Literature DB >> 28962186

Ulinastatin attenuates diabetes-induced cardiac dysfunction by the inhibition of inflammation and apoptosis.

Wen-Ke Wang1, Qing-Hua Lu1, Xin Wang1, Ben Wang2, Juan Wang1, Hui-Ping Gong1, Lin Wang3, Hao Li1, Yi-Meng Du1.   

Abstract

Ulinastatin exhibits anti-inflammatory activity and protects the heart from ischemia/reperfusion injury. However, whether ulinastatin has a protective effect in diabetic cardiomyopathy is yet to be elucidated. The aim of the present study was to investigate the protective effects of ulinastatin against diabetic cardiomyopathy and its underlying mechanisms. A C57/BL6J mice model of diabetic cardiomyopathy was used and mice were randomly assigned to three groups: Control group, diabetes mellitus (DM) group and DM + ulinastatin treatment group. Cardiac function was assessed using echocardiography and the level of inflammatory cytokine high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) expression was measured using histopathological examination and reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interleukin (IL)-6 were measured using western blotting and ELISA. The apoptosis rate in the myocardium was assessed by TUNEL assay. Caspase-3 activation, expression of B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) and Bcl-2 associated × (Bax) were measured using western blotting, as was the activity of the mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway. The results indicated that ulinastatin significantly improved cardiac function in mice with DM. Ulinastatin treatment significantly downregulated HMGB1, TNF-α and IL-6 expression (P<0.05) and significantly reduced the percentage of apoptotic cardiomyocytes (P<0.05) via reduction of caspase-3 activation and the ratio of Bax/Bcl-2 in diabetic hearts (P<0.05). In addition, ulinastatin attenuated the activation of the MAPK signaling pathway. In conclusion, ulinastatin had a protective effect against DM-induced cardiac dysfunction in a mouse model. This protective effect may be associated with the anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic abilities of ulinastatin via the MAPK signaling pathway.

Entities:  

Keywords:  apoptosis; diabetic cardiomyopathy; inflammation; ulinastatin

Year:  2017        PMID: 28962186      PMCID: PMC5609313          DOI: 10.3892/etm.2017.4824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Ther Med        ISSN: 1792-0981            Impact factor:   2.447


Introduction

Diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM) is responsible for increased morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) (1). The pathophysiology of DCM includes myocardial apoptosis, hypertrophy and cardiac fibrosis (2). Hyperglycemia is regarded as an inflammatory condition with the increased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the myocardium (3). Cardiomyocyte apoptosis is an important process induced by inflammation and oxidative stress in the diabetic heart, which eventually leads to cardiac dysfunction (4). Therefore, inhibition of cardiac inflammation and apoptosis is important in the prevention and treatment of DCM (5). Ulinastatin is an endogenous inhibitor of proteases, which is located in the urine and blood (6). It is reported that ulinastatin may inhibit various serine proteases, including trypsin, chymotrypsin, neutrophil elastase and plasmin (7). On the basis of the multivalent nature of protease inhibition, ulinastatin has been used as a myocardial protective agent (8,9). Ulinastatin has been reported to improve cardiac dysfunction, reduce myocardial infarct size and decrease serum levels of inflammatory cytokines during hemorrhagic shock and ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury in the heart (10,11). Previous investigations have demonstrated that the protective effect of ulinastatin is attributed to its anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative stress and anti-apoptotic properties (12,13). However, the therapeutic effects of ulinastatin in mice with DM remain unclear. Hyperglycemia-induced inflammation serves an important role in the pathogenesis of DCM (14). As described in our previous study, high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) is a mediator of inflammation in the pathophysiology of DCM (15). HMGB1 is translocated from the nucleus to the cytoplasm and secreted into the extracellular matrix in the diabetic myocardium (15). Furthermore, cardiomyocytes and cardiac fibroblasts are the principal sources of released HMGB1 (15). It has been reported that ulinastatin is able to reduce the expression of HMGB1 in hepatic I/R injury (16). Based on these reports, it may be speculated that ulinastatin is able to inhibit HMGB1 expression, thereby reducing the inflammatory response in DCM. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-10 are cytokines associated with the inflammatory response (17). During the inflammatory response, TNF-α is initially released and regulates IL-6 and IL-8 levels (18). A previous study demonstrated that the protective effects of ulinastatin may be attributed to a number of anti-inflammatory mechanisms (19). Furthermore, ulinastatin was reported to inhibit TNF-α and IL-6 and increase IL-10 levels in sepsis (20). A previous study provided evidence that ulinastatin inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced TNF-α upregulation and subsequent IL-1β and IL-6 induction by macrophages, possibly via the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway and utilizing extracellular signal-related kinase 1/2, c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and p38 in vitro (21). Ulinastatin was demonstrated to significantly reduce the phosphorylation of p38 and JNK in I/R myocardium injury (22), and DM-induced cardiac dysfunction is reportedly associated with activation of MAPKs, including p38 and JNK (23). The aim of the present study was to investigate whether ulinastatin protects against DCM and to explore the underlying mechanisms responsible.

