Literature DB >> 28959705

Patient outcomes influenced by reduced lymphocyte counts after dimethyl fumarate initiation.

Katy Wright1, Mandy D Winkler1, Braeden D Newton1, Maria Pia Sormani1, Darin T Okuda1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the temporal profile of absolute and lymphocyte subset data from dimethyl fumarate (DMF) start and relationships to disease behavior.
METHODS: A retrospective study performed on patients with an existing diagnosis of MS and a history of DMF exposure from a single MS center. Demographic, laboratory, and corresponding clinical relapse and MRI data were recorded from baseline and in 3-4-month intervals after treatment initiation extending to 3 years. The Spearman rank coefficient and mixed-effects models were used to assess longitudinal correlations between cell counts and measures of disease activity.
RESULTS: A total of 292 patients with MS (228 women; median age at DMF initiation: 40.6 years, range: 16.1-66.7 years) were identified. An increased risk of disease activity was associated with higher absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) values at 3 months (p = 0.001, OR: 1.82) and at 6 months (p = 0.032, hazard ratio: 1.73). A reduced risk of disease evolution in patients with lower ALC values < 1,200 cells/μL compared with midtier (1,210-1,800 cells/μL) and the highest tertile (>1,810 cells/μL) was observed (p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Reductions in ALC values at months 3 and 6 after treatment initiation appear to be associated with improved clinical and radiologic outcomes. These data alone may help to provide a better understanding of both the safety and efficacy of DMF.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28959705      PMCID: PMC5614725          DOI: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm        ISSN: 2332-7812


Dimethyl fumarate (DMF), marketed commercially as Tecfidera, is a twice-daily, oral disease-modifying therapy approved for the treatment of relapsing-remitting MS. While the exact mechanism of action is not entirely understood, DMF is known to cause reductions in white blood cell (WBC) count and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) values. Mean ALC reductions of approximately 30% were previously observed within the first year of treatment.[1] Significant ALC reductions were also described, resulting in grade III lymphopenia (ALC <500 cells/μL) in approximately 5% of patients.[1] Recent studies have also reported reductions in T cells and B cells.[2,3] Several cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) have occurred in DMF-treated patients with sustained lymphopenia (>6 months). While most cases have occurred in patients with ALC <500 cells/μL, fumarate-related PML has developed with ALC values as high as 792 cells/μL, highlighting the need for careful surveillance.[4-6] Like many immunomodulatory treatments, DMF influences several targets, having anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties along with neuroprotective effects.[7,8] However, this does not completely explain reductions in ALCs and lymphocyte subsets.[2,3] As T cells and B cells contribute to MS pathogenesis, it is conceivable that some degree of therapeutic effect could be related to decreases in these cell counts. This investigation aimed to evaluate the temporal profile of absolute and lymphocyte subset changes following exposure to DMF and the relationship between these features and clinical and radiologic measures of disease.

METHODS

Clinical subjects.

A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients with relapsing-remitting MS and a history of DMF exposure at the Clinical Center for Multiple Sclerosis at UT Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, Texas. This study was approved by the UT Southwestern Medical Center Institutional Review Board. Demographic and laboratory data, including WBC, ALC, CD3, CD4, CD8, natural killer (NK), and CD19 cell counts, and corresponding clinical relapse and MRI data were recorded as part of routine management. Data were obtained at baseline and serially in 3–4-month intervals after treatment extending to 3 years (table 1). MRI data were acquired prior to DMF initiation, 6 months after treatment, and annually thereafter. Disease progression was defined by the presence of new or old neurologic symptom attributable to CNS demyelination, persisting for >24 hours in the absence of fever or infection, or new (>3 mm2) or enlarging lesions observed on repeat imaging of the brain or spinal cord. Clinical relapses and new radiologic activity were verified by the treating provider. Clinical relapse data were not included if they occurred within the first 3 months of treatment. Radiologic advancement was scored only if new imaging features supportive of in situ demyelination were observed between the 6-month post-DMF MRI and subsequent imaging studies.
Table 1

Summary of data available at each time point for leukocyte counts, absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs), and each subpopulation

Summary of data available at each time point for leukocyte counts, absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs), and each subpopulation

Statistical analysis.

