Literature DB >> 28960564

Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in advanced cutaneous melanoma patients in France.

B Sassolas1, M T Leccia2, C Godard3, L Benmahamed3, A Flinois4, L Levy-Bachelot3, C Bédane5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since 2011, the management of advanced melanoma has radically changed with the availability of new therapies (immunotherapy and BRAF-targeted therapy) and with BRAF testing.
OBJECTIVES: Following the introduction of these new therapies, the objectives of this AMEL study were to describe treatment patterns and evaluate overall survival (OS) among unresectable stage III/IV melanoma patients, in a real-life setting in France.
METHODS: The AMEL study is a multicentre retrospective record review study. Thirty-three physicians working in 33 unique treatment centres participated in the study. Two hundred and sixty-four patients diagnosed between 1 January 2012 and 31 October 2012 with unresectable stage III/IV melanoma were included in the study.
RESULTS: 94.7% of the patients received a first-line antitumour drug treatment, 62.5% a second-line treatment while 26.9% received a third-line treatment with no significant differences between patients with a BRAF mutation (50.4%) and BRAF wild type (47.0%). First-line treatment differs according to the BRAF status: 74.8% of patients with a BRAF mutation received a BRAF inhibitor while 79.3% of the BRAF wild-type patients were treated with conventional chemotherapy. In second line and over, the treatment patterns were more heterogeneous, depending on the BRAF mutation, the treatment received previously, the speed of progression of the disease and the availability of immunotherapy at the time the treatment was initiated.
CONCLUSION: Regardless of the BRAF mutation status, the median OS of patients was 16 months (95% CI = 14-18). Compared to a similar study conducted in 2007 (MELODY), a gain of 4 months is observed. The gain seems to be higher for patients with a BRAF mutation (18 months) than for those without a BRAF mutation (14 months). The OS of patients who sequentially received both a BRAF inhibitor and ipilimumab (28 months) highlights the benefit of this treatment sequence.
© 2017 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28960564     DOI: 10.1111/jdv.14606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol        ISSN: 0926-9959            Impact factor:   6.166


  3 in total

1.  Combining BRAF/MEK Inhibitors with Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Metastatic Melanoma.

Authors:  Dimitrios C Ziogas; Frosso Konstantinou; Spyros Bouros; Maria Theochari; Helen Gogas
Journal:  Am J Clin Dermatol       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 7.403

2.  Epigenomic and genomic analysis of transcriptome modulation in skin cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Wuzhen Chen; Pu Cheng; Jingxin Jiang; Yunqing Ren; Dang Wu; Dan Xue
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 5.682

3.  Treatment patterns of melanoma by BRAF mutation status in the USA from 2011 to 2017: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Shweta Shah; Leon Raskin; David Cohan; Omid Hamid; Morganna L Freeman
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2019-11-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.