Literature DB >> 28961894

Serum levels, safety and tolerability of new formulation SUBA-itraconazole prophylaxis in patients with haematological malignancy or undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Julian Lindsay1, Indy Sandaradura2,3, Kelly Wong1, Chris Arthur1, William Stevenson1,4, Ian Kerridge1,4, Keith Fay1, Luke Coyle1, Matthew Greenwood1,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess therapeutic levels, safety and tolerability of a novel formulation SUBA-itraconazole (where SUBA stands for SUper BioAvailability) when compared with conventional itraconazole liquid when used as antifungal prophylaxis in patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT or in haematological malignancy patients with an intermediate/high risk of invasive fungal infection (IFI).
METHODS: This was a single-institution, prospective cohort study using a historical control group as the comparator.
RESULTS: A total of 57 patients were assessed: 27 in the SUBA-itraconazole cohort and 30 in the liquid itraconazole cohort. Therapeutic concentrations were achieved significantly more quickly in the SUBA-itraconazole group: median of 6 (95% CI 5-11) days versus 14 (95% CI 12-21) days in the liquid itraconazole group (P < 0.0001). At day 10, therapeutic concentrations were achieved in 69% (95% CI 44%-81%) of the SUBA-itraconazole group versus 21% (95% CI 7%-33%) of the liquid itraconazole group (P < 0.0001). The mean trough serum concentrations at steady-state of SUBA-itraconazole were significantly higher, with less interpatient variability [1577 ng/mL, coefficient of variation (CV) 35%] versus liquid itraconazole (1218 ng/mL, CV 60%) (P < 0.001). There were two (7.4%) treatment failures in the SUBA-itraconazole group, both due to cessation of therapy for mucositis, compared with seven (23.3%) treatment failures in the liquid itraconazole group, due to subtherapeutic levels (five), mucositis (one) and gastrointestinal intolerance (one) (P = 0.096).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of the SUBA-itraconazole formulation was associated with more rapid attainment of therapeutic levels with less interpatient variability compared with conventional liquid itraconazole when used as IFI prophylaxis in allogeneic HSCT or intermediate-/high-IFI risk haematological malignancy patients.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28961894     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkx295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  10 in total

1.  Effects of Food and Omeprazole on a Novel Formulation of Super Bioavailability Itraconazole in Healthy Subjects.

Authors:  Julian Lindsay; Stuart Mudge; George R Thompson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Bioavailability of Single-Dose SUBA-Itraconazole Compared to Conventional Itraconazole under Fasted and Fed Conditions.

Authors:  Adriana M Rauseo; Patrick Mazi; Phoebe Lewis; Bruce Burnett; Stuart Mudge; Andrej Spec
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Current and promising pharmacotherapeutic options for candidiasis.

Authors:  Liliana Scorzoni; Beth Burgwyn Fuchs; Juliana Campos Junqueira; Eleftherios Mylonakis
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.889

4.  Trough concentration of itraconazole and its relationship with efficacy and safety: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jingru Zhang; Yiwei Liu; Xiaolu Nie; Yuncui Yu; Jian Gu; Libo Zhao
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 5.  The Rise of Coccidioides: Forces Against the Dust Devil Unleashed.

Authors:  Marley C Caballero Van Dyke; George R Thompson; John N Galgiani; Bridget M Barker
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 7.561

6.  Open-Label Crossover Oral Bioequivalence Pharmacokinetics Comparison for a 3-Day Loading Dose Regimen and 15-Day Steady-State Administration of SUBA-Itraconazole and Conventional Itraconazole Capsules in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  George R Thompson; Phoebe Lewis; Stuart Mudge; Thomas F Patterson; Bruce P Burnett
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  An Open-Label, Randomized, Double-Arm Clinical Trial to Compare the Effectiveness and Safety of Super Bioavailable Itraconazole Capsules and Itraconazole Capsules in the Management of Dermatophytosis in India.

Authors:  Manjunath Shenoy; Dhiraj Dhoot; Harshal Mahajan; Hanmant Barkate
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2021-09-27

8.  SUBA-Itraconazole for Primary Antifungal Prophylaxis After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

Authors:  Julian Lindsay; Jad Othman; Yvonne Kong; Annie Yip; Sebastiaan Van Hal; Stephen Larsen; Christian Bryant; John Gibson; Ian Kerridge; Keith Fay; William Stevenson; Chris Arthur; Sharon C A Chen; David C M Kong; Matthew Greenwood; Steven A Pergam; Catherine Liu; Monica A Slavin
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 4.423

9.  Influence of Gender, Body Mass Index, and Age on the Pharmacokinetics of Itraconazole in Healthy Subjects: Non-Compartmental Versus Compartmental Analysis.

Authors:  Milijana N Miljković; Nemanja Rančić; Aleksandra Kovačević; Bojana Cikota-Aleksić; Ivan Skadrić; Vesna Jaćević; Momir Mikov; Viktorija Dragojević-Simić
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 5.988

10.  Coccidioidomycosis: Epidemiology, Fungal Pathogenesis, and Therapeutic Development.

Authors:  Hazael Hernandez; Victor H Erives; Luis R Martinez
Journal:  Curr Trop Med Rep       Date:  2019-06-14
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.