| Literature DB >> 28962340 |
Shilpi Dixit1, Pushpa Dhar1, Raj D Mehra1.
Abstract
The present study focused on the role of exogenous alpha lipoic acid (ALA) in amelioration of inorganic arsenic (iAs) induced effects on apoptosis and apoptosis associated proteins in developing rat hippocampus. NaAsO2 (1.5/2.0 mg/kg bw) alone or along with ALA (70 mg/kg bw) was administered to rat pups (experimental groups) by intraperitoneal (i.p.) route from postnatal day (PND) 4-15. Controls received no treatment/distilled water/ALA. On PND 16, the animals were perfusion fixed and the brains were processed for paraffin embedding (CV and TUNEL staining) and cryopreservation (immunohistochemistry). The fresh brain tissue was used for Western blotting. Significant increase was observed in TUNEL positive cells and Bax (pro-apoptotic protein) expression in hippocampal sub-regions of iAs alone treated groups, whereas Bcl-2 expression was intensified in animals receiving ALA with iAs. Densitometric analysis (Western blots) revealed optimal restoration of Bax and Bcl-2 ratio in animals receiving ALA with iAs, thereby suggesting the protective role of ALA in iAs induced developmental neurotoxicity.Entities:
Keywords: ALA, alpha lipoic acid; Arsenic (iAs); Bax; Bcl-2; CA1, CA2, CA3, cornu amonis subregions; CV, cresyl violet; DG, dentate gyrus; Hippocampus; Na2AsO2, sodium arsenite; Oxidative stress; PND, post natal day; TUNEL, TdT mediated dUTP biotin nick-end labeling; i.p., intraperitoneal; iAs, arsenic; α-Lipoic acid (ALA)
Year: 2015 PMID: 28962340 PMCID: PMC5598373 DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2015.01.011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxicol Rep ISSN: 2214-7500
Fig. 1Photo micrographs of CV stained coronal sections of CA1, CA3 and DG (DGEC) from control (A1–A3); iAs alone (2.0 mg/kg bw) (B1–B3) and iAs (2.0 mg/kg bw) + ALA (C1–C3) treated groups showing well arranged 3–5 cell layer thick SP (Í) having cells with thin rim of cytoplasm around large ()/oval () nuclei and 1–3 small nucleoli. Disruption of pyramidal cell layers in SP (1–3 cell layer thick-), loosely packed pyramidal neurons (↖), with shrunken nuclei (↔) (B1 and B2). SO – stratum oriens; SP – stratum pyramidale; SR – stratum radiatum; ML – molecular layer; GCL – granule cell layer; SGZ – sub granule zone.
Mean neuronal number (number of neurons/mm2) of pyramidal neurons in CA1, CA3 and granule cells in DG (DGEC, DGEN), of hippocampus in the control and the experimental groups (PND 16).
| Groups | Mean ± SD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA1 | CA3 | DGEC | DGEN | |
| Sc ( | 6936.5 ± 971.48 | 2926.16 ± 241.95 | 9761.33± 1009.99 | 11,969.17 ±032.46 |
| NaAsO21.5 ( | 4077.16 ± 828.17 | 1976.66 ± 571.95 | 5919.66 ± 1277.48 | 7463.5 ± 1757.67 |
| NaAsO22.0 ( | 3710.66 ± 762.58 | 1810.33 ± 201.99 | 5922.83 ± 890.06 | 7175 ± 1295.94 |
| NaAsO21.5 + ALA ( | 6136.5 ± 961.55 | 2955.5 ± 481.75 | 9100 ± 1589.01 | 10,553 ± 1930.60 |
| NaAsO22.0 + ALA ( | 6099 ± 1029.96 | 2833.33 ± 477.60 | 9363.83 ± 1166.74 | 10,261 ± 1416.14 |
| 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | |
Results compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni correction, CA1, CA3 and DG (pairwise comparison).
Sc vs NaAsO21.5.
Sc vs NaAsO22.0.
NaAsO21.5 vs NaAsO21.5 + ALA.
NaAsO22.0 vs NaAsO22.0 + ALA.
p < 0.05, statistically significant.
Fig. 2Photo micrographs of TUNEL stained coronal sections of CA1, CA3 and DGEC from control (A1–A3); iAs alone (2.0 mg/kg bw) (B1–B3) and iAs + ALA treated groups (C1–C3). Intensely stained dark brown TUNEL positive pyramidal neurons (↑) in SP (B1 and B2) and granule cells (→) in GCL (B3). Light brown staining in C1–C3 is comparable to A1–A3.
Number of TUNEL +ve cells/mm2 in CA1, CA3 and DG (DGEC, DGEN) of the control and the experimental groups (PND 16).
| Groups | Mean ± SD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA1 | CA3 | DGEC | DGEN | |
| Sc ( | 131.25 ± 11.13 | 123.69 ± 16.92 | 106.16 ± 16.97 | 111.33 ± 9.60 |
| NaAsO21.5 ( | 57.78 ± 4.97 | 58.80 ± 10.42 | 52.12 ± 6.34 | 57.81 ± 5.05 |
| NaAsO22.0 ( | 53.54 ± 3.75 | 55.66 ± 9.20 | 46.38 ± 5.32 | 49.81 ± 8.76 |
| NaAsO21.5 + ALA ( | 109.31 ± 11.61 | 110.59 ± 12.93 | 98.93 ± 5.47 | 102.5 ± 6.32 |
| NaAsO22.0 + ALA ( | 108.26 ± 19.65 | 105.96 ± 19.60 | 101.56 ± 11.37 | 103.84 ± 14.66 |
| 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | |
Results compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni correction, CA1, CA3 and DG (pairwise comparison).
Sc vs NaAsO21.5.
Sc vs NaAsO22.0.
NaAsO21.5 vs NaAsO21.5 + ALA.
NaAsO22.0 vs NaAsO22.0 + ALA.
p < 0.05, statistically significant.
Fig. 3Coronal sections of CA1, CA3 and DGEC from control (A1–A3); iAs alone (2.0 mg/kg bw) (B1–B3) and iAs + ALA treated groups (C1–C3) showing intense expression of Bax in neuronal perikarya (→) and processes () of pyramidal and granule cells in experimental groups (B1–B3). The intensity of Bax expression in C1–C3 is comparable to A1–A3.
Fig. 4Coronal sections of CA1, CA3 and DGEC from control (A1–A3); iAs alone (2.0 mg/kg bw) (B1–B3) and iAs + ALA treated groups (C1–C3) showing intense expression of Bcl-2 in pyramidal cell nuclei (→) (C1 and C2) and granule cell nuclei (→) (C3), the intensity being comparable to A1–A3. Bcl-2 is faintly expressed in pyramidal cell nuclei (B1 and B2) and granule cell nuclei (B3).
Fig. 5Immunoblots showing increased intensity of Bax expression in lanes 3 and 4 (A1) and Bcl-2 expression in lanes 5 and 6 (A2); Molecular weight marker lane 0. Band of β-tubulin as loading control (B1 and B2). Nc and Sc (lanes 1 and 2); iAs 1.5 and 2.0 (lanes 3 and 4); iAs 1.5 + ALA and 2.0 + ALA (lanes 5 and 6). Comparison by Kurskal–Wallis test followed by Bonferroni correction (pairwise comparison). * Sc vs iAs 1.5 (p < .001), # Sc vs iAs 2.0 (p < .001), ** iAs 1.5 vs iAs 1.5 + ALA (p < .001), 2.0 vs iAs + ALA (p < .001).