Literature DB >> 28961665

Bias Toward Psychodynamic Therapy: Framing the Problem and Working Toward a Solution.

Allan Abbass1, Patrick Luyten, Christiane Steinert, Falk Leichsenring.   

Abstract

Although psychodynamic therapy (PDT) is an evidence-based intervention for a broad spectrum of psychiatric conditions, there is often notable bias in the way PDT is depicted both in the popular media and in the scientific literature. This has contributed to a negative view of PDT, which hampers both patient access to this treatment and researcher access to funding for further research on PDT. The adverse effects of these distortions and biases are detrimental not only to PDT but also to the overall field of psychotherapy, raising questions about its credibility. Here we summarize current evidence for PDT, describe existing biases, and formulate a set of recommendations to foster a more balanced perspective on PDT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28961665     DOI: 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatr Pract        ISSN: 1527-4160            Impact factor:   1.325


  2 in total

Review 1.  Moving Forward While Standing Still: A Case of Mental Health Advocacy Evolving in the Time of COVID-19.

Authors:  Renata M Villela; Susan G Lazar
Journal:  J Psychiatr Pract       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 1.841

2.  "Gold Standards," Plurality and Monocultures: The Need for Diversity in Psychotherapy.

Authors:  Falk Leichsenring; Allan Abbass; Mark J Hilsenroth; Patrick Luyten; Thomas Munder; Sven Rabung; Christiane Steinert
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 4.157

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.