Correlations between ALCs and clinical outcomes were evaluated by the Spearman rank coefficient. Mixed linear models were used to assess the time course of ALC changes over multiple time points and the longitudinal correlation of ALCs to patient outcome data. The association between the ALC and time to a first clinical relapse or radiologic advancement was assessed by a Cox model, and Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to display the results. p Value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Not all patients completed scheduled serologic assessments or remained on therapy for ≥3 months. If ALC values were missing at month 6, ALC values from month 3 were imputed for those who remained on therapy to increase the available data in the survival analysis.

RESULTS

Data were collected on 295 patients with relapsing-remitting MS exposed to DMF. Three patients were excluded because of insufficient laboratory and imaging assessments. A total of 292 patients served as the study cohort (228 women [78%], median age at DMF start date: 40.6 years, range: 16.1–66.7). The median disease duration at DMF initiation was 4.5 years (0.0–34.9) (table 2).
Table 2

Demographic and clinical characteristic data of the study cohort

Demographic and clinical characteristic data of the study cohort A correlation between WBC and ALC (r = 0.46, p < 0.001), CD3 (r = 0.66, p < 0.001), CD4 (r = 0.60, p < 0.001), CD8 (r = 0.49, p < 0.001), and CD19 (r = 0.55, p = 0.009) was found at baseline. At 6 months, a correlation between WBC and ALC (r = 0.56, p < 0.001), CD3 (r = 0.49, p = 0.001), CD4 (r = 0.44, p = 0.004), CD8 (r = 0.50, p = 0.001), CD19 (r = 0.52, p = 0.023), and NK (r = 0.47, p = 0.048) cells was identified. In addition, a relationship between NK cells and ALC (r = 0.66, p = 0.003), CD3 (r = 0.51, p = 0.032), and CD4 (r = 0.53, p = 0.026) was observed at 6 months. Changes between baseline and 9 months were observed in WBC (monthly loss [β]: −0.14, p < 0.001), ALC (β: −0.09, p < 0.001), CD3 (β: −71.1, p < 0.001), CD4 (β: −43.2, p < 0.001), and CD8 counts(β: −21.7, p < 0.001). A longitudinal correlation between CD4 and CD19 subsets during the first 9 months of treatment was found (p < 0.001). Time to first relapse was measured in accordance with ALCs at baseline (n = 247), 3 (n = 148), and 6 months (n = 118). A greater risk of relapse was associated with higher ALCs at 3 months (p = 0.001, hazard ratio [HR]: 1.82) and 6 months (p = 0.032, HR: 1.73). When considering patients with lymphocyte counts at 6 months (n = 207), a decline in relapse-free survival was seen in patients with higher ALC values even after adjusting for age, sex, previous disease-modifying therapy (DMT) exposure, prior treatment type, and disease duration. Examination by tertile indicated a reduced risk in patients with lower ALC values < 1,200 cells/μL compared with midtier (1,210–1,800 cells/μL) and the highest tertile (>1,810 cells/μL) (p = 0.01) (figure).
Figure

Temporal profile of lymphocyte subsets and their relationship with clinical and radiologic measures of disease

Significant reductions in white blood cell count and lymphocyte subsets were observed from baseline to 9 months (A; box plots display the mean and SD at each time point). Case processing summary demonstrating the time to first relapse according to absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs) at months 3 and 6 after dimethyl fumarate initiation along with the number of clinical and radiologic events identified by ALC thresholds (B). The time to a first new clinical or radiologic event was extended when ALCs were reduced at 3 and 6 months, independent of baseline lymphocyte values and key baseline demographic and clinical data. NK = natural killer.