Materials and methods

Establishment of type 1 DM model in mice

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Shandong University (Jinan, China). A total of 24 C57/BL6J male mice (25–30 g, 6–8 weeks old) were purchased from Beijing Weitong Lihua Experimental Animal Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). All mice were housed under standard conditions (12-h light/dark cycle, 22°C room temperature, 50% humidity) and given a normal diet with free access to water. Mice were randomly assigned to two groups: Control (n=8) and DM groups (n=16). Diabetes was induced in mice in the DM group via the injection of streptozotocin (STZ; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) dissolved in 0.1 ml citrate buffer (pH 4.5) intraperitoneally at a dose of 50 mg/kg per mouse for 5 consecutive days. The equivalent volume of citrate buffer was administered to mice in the control group. Blood glucose was measured using a glucometer (Accu-Chek Advantage; Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA). At 1 week after the course of STZ administration, mice with random blood glucose (RBG) levels ≥16.7 mmol/l were considered to be successful diabetic mouse models. Following the induction of diabetes for 8 weeks, mice in the DM group were divided into two groups: DM group (n=8) and DM + ulinastatin group (n=8). Body weight, plasma glucose levels, heart rate and systolic blood pressure were measured at 0, 8, and 12 weeks after the STZ or saline treatment.

Ulinastatin treatment

Ulinastatin was obtained from Tianpu Biochemical Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China). Ulinastatin was administered intraperitoneally at a dose of 100,000 U/kg daily to mice in the DM + ulinastatin group for 4 weeks, whereas the DM group received 0.9% saline alone. The dosage of 100,000 U/kg ulinastatin was selected as this dose has been reported to have a protective effect on mouse organs (24,25). At 12 weeks, mice were sacrificed. All experiments conformed to National Institutes of Health Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Cardiac function measurements

Echocardiography was performed with the aid of the VisualSonics Vevo 770 imaging system (VisualSonics, Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada) on all animals at baseline and at 8 and 12 weeks after the injection of STZ. Longitudinal and transverse parasternal and 4-chamber apical views were obtained. The M-mode and 2-dimensional imaging views were examined. Left ventricular internal dimensions in systole (LVIDs) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were estimated. Pulsed-wave Doppler echocardiography was used to measure early (E) and late (A) blood flow velocities through the mitral valve, and the E/A ratio was calculated.

Myocardial histology

The heart tissues were fixed in 4% formalin and embedded in paraffin. Tissues were sectioned into 4-µm slices for histological studies. All sections were boiled in sodium citrate buffer solution (pH 6.0) at 95°C for 15 min, incubated in 30% H2O2 for 10 min at room temperature and subsequently incubated with 5% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) for 30 min at room temperature. Sections were next incubated with primary antibodies against rabbit HMGB1 (1:1,000 dilution; ab18256; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) overnight at 4°C, followed by incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary goat anti-rabbit antibody (1:200 dilution; PV9001; Zhongshan Biological Technology, Beijing, China) for 30 min at room temperature. Signals were amplified with use of an ABC kit (Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA, USA) with diaminobenzidine as a chromogen and analyzed by use of Image-Pro Plus 6.0 (Media Cybernetics, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA).

Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)

Myocardial tissues were homogenized in TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) to extract total RNA. Purified RNA (2 µg) was treated with DNase and reverse transcribed (RevertAid M-MulV Reverse Transcriptase; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) following a program of 42°C for 1 h, 70°C for 5 min. qPCR was performed using the following primers: HMGB1 forward, 5′-ACCTGCCGGGAGGAGCACAA-3′ and reverse, 5′-GCCTCTTGGGGGCATTGG-3′; GAPDH forward, 5′-AGGTCGGTGTGAACGGATTTGGG-3′ and reverse, 5′-TGTAGACCATGTAGTTGAGGTCA-3′. PCR was performed using a thermocycler (IQ5 Real-Time PCR cycler; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) with SsoFast EvaGreen Supermix (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). The program was 30 sec at 95°C, then 40 cycles of 96°C for 5 sec and 56°C for 10 sec. The mRNA levels of the target genes were normalized to the expression level of GADPH. Relative mean fold change in expression was calculated using the 2−∆∆Cq method (26).

TUNEL assay

A TUNEL assay was performed to assess apoptosis. The formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded cardiac tissues were cut into 4-µm sections. Sections were deparaffinized by washing in a graded ethanol series. DNA fragments were determined using an ApopTag in situ apoptosis detection kit (ApopTag Plus Peroxidase; Chemicon; EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), according to the manufacturer's protocol. To quantify apoptosis, the stained sections were examined under an optical microscope (magnification, ×400) and the number of TUNEL positive cells was counted in 6 random microscopic fields and quantified by Image-Pro Plus 6.0 (Media Cybernetics, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA).

Western blot analysis

Mouse heart tissues were lysed in radioimmunoprecipitation assay lysis buffer and the extracted protein content was quantified using the bicinchoninic acid method. A total of 20 µg protein per lane was separated using 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was blocked with 5% nonfat milk for 1 h at room temperature and subsequently incubated overnight at 4°C with the following primary rabbit antibodies: Anti-β-actin (1:1,000 dilution; #4970; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA), anti-TNF-α (1:500 dilution; ab6671), anti-IL-6 (1:1,000 dilution; ab6672) (both from Abcam), cleaved caspase-3 (1:500 dilution; #9662), anti-B-cell lymphoma/l-2 (Bcl-2; 1:1,000 dilution; #3498), anti-Bcl-2-associated X (Bax; 1:1,000 dilution; #2772), anti-c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK; 1:1,000 dilution; #9252), anti-phospho-JNK (1:1,000 dilution; #4668), anti-p38 MAPK (1:1,000 dilution; #9212) and anti-phospho-p38 MAPK (1:1,000 dilution; #9211) (all from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.). Membranes were subsequently incubated with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (1:2,000 dilution; ZB2301; Zhongshan Biological Technology) for 1 h at room temperature. Membranes were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (EMD Millipore). TNF-α, IL-6, cleaved caspase-3, Bcl-2, Bax, JNK, phospho-JNK, p38 MAPK and phosphor-p38 MAPK expression was normalized against β-actin expression. The bands were developed with an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (EMD Millipore) and quantified by densitometric analysis (Quantity One version 4.64; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.).

ELISA

Cardiac TNF-α (H052; Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China) and IL-6 (555240; BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) were assessed using ELISA kits, according to the manufacturer's protocol.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 18.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The differences were determined by one-way analysis of variance followed by Fisher's least significant difference test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Mouse characteristics

Body weight, plasma glucose levels, heart rate and systolic blood pressure were measured at 0, 8, and 12 weeks after the STZ or saline treatment. At 8 and 12 weeks, mice in the DM group had significantly higher RBG and significantly lower body weights compared with the control (P<0.05; Table I). Ulinastatin had no significant effect on blood glucose, body weight, heart rate or systolic blood pressure (P>0.05; Table I).
Table I.

Blood glucose, body weight, heart rate and blood pressure measurements.

