| Literature DB >> 28962127 |
Wei Wang1,2,3, Jin Hou4, Deyong Lv5, Wen Liang1, Xinqing Jiang2, Hongbin Han3, Xianyue Quan1.
Abstract
The present study investigated the application of the T1ρ and T2 relaxation mapping magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the evaluation of intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD). A total of 93 asymptomatic subjects were imaged with T1ρ and T2 mapping, as well as DWI. Pfirrmann grading was performed and correlation analysis was conducted for T1ρ, T2 and DWI results with the grading results and age. Pfirrmann grading indicated 69 cases of grade I, 240 cases of grade II, 101 cases of grade III, 43 cases of grade IV and 12 cases of grade V. MRI showed that the T1ρ values of the nucleus pulposi at L4/5 and L5/S1 were significantly reduced (P<0.05) and no significant differences were observed in the T2 values compared with the values of the nucleus pulposus at L1/2, L2/3 and L3/4. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of L1/2 were significantly decreased from L2/3 and L3/4 (P<0.05). Correlation analysis revealed that the T1ρ, T, and ADC values were positively correlated with each other. Moreover, the T1ρvalues were significantly decreased with the increase of Pfirrmann grades (P<0.05), with the exception of grades IV and V. However, T2 and ADC values were not significantly different between grades I and II or IV and V. In addition, the T1ρ, T2 and ADC values were significantly decreased with the increase of age in patients with IDD (P<0.05). T1ρ and T2 mapping and DWI are promising techniques for the in vivo diagnosis of IDD, which may be useful in determining the appropriate prevention and treatment options for the disease.Entities:
Keywords: T1ρ; T2; diffusion-weighted imaging; intervertebral disc degeneration; magnetic resonance imaging
Year: 2017 PMID: 28962127 PMCID: PMC5609182 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2017.4786
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Figure 1.Schematic diagram of regions of interest. Regions of interest were selected as the rectangular areas with equal sizes at each disc level in the center sagittal planes.
Inter- and intra-observer reliability analysis of Pfirrmann grading.
| Disagreement | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreement | I | II | III | IV | V | ||||||||
| Variable | Kappa | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % |
| Interobserver reliability | 0.886 | 444 | 95.5 | 8 | 11.6 | 17 | 7.1 | 6 | 5.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Intraobserver reliability | |||||||||||||
| Radiologist 1 | 0.938 | 446 | 95.9 | 6 | 8.7 | 7 | 3.9 | 6 | 5.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Radiologist 2 | 0.930 | 445 | 95.6 | 9 | 13.0 | 7 | 3.9 | 4 | 3.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Figure 2.Magnetic resonance imaging results of lumber intervertebral discs. (A) Representative pictures of magnetic resonance imaging. (a) T2-weighted imaging of L4/5 and L5/S1 assessed as grade III, showing the gray nucleus and the unclear distinction of nucleus and annulus, without collapsed disc space (indicated by arrows). Discs at other levels were grade II. The value-based color-scale images displayed the spatial distribution of the (b) T1ρ, (c) T2 and (d) ADC values of discs and were overlaid on the T2WI image. As shown by the color scale bar, the values increased from dark to white, that was, blue indicated the lower value and red indicated the higher values. (B) The mean T1ρ, (C) T2 and (D) ADC values in magnetic resonance imaging of lumbar intervertebral discs at each level. *P<0.05. ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient.
Figure 3.Correlation analysis of magnetic resonance imaging. Scatter plots from the correlation analysis between the (A) T1ρ and T2 values (B), T1ρ and ADC values and (C) T2 and ADC values in magnetic resonance imaging. ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient.
T1ρ, T2, and ADC values of nucleus pulposus with different Pfirrmann grades.
| Parameter | Grade I | Grade II | Grade III | Grade IV | Grade V | Spearman |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1ρ (msec) | 131.38±28.30 | 120.74±33.49[ | 93.24±30.20[ | 68.56±22.25[ | 64.88±16.54 | rs=−0.561 P<0.01 |
| T2 (msec) | 121.45±19.15 | 113.60±19.75 | 83.54±19.13[ | 55.26±10.79[ | 59.09±21.62 | rs=−0.690 P<0.01 |
| ADC (×10−3 mm2/sec) | 1.764±0.212 | 1.692±0.189 | 1.564±0.211[ | 1.263±0.309[ | 1.156±0.392 | rs=−0.530 P<0.01 |
P<0.05 vs. grade I
P<0.01 vs. grade II
P<0.01 vs. grade III. ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient.
Figure 4.Receiver operating curve analysis of magnetic resonance imaging. Receiver operating curves of (A) T1ρ, (B) T2 and (C) ADC values in diagnosing intervertebral disc degeneration with different Pfirrmann grades (I–IV). ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient.
Receiver operating curve analysis of magnetic resonance imaging.
| Parameter | Pfirrmann grades | Area under curve | Cut-off value | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1ρ | I–II | 0.624 | 116.5 msec | 70.0 | 53.6 |
| II–III | 0.730 | 103.5 msec | 66.8 | 68.6 | |
| III–IV | 0.740 | 86.5 msec | 58.1 | 79.1 | |
| T2 | II–III | 0.871 | 94.5 msec | 83.7 | 73.9 |
| III–IV | 0.910 | 67.5 msec | 76.1 | 99.3 | |
| Apparent diffusion coefficient | II–III | 0.670 | 1.732×10−3 mm2/sec | 48.2 | 81.8 |
| III–IV | 0.801 | 1.587×10−3 mm2/sec | 60.0 | 88.2 |
Figure 5.Correlation analysis of T1ρ, T2, and ADC values with age. (A) Mean T1ρ, (B) T2 and (C) ADC values of subjects with different ages. ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient.