Soufiane Boufous1, Julie Hatfield2, Raphael Grzebieta3. 1. School of Aviation, Transport and Road Safety (TARS) Research, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: Soufiane@unsw.edu.au. 2. Transport and Road Safety (TARS) Research, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: J.hatfield@unsw.edu. 3. Transport and Road Safety (TARS) Research, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: R.Grzebieta@unsw.edu.au.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the importance of cycling speed on shared paths to the amenity and safety of users, few studies have systematically measured it, nor examined circumstances surrounding it. METHODS: Speed was measured for 5421 riders who were observed cycling on shared paths across 12 metropolitan and regional locations in Sydney, Australia. Multivariate regression analysis was carried out to examine rider and environmental factors that contribute to riders cycling above the median speed. RESULTS: The study found that observed riders travelled at a median speed of 16km/h (mean 18.4km/h). Nearly 80% of riders travelled at 20km/h or less and 7.8% at speeds of more than 30km/h. Riders were significantly less likely to cycle above the median speed on shared paths that had an average volume of over 20 pedestrians/hour. Riders were significantly more likely to travel above the median speed on paths that had a centreline (OR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.41-2.07), on wider paths (over 3.5m) (OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.12-1.59) and on paths with visual segregation between cyclists and pedestrians. Visual segregation, where cycling and walking areas are differentiated by the type of material or by paint colour used, was the strongest predictor of travelling above median speed on shared paths (OR: 3.9, 95% CI: 3.1-4.8). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that riders adjust their speeds to accommodate pedestrians and path conditions. Path characteristics that support separation from pedestrians may allow relatively higher speeds, and associated amenity, without substantial loss of safety.
BACKGROUND: Despite the importance of cycling speed on shared paths to the amenity and safety of users, few studies have systematically measured it, nor examined circumstances surrounding it. METHODS: Speed was measured for 5421 riders who were observed cycling on shared paths across 12 metropolitan and regional locations in Sydney, Australia. Multivariate regression analysis was carried out to examine rider and environmental factors that contribute to riders cycling above the median speed. RESULTS: The study found that observed riders travelled at a median speed of 16km/h (mean 18.4km/h). Nearly 80% of riders travelled at 20km/h or less and 7.8% at speeds of more than 30km/h. Riders were significantly less likely to cycle above the median speed on shared paths that had an average volume of over 20 pedestrians/hour. Riders were significantly more likely to travel above the median speed on paths that had a centreline (OR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.41-2.07), on wider paths (over 3.5m) (OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.12-1.59) and on paths with visual segregation between cyclists and pedestrians. Visual segregation, where cycling and walking areas are differentiated by the type of material or by paint colour used, was the strongest predictor of travelling above median speed on shared paths (OR: 3.9, 95% CI: 3.1-4.8). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that riders adjust their speeds to accommodate pedestrians and path conditions. Path characteristics that support separation from pedestrians may allow relatively higher speeds, and associated amenity, without substantial loss of safety.
Authors: Margherita Pazzini; Leonardo Cameli; Claudio Lantieri; Valeria Vignali; Giulio Dondi; Thomas Jonsson Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-16 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Pivithuru Kalpana Nanayakkara; Nano Langenheim; Irene Moser; Marcus White Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-23 Impact factor: 3.390