Literature DB >> 28958825

Evaluation of Different Screening Tools for Predicting Femoral Neck Osteoporosis in Rural South Indian Postmenopausal Women.

Kripa Elizabeth Cherian1, Nitin Kapoor1, Sahana Shetty1, Dukhabandhu Naik1, Nihal Thomas1, Thomas V Paul2.   

Abstract

The measurement of bone mineral density by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan is the "gold standard" for the diagnosis of osteoporosis, which has limited availability in many parts of India. This study was done to assess the diagnostic performance of 6 internationally validated tools (Simple Calculated Osteoporosis Risk Estimation [SCORE], age, bulk, one or never estrogen [ABONE], Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument [ORAI] and Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians [OSTA], Fracture Risk Assessment Tool [FRAX®], and calcaneal quantitative ultrasound [QUS]) for the diagnosis of osteoporosis at the femoral neck (FN). This was a cross-sectional study conducted in 2108 ambulatory South Indian rural postmenopausal women who were assessed with SCORE, ABONE, ORAI, OSTA, and FRAX® tools. QUS was performed in 850 subjects. Bone mineral density was estimated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan at the FN, and sensitivity and specificity were calculated for all tools for predicting FN osteoporosis. The receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed for each tool and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. FN osteoporosis was seen in 27%. The sensitivities of SCORE, ABONE, OSTA, ORAI, FRAX®, and QUS were 91.3%, 91.0%, 88.5%, 81.0%, 72.7%, and 81.9%, and the specificities were 36.0%, 33.5%, 41.7%, 52.0%, 60.5%, and 50.3%, respectively, for the FN osteoporosis. When the receiver operating characteristics were constructed, the AUC was good only for SCORE (0.806), and the performance of the rest was under fair category (0.713-0.766). In our large cohort of rural postmenopausal women, the SCORE screening tool was found to be useful with good sensitivity and good AUC for predicting FN osteoporosis. Thus, this tool may be used in resource-limited countries to screen the population at risk and to enable treating physicians to make appropriate management decisions.
Copyright © 2017 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Osteoporosis; postmenopausal women; risk assessment tools SCORE

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28958825     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2017.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  6 in total

Review 1.  Performance of Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool (OST) in Predicting Osteoporosis-A Review.

Authors:  Shaanthana Subramaniam; Soelaiman Ima-Nirwana; Kok-Yong Chin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Comparison of the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians and the fracture risk assessment tool - FRAX to identify densitometric defined osteoporosis: A discriminatory value analysis in a multi-ethnic female population in Southeast Asia.

Authors:  Manju Chandran; Yun Ann Chin; Kuan Swen Choo; Wan Chen Ang; Xiao Feng Huang; Xiao Ming Liu; Donovan Tay; Tin Kyaw Kyaw Aung; Amin Ali; Win Pa Pa Thu; Susan Logan; Sean Xuexian Yan; Sarath Lekamwasam; Ying Hao
Journal:  Osteoporos Sarcopenia       Date:  2020-04-26

3.  Commentary on Indian Menopause Society Guidelines.

Authors:  Kripa Elizabeth Cherian; Nitin Kapoor; Thomas Vizhalil Paul
Journal:  J Midlife Health       Date:  2020-08-10

Review 4.  Screening Tools for Osteoporosis in India: Where Do We Place Them in Current Clinical Care?

Authors:  Kripa Elizabeth Cherian; Nitin Kapoor; Meeta Meeta; Thomas Vizhalil Paul
Journal:  J Midlife Health       Date:  2022-01-20

5.  Evaluation of community-based screening tools for the early screening of osteoporosis in postmenopausal Vietnamese women.

Authors:  My Hanh Bui; Phuoc Thang Dao; Quynh Long Khuong; Phuong-Anh Le; Thuy-Trang Thi Nguyen; Gia Du Hoang; Tu Hoang Le; Hoai Thu Pham; Hong-Xuyen Thi Hoang; Quang Cuong Le; Xuan Thanh Dao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The Indian Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ISBMR) position statement for the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in adults.

Authors:  Sanjay K Bhadada; Manoj Chadha; Usha Sriram; Rimesh Pal; Thomas V Paul; Rajesh Khadgawat; Ameya Joshi; Beena Bansal; Nitin Kapoor; Anshita Aggarwal; Mahendra K Garg; Nikhil Tandon; Sushil Gupta; Narendra Kotwal; Shriraam Mahadevan; Satinath Mukhopadhyay; Soham Mukherjee; Subhash C Kukreja; Sudhaker D Rao; Ambrish Mithal
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 2.617

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.