Jurgis Karuza1,2,3, Suzanne M Gillespie1,2, Tobie Olsan1,4, Xeuya Cai5, Stuti Dang6, Orna Intrator1,7, Jiejin Li5, Shan Gao5, Bruce Kinosian8,9, Thomas Edes10. 1. Canandaigua Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Canandaigua, New York. 2. Division of Geriatrics, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York. 3. Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Buffalo State, Buffalo, New York. 4. School of Nursing, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York. 5. Department of Biostatistics, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York. 6. Miami Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Miami, Florida. 7. Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York. 8. Division of Geriatrics, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 9. Geriatrics and Extended Care Data Analysis Center, Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 10. Geriatrics and Extended Care, Office of Clinical Operations and Management, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, District of Columbia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To describe the current structural and practice characteristics of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Home-Based Primary Care (HBPC) program. DESIGN: We designed a national survey and surveyed HBPC program directors on-line using REDCap. PARTICIPANTS: We received 236 surveys from 394 identified HBPC sites (60% response rate). MEASUREMENTS: HBPC site characteristics were quantified using closed-ended formats. RESULTS: HBPC program directors were most often registered nurses, and HBPC programs primarily served veterans with complex chronic illnesses that were at high risk of hospitalization and nursing home care. Primary care was delivered using interdisciplinary teams, with nurses, social workers, and registered dietitians as team members in more than 90% of the sites. Most often, nurse practitioners were the principal primary care providers (PCPs), typically working with nurse case managers. Nearly 60% of the sites reported dual PCPs involving VA and community-based physicians. Nearly all sites provided access to a core set of comprehensive services and programs (e.g., case management, supportive home health care). At the same time, there were variations according to site (e.g., size, location (urban, rural), use of non-VA hospitals, primary care models used). CONCLUSION: HBPC sites reflected the rationale and mission of HBPC by focusing on complex chronic illness of home-based veterans and providing comprehensive primary care using interdisciplinary teams. Our next series of studies will examine how HBPC site structural characteristics and care models are related to the processes and outcomes of care to determine whether there are best practice standards that define an optimal HBPC structure and care model or whether multiple approaches to HBPC better serve the needs of veterans. Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
OBJECTIVES: To describe the current structural and practice characteristics of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Home-Based Primary Care (HBPC) program. DESIGN: We designed a national survey and surveyed HBPC program directors on-line using REDCap. PARTICIPANTS: We received 236 surveys from 394 identified HBPC sites (60% response rate). MEASUREMENTS: HBPC site characteristics were quantified using closed-ended formats. RESULTS: HBPC program directors were most often registered nurses, and HBPC programs primarily served veterans with complex chronic illnesses that were at high risk of hospitalization and nursing home care. Primary care was delivered using interdisciplinary teams, with nurses, social workers, and registered dietitians as team members in more than 90% of the sites. Most often, nurse practitioners were the principal primary care providers (PCPs), typically working with nurse case managers. Nearly 60% of the sites reported dual PCPs involving VA and community-based physicians. Nearly all sites provided access to a core set of comprehensive services and programs (e.g., case management, supportive home health care). At the same time, there were variations according to site (e.g., size, location (urban, rural), use of non-VA hospitals, primary care models used). CONCLUSION: HBPC sites reflected the rationale and mission of HBPC by focusing on complex chronic illness of home-based veterans and providing comprehensive primary care using interdisciplinary teams. Our next series of studies will examine how HBPC site structural characteristics and care models are related to the processes and outcomes of care to determine whether there are best practice standards that define an optimal HBPC structure and care model or whether multiple approaches to HBPC better serve the needs of veterans. Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Authors: Kali S Thomas; Emily Corneau; Courtney H Van Houtven; Portia Cornell; David Aron; David M Dosa; Susan M Allen Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2021-02-25 Impact factor: 3.734