| Literature DB >> 28961665 |
Allan Abbass1, Patrick Luyten, Christiane Steinert, Falk Leichsenring.
Abstract
Although psychodynamic therapy (PDT) is an evidence-based intervention for a broad spectrum of psychiatric conditions, there is often notable bias in the way PDT is depicted both in the popular media and in the scientific literature. This has contributed to a negative view of PDT, which hampers both patient access to this treatment and researcher access to funding for further research on PDT. The adverse effects of these distortions and biases are detrimental not only to PDT but also to the overall field of psychotherapy, raising questions about its credibility. Here we summarize current evidence for PDT, describe existing biases, and formulate a set of recommendations to foster a more balanced perspective on PDT.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28961665 DOI: 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000256
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Psychiatr Pract ISSN: 1527-4160 Impact factor: 1.325