| Literature DB >> 28959352 |
Kourosh Maboudi1, Seyedeh Marzieh Hosseini2, Mina Sepahi3, Hashem Yaghoubi1, Shahin Hadadian4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Erythropoietin, as a principal hormone promotes red blood cell production in bone marrow. Varieties of erythropoietin biosimilar are being produced by recombinant DNA technology in cell cultures. The detection or quantifi cation of these molecules are being performed by diff erent methods which some of theme such as Western blot and enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) require specifi c antibodies. High cost, inappropriate shipping (cold chain failures), reduced sensitivity and thus poor detection performance are common pitfalls of using commercial kits for performing immunological tests.Entities:
Keywords: ELISA; Polyclonal antibodies; Protein Precipitation; Sensitivity; Specifi city; erythropoietin
Year: 2017 PMID: 28959352 PMCID: PMC5582253 DOI: 10.15171/ijb.1413
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Biotechnol ISSN: 1728-3043 Impact factor: 1.671
Figure 1The agglutination test for different serum antibody dilutions.
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
| |
| direct | - | + | + | + |
| 1:20 | - | + | + | + |
| 1:40 | - | + | + | + |
| 1:80 | - | + | + | + |
| 1:160 | - | - | + | + |
| 1:320 | - | - | + | + |
| 1:640 | - | - | - | + |
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5Comparison of ELISA results of EPO concentrations using commercial kits and produced antibodies.
| EPO concentrationsin different samples | ||||||||
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 | 11 | 10.3 | 12 | 11.1 | 12.9 | 12 | 13.4 | 12.8 |
| 2 | 21.8 | 22.3 | 20.9 | 21.7 | 23.4 | 22 | 24.5 | 23.3 |
| 3 | 5.1 | 4.7 | 5 | 4.9 | 4.4 | 5 | 5.5 | 5 |
| 4 | 6.2 | 6.9 | 5.8 | 6.3 | 5.3 | 6.2 | 6.3 | 5.9 |
| 5 | 15.5 | 14.8 | 14.2 | 14.8 | 17.5 | 18 | 16.9 | 17.5 |
| 6 | 4.1 | 4.8 | 5.1 | 4.7 | 5.4 | 6.5 | 5 | 5.6 |
| 7 | 25 | 23.9 | 23.5 | 24.1 | 23.1 | 25.5 | 24.1 | 24.2 |
| 8 | 9.1 | 8.5 | 8.7 | 8.8 | 7.5 | 7.2 | 6.1 | 6.9 |
| 9 | 6 | 5.1 | 6.8 | 6 | 4.8 | 4.5 | 3.9 | 4.4 |
| 10 | 3.5 | 3.9 | 3.1 | 3.5 | 5.2 | 5.7 | 6 | 5.6 |
| 11 | 75.2 | 78.2 | 77 | 76.8 | 82 | 79.2 | 80 | 80.4 |
| 12 | 21.2 | 19.5 | 21.1 | 20.6 | 19.1 | 17.8 | 20 | 19 |
| 13a | 169.1 | 161.8 | 162.9 | 164.6 | 155.5 | 150.8 | 158.9 | 155.1 |
| 14 | 13.5 | 14 | 13.5 | 13.7 | 14.1 | 13.8 | 13.1 | 13.7 |
| 15 | 18.9 | 18.2 | 17.8 | 18.3 | 18.2 | 17.3 | 18.9 | 18.1 |
| 16 | 11.9 | 12.5 | 12.3 | 12.2 | 12.3 | 14 | 13.2 | 13.2 |
| 17 | 7.1 | 6.8 | 7.8 | 7.2 | 5.5 | 6.8 | 6.1 | 6.1 |
| 18 | 5.3 | 5.8 | 5 | 5.4 | 4.9 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.5 |
| 19 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.7 |
| 20 | 16.5 | 14.8 | 15.5 | 15.6 | 18.9 | 19.5 | 17.8 | 18.7 |
| 21 | 12.1 | 11 | 12.9 | 12 | 10.5 | 11 | 11.6 | 11 |
| 22 | 9.3 | 8.3 | 8.5 | 8.7 | 11 | 10.2 | 9.7 | 10.3 |
| 23 | 8.6 | 9.5 | 8.1 | 8.7 | 8.8 | 7.9 | 9 | 8.6 |
| 24 | 8.6 | 7.5 | 7.8 | 8 | 7.3 | 7.3 | 8.2 | 7.6 |
| 25 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
a: Concentrated API solution to check the high level detections
Figure 6Comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of commercial kits and antibodies.
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| False Positive (FP) | 0 | 0 |
| True positive (TP) | 24 | 24 |
| False negative (FN) | 0 | 0 |
| True negative (NT) | 1 | 1 |
| Sensitivity and specificity | 100% | 100% |