Parameter0 Weeks8 Weeks12 Weeks
Blood glucose (mmol/l)
  Control6.88±1.166.35±1.196.11±1.06
  DM6.70±1.1122.32±3.82[a]24.36±3.37[a]
  DM + ulinastatin6.46±0.9423.30±4.19[a]25.23±3.34[a]
Body weight (g)
  Control25.20±0.6626.60±1.1327.87±1.72
  DM24.99±0.9423.48±1.15[a]24.70±1.08[a]
  DM + ulinastatin25.51±0.6823.83±1.62[a]24.17±1.65[a]
Heart rate (bpm)
  Control606.13±25.50607.25±17.32610.63±16.43
  DM611.00±19.65605.38±22.13600.00±16.75
  DM + ulinastatin615.25±17.70598.13±20.80603.84±17.46
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)
  Control102.15±10.70113.00±13.18108.24±13.80
  DM108.25±15.26106.12±13.54102.75±14.30
  DM + ulinastatin99.13±12.41106.38±12.97105.00±12.77

DM, diabetes mellitus.

P<0.05 vs. control group.

Ulinastatin ameliorates DM-induced cardiac dysfunction

Echocardiography was used to assess the cardiac function at 0, 8 and 12 weeks after the STZ injections (Fig. 1). At the baseline, no significant difference was observed in LVEF, E/A ratio and LVIDs among the groups. At 8 weeks, the ratio of early to late mitral inflow velocity (E/A) was significantly reduced in mice with DM compared with controls (P<0.05; Fig. 1B). No significant difference was observed in LVEF and LVIDs between the control and DM groups at 8 weeks (Fig. 1C and D). At 12 weeks, E/A remained significantly reduced in mice with DM (P<0.05; Fig. 1B), and these mice displayed echocardiographic evidence of systolic dysfunction and cardiac remodeling compared with controls (Fig. 1A). LVEF was significantly lower (P<0.05; Fig. 1C) and LVIDs were significantly higher (P<0.05; Fig. 1D) in mice with DM compared with controls. Ulinastatin treatment significantly ameliorated the attenuated E/A (P<0.05; Fig. 1B) and LVEF (P<0.05; Fig. 1C) induced by DM, and significantly reduced LVIDs (P<0.05; Fig. 1D) in mice with DM at 12 weeks. These results suggest that mice with DM exhibited diastolic dysfunction after 8 weeks and systolic dysfunction and cardiac remodeling after 12 weeks, and these effects were ameliorated by ulinastatin treatment.
Figure 1.

Effect of ulinastatin on heart function in mice with DM. (A) Representative M-mode echocardiograms. (B) E/A, (C) LVEF and (D) LVIDs of the mice. *P<0.05 vs. control and #P<0.05 vs. DM. E/A, ratio of early to late mitral flow; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVIDs, left ventricular internal dimensions in systole; DM, diabetes mellitus.

Ulinastatin decreases the levels of HMGB1, TNF-α and IL-6 in diabetic myocardial tissue. Previous results have demonstrated that inflammatory cytokines serve an important role in the progression of DCM (27). To analyze the effect of ulinastatin on the inflammatory response induced by DM, the levels of HMGB1, TNF-α and IL-6 in mice myocardia were examined. We previously reported that HMGB1 serves an important role in DM-induced myocardial fibrosis and dysfunction (15). The protein and mRNA expression levels of HMGB1 in the myocardium were determined by immunohistochemistry (Fig. 2A and B) and RT-qPCR (Fig. 2C), respectively. The results indicate that HMGB1 protein and mRNA levels were significantly increased in mice with DM compared with the control group (P<0.05; Fig. 2B and C). However, ulinastatin treatment significantly reduced the DM-induced upregulation of HMGB1 (P<0.05; Fig. 2B and C). Furthermore, western blotting and ELISA results revealed that the levels of TNF-α and IL-6 were significantly increased in mice with DM compared with control mice (P<0.05; Fig. 3). With ulinastatin treatment, the expression of TNF-α and IL-6 significantly decreased in the diabetic myocardium (P<0.05; Fig. 3). These data suggest that ulinastatin may effectively alleviate the inflammatory response in the diabetic myocardium via the downregulation of HMGB1, TNF-α and IL-6.
Figure 2.

Effect of ulinastatin on HMGB1 levels in mouse myocardia. (A) Immunohistochemical analysis of HMGB1 protein expression in mice myocardia. Myocardial tissues were observed under a light microscope (scale bar, 20 µm). (B) Semi-quantification of HMGB1 staining. (C) Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis of HMGB1 mRNA expression. *P<0.05 vs. control and #P<0.05 vs. DM. HMGB1, high mobility group box 1; DM, diabetes mellitus.

