Literature DB >> 28960597

Ideal Cricoid Pressure Is Biomechanically Impossible During Laryngoscopy.

Christopher E Trethewy1,2,3, Steven R Doherty4,5, Julie M Burrows2, Don Clausen6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was a prospective, randomized controlled trial of rapid sequence intubation (RSI) with cricoid pressure (CP) within the emergency department (ED). The primary aim of the study was to examine the link between ideal CP and the incidence of aspiration.
METHOD: Patients > 18 years of age undergoing RSI in the ED of two hospitals in New South Wales, Australia, were randomly assigned to receive measured CP using weighing scales to target the ideal CP range (3.060-4.075 kg) or control CP where the weighing scales were used, but the CP operator was blinded to the amount of CP applied during the RSI. A data logger recorded all CP delivered during each RSI. Immediately after intubation, tracheal and esophageal samples were taken and underwent pepsin analysis.
RESULTS: Fifty-four RSIs were analyzed (25 measured/29 control). Macroscopic contamination of the larynx at RSI was observed in 14 patients (26%). During induction (0-50 seconds), both groups delivered in-range CP. During intubation (51-223 seconds), laryngoscopy was associated with a reduction in mean CP below 3.060 kg in both groups. When compared, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups. For 11 patients, pepsin was detected in the oropharyngeal sample, while three were positive for tracheal pepsin. Seven patients (four control/three measured) were treated for clinical aspiration during hospitalization. As a result of the finding that neither group could maintain ideal range CP during laryngoscopy, the trial was abandoned.
CONCLUSION: Laryngoscopy provides a counter force to CP, which is negated to facilitate tracheal intubation. The concept that a static 3.060 to 4.075 kg CP could be maintained during laryngoscopy and intubation was rejected by our study. Whether a lower CP range could prevent aspiration during RSI was not explored by this study.
© 2017 The Authors Academic Emergency Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28960597     DOI: 10.1111/acem.13326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  2 in total

1.  Inclusion of older adults and reporting of consent processes in randomized controlled trials in the emergency department: A scoping review.

Authors:  Lauren T Southerland; Katherine K Benson; Austin J Schoeffler; Margaret A Lashutka; Soo Borson; Jason J Bischof
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2022-07-29

Review 2.  Review article: Effectiveness and risks of cricoid pressure during rapid sequence induction for endotracheal intubation in the emergency department: A systematic review.

Authors:  Ella Tessarolo; Hatem Alkhouri; Nicholas Lelos; Pooria Sarrami; Sally McCarthy
Journal:  Emerg Med Australas       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 2.279

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.