Literature DB >> 28962492

Use of an intraoperative checklist to decrease the incidence of re-exploration for postoperative bleeding after cardiac surgery.

Astrid G M van Boxtel1, Dennis van Veghel2, Mohamed A Soliman Hamad1, Daniela N Schulz2, Pieter S Stepaniak3, Albert H M van Straten1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We have implemented an intraoperative checklist aiming to reduce the incidence of re-exploration for bleeding after cardiac surgery. The present report addresses the results of adopting such a checklist regarding the incidence of postoperative bleeding.
METHODS: The checklist was implemented by presenting it in several staff meetings of the Catharina Heart Center. Copies of the checklist were presented in every operating room. Data were collected by the Catharina Heart Center, aligned with the 'Meetbaar Beter' data manual and validated by 'Meetbaar Beter' through their data quality system. The incidence of re-exploration for bleeding was analysed in a variable life-adjusted display curve. The patient population operated after the implementation of the checklist was compared with a recent historical population before its implementation.
RESULTS: From January 2013 through April 2016, 4817 cardiac surgical procedures were performed in our institution. Before May 2015, 3210 procedures were performed (Group 1), complicated by 112 re-exploration for bleeding (3.5%). The 'reoperation for bleeding checklist' was implemented on 1 May 2015. After this date, the number of re-explorations for bleeding decreased to 29 (1.8%) of the 1607 cardiac surgical procedures (Group 2) (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: An intraoperative checklist is feasible to implement, low cost, quick and simple to measure with a significant reduction in the incidence of re-exploration for bleeding. This report shows an example of the positive effects of transparency in publishing outcomes' data in cardiac surgery.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bleeding; Checklist; Outcome measures; Re-exploration

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28962492     DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivx130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  5 in total

1.  Improving clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction among patients with coronary artery disease: an example of enhancing regional integration between a cardiac centre and a referring hospital.

Authors:  Dennis van Veghel; Mohamed Soliman-Hamad; Daniela N Schulz; Bernard Cost; Timothy A Simmers; Lukas R C Dekker
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Clinical Efficacy of Combined Surgical Patient Safety System and the World Health Organization's Checklists in Surgery: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Anette Storesund; Arvid Steinar Haugen; Hans Flaatten; Monica W Nortvedt; Geir Egil Eide; Marja A Boermeester; Nick Sevdalis; Øystein Tveiten; Ruby Mahesparan; Bjørg Merete Hjallen; Jonas Meling Fevang; Catrine Hjelle Størksen; Heidi Frances Thornhill; Gunnar Helge Sjøen; Solveig Moss Kolseth; Rune Haaverstad; Oda Kristine Sandli; Eirik Søfteland
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 14.766

3.  Commentary: Doctor, your patient is bleeding.

Authors:  Robert S Kramer
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-09-16

4.  Commentary: Good things come to those who wait.

Authors:  Thin X Vo; Fraser D Rubens
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-09-07

5.  A simulation-based pilot study of crisis checklists in the emergency department.

Authors:  Beatrice Billur Knoche; Caroline Busche; Marlon Grodd; Hans-Jörg Busch; Soeren Sten Lienkamp
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.397

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.