Figure 3.

Ulinastatin treatment reduces the expression of TNF-α and IL-6 in mouse myocardia. Western blot analysis of (A) TNF-α and (B) IL-6 protein levels in myocardial tissues. β-actin was used as a loading control. Cardiac (C) TNF-α and (D) IL-6 levels measured using ELISA. *P<0.05 vs. control and #P<0.05 vs. DM. TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; IL-6, interleukin-6; DM, diabetes mellitus.

Ulinastatin reduces cardiomyocyte apoptosis in mice with DM

TUNEL staining was performed to investigate the effect of ulinastatin on DM-induced cardiomyocyte apoptosis. The number of TUNEL-positive cells in the heart tissue was significantly increased in the DM group compared with the control group (P<0.05; Fig. 4A), and ulinastatin intervention significantly decreased the number of TUNEL-positive cells compared with that in the untreated DM group (P<0.05; Fig. 4A). The expression of cleaved caspase-3 and the Bax/Bcl-2 ratio were significantly elevated in the diabetic myocardium compared with the control (P<0.05; Fig. 4B and C). Ulinastatin treatment was demonstrated to significantly ameliorate DM-induced caspase-3 cleavage and significantly reduce the Bax/Bcl-2 ratio (P<0.05; Fig. 4B and C). These findings indicate that ulinastatin decreases the rate of cardiomyocyte apoptosis and improves cardiac function in a mouse model of DM.
Figure 4.

Ulinastatin treatment protects against DM-induced myocardial apoptosis in mice. (A) Cardiomyocyte apoptosis was assessed using TUNEL staining. Apoptotic cells were those with brown staining in the nucleus (scale bar, 20 µm). Western blot analysis of protein levels of (B) cleaved caspase-3, and (C) Bcl-2 and Bax. *P<0.05 vs. control and #P<0.05 vs. DM. Bcl-2, B-cell lymphoma 2; Bax, Bcl-2-associated X; DM, diabetes mellitus.

Ulinastatin treatment reduces DM-induced activation of JNK and p38 signaling

The JNK and p38 signaling pathway is a critical pathway that regulates cardiomyocyte apoptosis (28). The effect of ulinastatin on the phosphorylation levels of JNK and p38 induced by DM was assessed, and western blotting results revealed that ulinastatin significantly inhibited the DM-induced increase of JNK (P<0.05; Fig. 5A) and p38 (P<0.05; Fig. 5B) phosphorylation.
Figure 5.

Ulinastatin treatment inhibited DM-induced phosphorylation of JNK and p38 in mice. Western blot analysis of the expression of (A) t-JNK and p-JNK, and (B) t-p38 and p-p38 in mice. *P<0.05 vs. control and #P<0.05 vs. DM. JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase; t, total; p, phosphorylated; DM, diabetes mellitus.

