Literature DB >> 28958768

Performance of Willem's dental age estimation method in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mohd Yusmiaidil Putera Mohd Yusof1, Ilham Wan Mokhtar2, Sivaprakash Rajasekharan3, Rosanna Overholser4, Luc Martens3.   

Abstract

Through numerous validation and method comparison studies on different populations, the Willems method exhibited a superior accuracy. This article aims to systematically examine how accurate the application of Willems dental age method on children of different age groups and its performance based on various populations and regions. A strategic literature search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE and hand searching were used to identify the studies published up to September 2014 that estimated the dental age using the Willems method (modified Demirjian), with a populations, intervention, comparisons and outcomes (PICO) search strategy using MeSH keywords, focusing on the question: How much Willems method deviates from the chronological age in estimating age in children? Standardized mean differences were calculated for difference of dental age to chronological age by using random effects model. Subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate potential heterogeneity. Of 116 titles retrieved based on the standardized search strategy, only 19 articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria for quantitative analysis. The pooled estimates were separately kept as underestimation (n=7) and overestimation (n=12) of chronological age groups for both genders according to primary studies. On absolute values, females (underestimated by 0.13; 95% CI: 0.09-0.18 and overestimated by 0.27; 95% CI: 0.17-0.36) exhibited better accuracy than males (underestimated by 0.28; 95% CI: 0.14-0.42 and overestimated by 0.33; 95% CI: 0.22-0.44). For comparison purposes, the overall pooled estimate overestimated the age by 0.10 (95% CI: -0.06 to 0.26) and 0.09 (95% CI: -0.09 to 0.19) for males and females, respectively. There was no significant difference between the young and older child in subgroup analysis using omnibus test. The mean age between different regions exhibited no statistically significant. The use of Willems method is appropriate to estimate age in children considering its accuracy among different populations, investigators and age groups.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children; Dental age estimation; Meta-analysis; Willem’s method

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28958768     DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.08.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  7 in total

1.  CBCT in dental age estimation: A systematic review and meta analysis.

Authors:  Rizky Merdietio Boedi; Simon Shepherd; Scheila Mânica; Ademir Franco
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Assessment of dental age estimation methods applied to Brazilian children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ademir Franco; Murilo Navarro de Oliveira; Maria Tereza Campos Vidigal; Cauane Blumenberg; Adriele Alves Pinheiro; Luiz Renato Paranhos
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Applicability of Demirjian's method for dental age estimation in a group of Egyptian children.

Authors:  Amro M Moness Ali; Wael H Ahmed; Nagwa M Khattab
Journal:  BDJ Open       Date:  2019-03-21

4.  Accuracy of advanced deep learning with tensorflow and keras for classifying teeth developmental stages in digital panoramic imaging.

Authors:  Norhasmira Mohammad; Anuar Mikdad Muad; Rohana Ahmad; Mohd Yusmiaidil Putera Mohd Yusof
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 1.930

5.  Age Estimation in Children by the Measurement of Open Apices in Teeth: A Study in the Western Indian Population.

Authors:  Sanjana Manjrekar; Shantanu Deshpande; Farhin Katge; Romi Jain; Tejaswini Ghorpade
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2022-01-30

6.  Validity of age estimation methods and reproducibility of bone/dental maturity indices for chronological age estimation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of validation studies.

Authors:  V Marconi; M Iommi; C Monachesi; A Faragalli; E Skrami; R Gesuita; L Ferrante; F Carle
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Comparative assessment of the Willems dental age estimation methods: a Chinese population-based radiographic study.

Authors:  Jian Wang; Linfeng Fan; Shihui Shen; Meizhi Sui; Jiaxin Zhou; Xiaoyan Yuan; Yiwen Wu; Pingping Zhong; Fang Ji; Jiang Tao
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-09-03       Impact factor: 3.747

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.