Literature DB >> 28960928

Surgery for constipation: systematic review and practice recommendations: Results III: Rectal wall excisional procedures (Rectal Excision).

M Mercer-Jones1, U Grossi2, D Pares3, P F Vollebregt2, J Mason4, C H Knowles2.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess the outcomes of rectal excisional procedures in adults with chronic constipation.
METHOD: Standardised methods and reporting of benefits and harms were used for all CapaCiTY reviews that closely adhered to PRISMA 2016 guidance. Main conclusions were presented as summary evidence statements with a summative Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (2009) level.
RESULTS: Forty-seven studies were identified, providing data on outcomes in 8340 patients. Average length of procedures was 44 min and length of stay (LOS) was 3 days. There was inadequate evidence to determine variations in procedural duration or LOS by type of procedure. Overall morbidity rate was 16.9% (0-61%), with lower rates observed after Contour Transtar procedure (8.9%). No mortality was reported after any procedures in a total of 5896 patients. Although inconsistently reported, good or satisfactory outcome occurred in 73-80% of patients; a reduction of 53-91% in Longo scoring system for obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS) occurred in about 68-76% of patients. The most common long-term adverse outcome is faecal urgency, typically occurring in up to 10% of patients. Recurrent prolapse occurred in 4.3% of patients. Patients with at least 3 ODS symptoms together with a rectocoele with or without an intussusception, who have failed conservative management, may benefit from a rectal excisional procedure.
CONCLUSION: Rectal excisional procedures are safe with little major morbidity. It is not possible to advise which excisional technique is superior from the point of view of efficacy, peri-operative variables, or harms. Future study is required.
© 2017 The Authors. Colorectal Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  STARR; TRANSTAR; constipation; rectal excision; surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28960928     DOI: 10.1111/codi.13772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  4 in total

1.  Recalled stapler device, high complication rate, non validated scoring system and misquote from the STARR surgeons.

Authors:  U Grossi; M Mercer-Jones; G L Di Tanna; C H Knowles
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 2.  Faecal incontinence in adults.

Authors:  Adil E Bharucha; Charles H Knowles; Isabelle Mack; Allison Malcolm; Nicholas Oblizajek; Satish Rao; S Mark Scott; Andrea Shin; Paul Enck
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 65.038

3.  Pneumoretroperitoneum after a STARR Procedure Performed One Year after a Posterior Colporrhaphy: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Ibrahim Darwich; Badrig Melekian; Serpil Demirel-Darwich; Frank Willeke
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2020-11-19

4.  Anorectal angle at rest predicting successful sacral nerve stimulation in idiopathic fecal incontinence-a cohort analysis.

Authors:  Cathérine T Kollmann; Elise B Pretzsch; Andreas Kunz; Christoph Isbert; Katica Krajinovic; Joachim Reibetanz; Mia Kim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 2.571

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.