Discussion

In the present study, the results indicated that ulinastatin improved DM-induced cardiac dysfunction by suppressing inflammatory responses and reducing cardiomyocyte apoptosis, in part via inhibition of the MAPK signaling pathway. This indicated that the administration of ulinastatin has a protective effect in the pathophysiology of DCM. A previous study reported higher levels of ulinastatin in patients with type 1 and type 2 DM compared with healthy controls (29). The increased ulinastatin levels observed in patients with DM may reflect a systemic inflammatory state triggered by hyperglycemia, representing a marker of chronic inflammation in DM. Ulinastatin is a 143-amino acid acidic glycoprotein secreted by the liver and derived from human urine (30). Ulinastatin has been reported to have a myocardial protective effect in various I/R injury models due to its anti-inflammatory properties (31–33). Previous research revealed that ulinastatin is able to improve cardiac function in rabbits following cardiac arrest by inhibiting inflammatory responses and oxidative stress (34). It has been reported that hyperglycemia induces the activation of oxidative stress and inflammatory cascade pathways (35). In the present study, ulinastatin was demonstrated to have a myocardial protective effect in DCM by inhibiting inflammation and apoptosis. The importance of inflammation in pathogenesis of DCM is well recognized. HMGB1 is a cytokine that is upregulated in the inflammatory process (36). Extracellular HMGB1 is reported to function as an inflammatory cytokine, which is able to initiate and maintain the cascade amplification of inflammation (37). We previously demonstrated that hyperglycemia increased the expression and active secretion of HMGB1 in myocardial cells, and that inhibiting HMGB1 expression may attenuate DM-induced cardiac dysfunction (15). In the present study, HMGB1 expression was decreased in the ulinastatin treatment group compared with the untreated DM group. The results of a previous animal model of DM supported the notion that TNF-α and IL-6 serve a significant role in the inflammation response of DCM (23). The protective effect of ulinastatin may be associated with its anti-inflammatory ability. Previous research reported that ulinastatin was able to suppress the inflammatory response in mice with sepsis (38). Furthermore, ulinastatin has been reported to reduce the expression of TNF-α and IL-6 and increase levels of IL-10 and IL-13 in lung I/R injury (20,39). The results of the present study demonstrate that the expression levels of TNF-α and IL-6 were increased in the diabetic myocardium of the mice and this increase was significantly attenuated in ulinastatin-treated mice. These observations indicate that ulinastatin may protect the myocardium against DM-induced injury by inhibiting the synthesis and release of HMGB1, and downregulating TNF-α and IL-6. Apoptosis of cardiomyocytes is increased in the diabetic heart in patients and animal models, and it has been indicated to be significant in the pathogenesis of DCM (40). Myocardial apoptosis results in a loss of contractile tissue, which initiates cardiac fibrosis and remodeling (41). Bcl-2 and Bax are associated with the regulation of cell apoptosis (42); an increased ratio of Bax/Bcl-2 leads to the formation of pores in the mitochondria, release of cytochrome c, and activation of the apoptotic pathway (43). A previous study reported that ulinastatin treatment ameliorated renal dysfunction via the upregulation of Bcl-2 (13). In the present study, TUNEL staining indicated that ulinastatin treatment significantly reduced cardiomyocyte apoptosis in the diabetic myocardium. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that ulinastatin treatment reduced the DM-induced upregulation in caspase-3 activity and Bax/Bcl-2 ratio in heart. Therefore, in addition to its anti-inflammatory effect, it appears likely that the anti-apoptosis effect of ulinastatin also contributes to its protective function in the mouse model of DM. It has previously been reported that MAPKs including JNK and p-38 serve important roles in cell death and the production of cytokines (44). DM-induced heart tissue injury is associated with the activation of p38 and JNK (45). Ulinastatin also inhibits the production of TNF-α, IL-1 and IL-6, possibly via suppressing the MAPK signaling pathway (46). These pathways comprise important molecular mechanisms responsible for the inflammatory response and the activity of apoptotic kinases (47); therefore, inhibition of JNK and p38 activation may suppress the inflammatory response and limit injury. The results of the present study suggest that ulinastatin is able to reduce the phosphorylation of JNK and p38 in the diabetic heart. In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that ulinastatin has a protective role against DCM, which is achieved by the suppression of inflammation and cardiomyocyte apoptosis via the JNK and p38 signaling pathway. These results may provide a clinical basis for the use of ulinastatin as a novel therapy for the treatment of DCM.
  46 in total

1.  Isolation and characterization of cDNAs encoding the heavy chain of human inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor (I alpha TI): unambiguous evidence for multipolypeptide chain structure of I alpha TI.

Authors:  J P Salier; M Diarra-Mehrpour; R Sesboue; J Bourguignon; R Benarous; I Ohkubo; S Kurachi; K Kurachi; J P Martin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Development of a method for urine bikunin/urinary trypsin inhibitor (UTI) quantitation and structural characterization: Application to type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Antonio Junior Lepedda; Gabriele Nieddu; Silvia Rocchiccioli; Pietro Fresu; Pierina De Muro; Marilena Formato
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 3.  Mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways mediated by ERK, JNK, and p38 protein kinases.

