Literature DB >> 28962741

Effect of print layer height and printer type on the accuracy of 3-dimensional printed orthodontic models.

Christian S Favero1, Jeryl D English1, Benjamin E Cozad1, John O Wirthlin1, Megan M Short2, F Kurtis Kasper3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies enable production of orthodontic models from digital files; yet a range of variables associated with the process could impact the accuracy and clinical utility of the models. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of print layer height on the accuracy of orthodontic models printed 3 dimensionally using a stereolithography format printer and to compare the accuracy of orthodontic models fabricated with several commercially available 3D printers.
METHODS: Thirty-six identical models were produced with a stereolithography-based 3D printer using 3 layer heights (n = 12 per group): 25, 50, and 100 μm. Forty-eight additional models were printed using 4 commercially available 3D printers (n = 12 per group). Each printed model was digitally scanned and compared with the input file via superimposition analysis using a best-fit algorithm to assess accuracy.
RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were found in the average overall deviations of models printed at each layer height, with the 25-μm and 100-μm layer height groups having the greatest and least deviations, respectively. Statistically significant differences were also found in the average overall deviations of models produced using the various 3D printer models, but all values fell within clinically acceptable limits.
CONCLUSIONS: The print layer height and printer model can affect the accuracy of a 3D printed orthodontic model, but the impact should be considered with respect to the clinical tolerances associated with the envisioned application.
Copyright © 2017 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28962741     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  14 in total

1.  Influence of the three-dimensional printing technique and printing layer thickness on model accuracy.

Authors:  Zhe-Chen Zhang; Pei-Lun Li; Feng-Ting Chu; Gang Shen
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Bracket transfer accuracy with two different three-dimensional printed transfer trays vs silicone transfer trays.

Authors:  Lea Hoffmann; Hisham Sabbagh; Andera Wichelhaus; Andreas Kessler
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 2.684

Review 3.  Additive Manufacturing with 3D Printing: Progress from Bench to Bedside.

Authors:  Ziyaur Rahman; Sogra F Barakh Ali; Tanil Ozkan; Naseem A Charoo; Indra K Reddy; Mansoor A Khan
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Three-Dimensional Evaluation on Accuracy of Conventional and Milled Gypsum Models and 3D Printed Photopolymer Models.

Authors:  Jae-Won Choi; Jong-Ju Ahn; Keunbada Son; Jung-Bo Huh
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Accuracy of different tooth surfaces on 3D printed dental models: orthodontic perspective.

Authors:  Ting Dong; Xiaoting Wang; Lunguo Xia; Lingjun Yuan; Niansong Ye; Bing Fang
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 2.757

6.  Additive Manufacturing of a Miniature Functional Trocar for Eye Surgery.

Authors:  Kirsten Lussenburg; Marta Scali; Aimée Sakes; Paul Breedveld
Journal:  Front Med Technol       Date:  2022-02-17

7.  'Invisible' orthodontics by polymeric 'clear' aligners molded on 3D-printed personalized dental models.

Authors:  Xiaoye Yu; Guanghui Li; Yikan Zheng; Jingming Gao; Ye Fu; Qunsong Wang; Lei Huang; Xiaogang Pan; Jiandong Ding
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2022-02-04

8.  Evaluation of the accuracy of orthodontic models prototyped with entry-level LCD-based 3D printers: a study using surface-based superimposition and deviation analysis.

Authors:  Antonino Lo Giudice; Vincenzo Ronsivalle; Lorenzo Rustico; Kaled Aboulazm; Gaetano Isola; Giuseppe Palazzo
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  In vitro accuracies of 3D printed models manufactured by two different printing technologies.

Authors:  Faruk Emir; Gulsum Ceylan; Simel Ayyildiz
Journal:  Eur Oral Res       Date:  2021-05-04

10.  Comparison of Dental Stone Models and Their 3D Printed Acrylic Replicas for the Accuracy and Mechanical Properties.

Authors:  Marta Czajkowska; Ewa Walejewska; Łukasz Zadrożny; Monika Wieczorek; Wojciech Święszkowski; Leopold Wagner; Eitan Mijiritsky; Jarosław Markowski
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-13       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.