Temporal profile of lymphocyte subsets and their relationship with clinical and radiologic measures of disease

Significant reductions in white blood cell count and lymphocyte subsets were observed from baseline to 9 months (A; box plots display the mean and SD at each time point). Case processing summary demonstrating the time to first relapse according to absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs) at months 3 and 6 after dimethyl fumarate initiation along with the number of clinical and radiologic events identified by ALC thresholds (B). The time to a first new clinical or radiologic event was extended when ALCs were reduced at 3 and 6 months, independent of baseline lymphocyte values and key baseline demographic and clinical data. NK = natural killer.

DISCUSSION

Our findings revealed a meaningful reduction in total WBC counts, ALCs, and all lymphocyte subsets as soon as 3 months following DMF initiation; this pattern continued the first 9 months of treatment at which time counts began to plateau. The temporal profile of ALC changes also correlated with T- and B-cell subset data. Longitudinal correlations between CD4 and CD19 counts at baseline and month 9 of treatment were observed, suggesting that the clinical surveillance of patients may be effectively managed without lymphocyte subsets. Our data suggest that laboratory assessments every 6 months are likely sufficient for the routine management of patients without lymphopenia, given the propensity for ALC values to stabilize after 9 months of treatment, which is in alignment with current package insert recommendations. Beyond our observations to improve on the efficiency of the management of patients with MS treated with DMF, we identified an association between ALC values and clinical and radiologic markers of disease. Reductions in ALCs at months 3 and 6 after treatment were associated with improved clinical and radiologic outcomes independent of baseline lymphocyte counts, and ALCs >1,800 cells/μL were more strongly associated with new disease behavior. This observation differs from previously published data that excluded new MRI activity in the definition of disease evolution and compared those with lymphopenia (≥1 ALC < LLN) to those without (all ALCs ≥ LLN).[9] The other study correlated outcomes with lymphopenia grades alone.[10] Our findings may provide a more refined estimate of the association between ALC values and clinical response, understanding the potential compromise between safety and efficacy. Our findings are limited by an assumption of full patient compliance with DMF, as objective measures of medication utilization beyond clinical inquiries during office visits were not used. Consequently, disease behavior measured by clinical and radiologic metrics could have been influenced by the degree of medication compliance. A modest number of clinical and radiologic events in total (n = 45), the lack of systematically acquired neuroimaging studies and scheduled clinical assessments, and the use of multiple commercial laboratories to acquire data serve as potential limiting factors. Finally, prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings. These data aid in refining surveillance recommendations and highlight the importance of diligent monitoring of ALCs especially within the first 9 months of treatment. ALCs alone may provide a better understanding of both the safety and therapeutic effect of DMF.
  9 in total

1.  PML in a patient without severe lymphocytopenia receiving dimethyl fumarate.

Authors:  Dennis J Nieuwkamp; Jean-Luc Murk; Bob W van Oosten; Charlotte H P Cremers; Joep Killestein; Marco C Viveen; Wim Van Hecke; Daphne W Frijlink; Mike P Wattjes
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  PML during dimethyl fumarate treatment of multiple sclerosis: How does lymphopenia matter?

Authors:  Klaus Lehmann-Horn; Horst Penkert; Peter Grein; Ulrich Leppmeier; Sarah Teuber-Hanselmann; Bernhard Hemmer; Achim Berthele
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Dimethyl fumarate associated lymphopenia in clinical practice.

Authors:  Erin E Longbrake; Anne H Cross
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 6.312

4.  Placebo-controlled phase 3 study of oral BG-12 or glatiramer in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Robert J Fox; David H Miller; J Theodore Phillips; Michael Hutchinson; Eva Havrdova; Mariko Kita; Minhua Yang; Kartik Raghupathi; Mark Novas; Marianne T Sweetser; Vissia Viglietta; Katherine T Dawson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Effects of dimethyl fumarate on lymphocyte subsets.

