| Literature DB >> 28959193 |
Eduardo López-Caneda1, Fernando Cadaveira2, Angeles Correas3, Alberto Crego1, Fernando Maestú3,4, Socorro Rodríguez Holguín2.
Abstract
Background: Previous studies have reported anomalous resting brain activity in the electroencephalogram (EEG) of alcoholics, often reflected as increased power in the beta and theta frequency bands. The effects of binge drinking, the most common pattern of excessive alcohol consumption during adolescence and youth, on brain activity at rest is still poorly known. In this study, we sought to assess the pattern of resting-state EEG oscillations in college-aged binge drinkers (BDs).Entities:
Keywords: EEG; adolescence; alcohol; binge drinking; eLORETA; resting state
Year: 2017 PMID: 28959193 PMCID: PMC5604281 DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00168
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Behav Neurosci ISSN: 1662-5153 Impact factor: 3.558
Demographic and drinking characteristics of the control and binge drinking groups.
| 40 (19) | 40 (20) | |
| Age | 18.13 ± 0.33 | 18.10 ± 0.30 |
| Caucasian ethnicity (%) | 100 | 100 |
| Regular tobacco smokers | 1 | 6 |
| Regular use of cannabis | 0 | 0 |
| Age of onset of regular drinking | 16.66 ± 1.05 | 14.70 ± 1.15 |
| Number of drinks in a standard day | 0.48 ± 0.90 | 4.26 ± 2.03 |
| Number of drinks in a drinking episode | 0.95 ± 1.50 | 6.78 ± 4.70 |
| Blood alcohol concentration (BAC) in a drinking day (g/dL) | 0.01 ± 0.02 | 0.17 ± 0.09 |
| BIS-11 total score | 60.58 ± 8.26 | 63.77 ± 9.21 |
| GSI score | 0.31 ± 0.17 | 0.31 ± 0.15 |
| Total AUDIT score | 1.07 ± 1.56 | 7.42 ± 3.36 |
p ≤ 0.05 significant differences between groups.
Summary of the brain areas with significantly higher current density in the beta frequency band during eyes-open resting state in the binge drinking group relative to the control group.
| Temporal Lobe, Fusiform Gyrus | 20 | 30, | −40, | −25 | −3.56 |
| 30, | −40, | −20 | −3.54 | ||
| 30, | −35, | −20 | −3.53 | ||
| 30, | −40, | −25 | −3.52 | ||
| 35, | −35, | −25 | −3.46 | ||
| 30, | −35, | −25 | −3.44 | ||
| 40, | −40, | −25 | −3.26 | ||
| 36 | 40, | −35, | −25 | −3.22 | |
| 45, | −40, | −30 | −3.16 | ||
| 37 | 30, | −35, | −15 | −3.50 | |
| 35, | −40, | −15 | −3.25 | ||
| 30, | −45, | −20 | −3.23 | ||
| 35, | −40, | −10 | −3.13 | ||
| 35, | −45, | −20 | −3.12 | ||
| Limbic Lobe, Parahippocampal Gyrus | 27 | 25, | −35, | −5 | −3.39 |
| 25, | −30, | −10 | −3.24 | ||
| 25, | −30, | −5 | −3.20 | ||
| 20, | −35, | −5 | −3.16 | ||
| 35 | 20, | −35, | −10 | −3.22 | |
| 20, | −35, | −15 | −3.16 | ||
| 36 | 25, | −35, | −15 | −3.47 | |
| 25, | −40, | −15 | −3.41 | ||
| 25, | −35, | −20 | −3.36 | ||
| 25, | −40, | −10 | −3.33 | ||
| 35, | −35, | −15 | −3.25 | ||
| 30, | −30, | −20 | −3.14 | ||
| 37 | 30, | −40, | −15 | −3.44 | |
| 30, | −40, | −10 | −3.32 | ||
Corrected p < 0.05.
Figure 1eLORETA-based statistical non-parametric maps (SnPM), comparing the exact current density values between control and binge drinking subjects during eyes-open resting state. Significantly higher current density (corrected p < 0.05) in the beta (12–30 Hz) frequency band in the binge drinking group relative to control group is shown in blue. L, Left; R, right; A, anterior; P, posterior.
Summary of the brain areas with significantly higher current density in the theta frequency band during eyes-closed resting state in the binge drinking group relative to the control group.
| Occipital Lobe, Cuneus | 17 | 15, | −85, | 5 | −3.36 |
| 10, | −85, | 5 | −3.32 | ||
| 15, | −80, | 10 | −3.20 | ||
| 18 | 15, | −85, | 10 | −3.28 | |
| Occipital Lobe, Lingual Gyrus | 17 | 10, | −95, | −15 | −3.37 |
| 15, | −85, | 0 | 3.35 | ||
| 5, | −90, | −10 | −3.28 | ||
| 15, | −90, | 0 | −3.28 | ||
| 15, | −95, | −15 | −3.22 | ||
| 18 | 5, | −85, | −10 | −3.50 | |
| 5, | −90, | −15 | −3.48 | ||
| 5, | −80, | 0 | −3.40 | ||
| 5, | −85, | −15 | −3.39 | ||
| 5, | −85, | −5 | −3.37 | ||
| 5, | −80, | −10 | −3.36 | ||
| 0, | −90, | −15 | −3.36 | ||
| 10, | −80, | −5 | −3.34 | ||
| −5, | −85, | −15 | −3.34 | ||
| −5, | −80, | −10 | −3.34 | ||
| −5, | −90, | −20 | −3.32 | ||
| 5, | −95, | −15 | −3.31 | ||
| 5, | −90, | −20 | −3.30 | ||
| −10, | −80, | −5 | −3.29 | ||
| 5, | −85, | −10 | −3.29 | ||
| −5, | −95, | −20 | −3.29 | ||
| 10, | −85, | −15 | −3.27 | ||
| −5, | −90, | −15 | −3.26 | ||
| −10, | −80, | −10 | −3.25 | ||
| −10, | −80, | 0 | −3.24 | ||
| 5, | −80, | 5 | −3.24 | ||
| 0, | −80, | 0 | −3.23 | ||
| 10, | −80, | −10 | −3.22 | ||
| −10, | −85, | −15 | −3.22 | ||
| −15, | −80, | 0, | −3.22 | ||
Corrected p < 0.05.
Figure 2eLORETA-based statistical non-parametric maps (SnPM), comparing the exact current density values between control and binge drinking subjects during eyes-closed resting state. Significantly higher current density (corrected p < 0.05) in the theta (4–8 Hz) frequency band in the binge drinking group relative to control group is shown in blue. L, Left; R, right; A, anterior; P, posterior.
Figure 3Three-dimensional eLORETA statistical maps of EEG oscillations showing between-groups differences in beta (right) and theta (left) frequency bands (blue-coded for p < 0.05, corrected for multiple testing).