Authors:  Gary L Johnson; Razvan Lapadat
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-12-06       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Protective effect of urinary trypsin inhibitor on the development of radiation-induced lung fibrosis in mice.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Katoh; Hitoshi Ishikawa; Masatoshi Hasegawa; Yukari Yoshida; Yoshiyuki Suzuki; Tatsuya Ohno; Takeo Takahashi; Takashi Nakano
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 2.724

5.  Protective effect of urinary trypsin inhibitor on myocardial mitochondria during hemorrhagic shock and reperfusion.

Authors:  Takashi Masuda; Kiyotaka Sato; Chiharu Noda; Kazuko M Ikeda; Atsuhiko Matsunaga; Misao N Ogura; Kazuhiko Shimizu; Hiroshi Nagasawa; Narihisa Matsuyama; Tohru Izumi
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Effects of ulinastatin on renal ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats.

Authors:  Cong-Cong Chen; Zi-Ming Liu; Hui-Hua Wang; Wei He; Yi Wang; Wei-Dong Wu
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.150

7.  Neuroprotective effect of urinary trypsin inhibitor against focal cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Yano; Sakiko Anraku; Ryosuke Nakayama; Kazuo Ushijima
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 8.  An overview of the crosstalk between inflammatory processes and metabolic dysregulation during diabetic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Xavier Palomer; Laia Salvadó; Emma Barroso; Manuel Vázquez-Carrera
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 4.164

9.  TRB3 gene silencing alleviates diabetic cardiomyopathy in a type 2 diabetic rat model.

Authors:  Yun Ti; Guo-lu Xie; Zhi-hao Wang; Xiao-lei Bi; Wen-yuan Ding; Jia Wang; Gui-Hua Jiang; Pei-Li Bu; Yun Zhang; Ming Zhong; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 9.461

10.  Ulinastatin preconditioning attenuates inflammatory reaction of hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury in rats via high mobility group box 1(HMGB1) inhibition.

Authors:  Ying Tong; Zhaohui Tang; Tian Yang; Yuting Yang; Liqun Yang; Weixing Shen; Weixin Chen
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.738

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Research progress of ulinastatin in the treatment of liver diseases.

Authors:  Shangping Fang; Pengfei Li; Chenxu Zhu; Xiaoxiao Han; Pengju Bao; Wenjun Guo
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2020-11-01

2.  Inflammation is related to preoperative hypoxemia in patients with acute Stanford type A aortic dissection.

Authors:  Xu-Zhou Duan; Zhi-Yun Xu; Fang-Lin Lu; Lin Han; Yang-Feng Tang; Hao Tang; Yang Liu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Metoprolol and bisoprolol ameliorate hypertrophy of neonatal rat cardiomyocytes induced by high glucose via the PKC/NF-κB/c-fos signaling pathway.

Authors:  Min Wang; Qingbo Lv; Liding Zhao; Yao Wang; Yi Luan; Zhengwei Li; Guosheng Fu; Wenbin Zhang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Activation of NRF2/FPN1 pathway attenuates myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in diabetic rats by regulating iron homeostasis and ferroptosis.

Authors:  Hao Tian; Yonghong Xiong; Yi Zhang; Yan Leng; Jie Tao; Lu Li; Zhen Qiu; Zhongyuan Xia
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 3.667

5.  Combination of Glutamine and Ulinastatin Treatments Greatly Improves Sepsis Outcomes.

Authors:  Junyan Wang; Jiahui Zhou; Shuancheng Bai
Journal:  J Inflamm Res       Date:  2020-02-19

6.  Ulinastatin Reduces the Severity of Intestinal Damage in the Neonatal Rat Model of Necrotizing Enterocolitis.

Authors:  Shuxia Liang; Panjian Lai; Xiaobing Li; Jie Xu; Yunguang Bao; Yuanshu Fang; Mingxing Ding
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-12-01

7.  Efficacy of Ulinastatin and Sulforaphane Alone or in Combination in Rat Model of Streptozotocin Diabetes Induced Vascular Dementia.

Authors:  Poonam Sharma; Prachi Kaushik; Swati Jain; Brij Mohan Sharma; Rajendra Awasthi; Giriraj Thirupathirao Kulkarni; Bhupesh Sharma
Journal:  Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 2.582

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.