survival and success rates of soft-milled cobalt-chromium-ceramic full-arch screw-retained implant-supported prostheses: a 2- to 7-year follow-up retrospective study.

Authors:  S Levartovsky; A Arieli; N Fridenberg; S Matalon; R Pilo
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 3.573

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.