Authors:  Regina Berkovich; Leslie P Weiner
Journal:  Mult Scler Relat Disord       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 4.339

6.  Dimethyl fumarate treatment induces adaptive and innate immune modulation independent of Nrf2.

Authors:  Ulf Schulze-Topphoff; Michel Varrin-Doyer; Kara Pekarek; Collin M Spencer; Aparna Shetty; Sharon A Sagan; Bruce A C Cree; Raymond A Sobel; Brian T Wipke; Lawrence Steinman; Robert H Scannevin; Scott S Zamvil
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Effects of dimethyl fumarate on neuroprotection and immunomodulation.

Authors:  Philipp Albrecht; Imane Bouchachia; Norbert Goebels; Nadine Henke; Harald H Hofstetter; Andrea Issberner; Zsuzsa Kovacs; Jan Lewerenz; Dmitrij Lisak; Pamela Maher; Anne-Kathrin Mausberg; Kim Quasthoff; Corinna Zimmermann; Hans-Peter Hartung; Axel Methner
Journal:  J Neuroinflammation       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 8.322

8.  Reduction of CD8(+) T lymphocytes in multiple sclerosis patients treated with dimethyl fumarate.

Authors:  Collin M Spencer; Elizabeth C Crabtree-Hartman; Klaus Lehmann-Horn; Bruce A C Cree; Scott S Zamvil
Journal:  Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm       Date:  2015-02-12

9.  Characterizing absolute lymphocyte count profiles in dimethyl fumarate-treated patients with MS: Patient management considerations.

Authors:  Robert J Fox; Andrew Chan; Ralf Gold; J Theodore Phillips; Krzysztof Selmaj; Ih Chang; Mark Novas; Jitesh Rana; Jing L Marantz
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2016-06
  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  Fingolimod and Dimethyl-Fumarate-Derived Lymphopenia is not Associated with Short-Term Treatment Response and Risk of Infections in a Real-Life MS Population.

Authors:  Giacomo Boffa; Nicolò Bruschi; Maria Cellerino; Caterina Lapucci; Giovanni Novi; Elvira Sbragia; Elisabetta Capello; Antonio Uccelli; Matilde Inglese
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 5.749

2.  Lymphocyte Count and Body Mass Index as Biomarkers of Early Treatment Response in a Multiple Sclerosis Dimethyl Fumarate-Treated Cohort.

Authors:  Alessia Manni; Antonio Iaffaldano; Giuseppe Lucisano; Mariangela D'Onghia; Domenico Maria Mezzapesa; Vincenzo Felica; Pietro Iaffaldano; Maria Trojano; Damiano Paolicelli
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 7.561

3.  Selective Brain Network and Cellular Responses Upon Dimethyl Fumarate Immunomodulation in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Dumitru Ciolac; Felix Luessi; Gabriel Gonzalez-Escamilla; Nabin Koirala; Christian Riedel; Vinzenz Fleischer; Stefan Bittner; Julia Krämer; Sven G Meuth; Muthuraman Muthuraman; Sergiu Groppa
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 7.561

4.  Dimethyl fumarate treatment restrains the antioxidative capacity of T cells to control autoimmunity.

Authors:  Marie Liebmann; Lisanne Korn; Claudia Janoschka; Stefanie Albrecht; Sarah Lauks; Alexander M Herrmann; Andreas Schulte-Mecklenbeck; Nicholas Schwab; Tilman Schneider-Hohendorf; Maria Eveslage; Brigitte Wildemann; Felix Luessi; Stephan Schmidt; Martin Diebold; Stefan Bittner; Catharina C Gross; Stjepana Kovac; Frauke Zipp; Tobias Derfuss; Tanja Kuhlmann; Simone König; Sven G Meuth; Heinz Wiendl; Luisa Klotz
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Ozanimod and Dimethyl Fumarate for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Using Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison.

Authors:  Stanley Cohan; Jinender Kumar; Stella Arndorfer; Xuelian Zhu; Marko Zivkovic; Tom Tencer
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 5.749

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.