Literature DB >> 28958502

Dacomitinib versus gefitinib as first-line treatment for patients with EGFR-mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (ARCHER 1050): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

Yi-Long Wu1, Ying Cheng2, Xiangdong Zhou3, Ki Hyeong Lee4, Kazuhiko Nakagawa5, Seiji Niho6, Fumito Tsuji7, Rolf Linke8, Rafael Rosell9, Jesus Corral10, Maria Rita Migliorino11, Adam Pluzanski12, Eric I Sbar13, Tao Wang14, Jane Liang White14, Sashi Nadanaciva14, Rickard Sandin15, Tony S Mok16.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dacomitinib is a second-generation, irreversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor. We compared its efficacy and safety with that of the reversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced EGFR-mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
METHODS: In this international, multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 study (ARCHER 1050), we enrolled adults (aged ≥18 years or ≥20 years in Japan and South Korea) with newly diagnosed advanced NSCLC and one EGFR mutation (exon 19 deletion or Leu858Arg) at 71 academic medical centres and university hospitals in seven countries or special administrative regions. We randomly assigned participants (1:1) to receive oral dacomitinib 45 mg/day (in 28-day cycles) or oral gefitinib 250 mg/day (in 28-day cycles) until disease progression or another discontinuation criterion was met. Randomisation, stratified by race and EGFR mutation type, was done with a computer-generated random code assigned by a central interactive web response system. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by masked independent review in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01774721, and is ongoing but no longer recruiting patients.
FINDINGS: Between May 9, 2013, and March 20, 2015, 452 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive dacomitinib (n=227) or gefitinib (n=225). Median duration of follow-up for progression-free survival was 22·1 months (95% CI 20·3-23·9). Median progression-free survival according to masked independent review was 14·7 months (95% CI 11·1-16·6) in the dacomitinib group and 9·2 months (9·1-11·0) in the gefitinib group (hazard ratio 0·59, 95% CI 0·47-0·74; p<0·0001). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were dermatitis acneiform (31 [14%] of 227 patients given dacomitinib vs none of 224 patients given gefitinib), diarrhoea (19 [8%] vs two [1%]), and raised alanine aminotransferase levels (two [1%] vs 19 [8%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in 21 (9%) patients given dacomitinib and in ten (4%) patients given gefitinib. Two treatment-related deaths occurred in the dacomitinib group (one related to untreated diarrhoea and one to untreated cholelithases/liver disease) and one in the gefitinib group (related to sigmoid colon diverticulitis/rupture complicated by pneumonia).
INTERPRETATION: Dacomitinib significantly improved progression-free survival over gefitinib in first-line treatment of patients with EGFR-mutation-positive NSCLC and should be considered as a new treatment option for this population. FUNDING: SFJ Pharmaceuticals Group and Pfizer.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28958502     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30608-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  284 in total

Review 1.  Dacomitinib: First Global Approval.

Authors:  Matt Shirley
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  The evolving first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer harbouring epidermal growth factor receptor mutations.

Authors:  Lore Decoster; Philippe Giron; Sacha Mignon; Jacques De Grève
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-04

3.  First line osimertinib for the treatment of patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

Authors:  Biagio Ricciuti; Rita Chiari
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-04

4.  Dacomitinib in EGFR-positive non-small cell lung cancer: an attractive but broken option.

Authors:  Antonio Passaro; Filippo de Marinis
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-04

5.  Moving osimertinib to first-line: the right "strategy" in the chessboard of epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated non-small cell lung cancer?

Authors:  Francesco Passiglia; Luis E Raez; Christian Rolfo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Adjuvant treatment for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: do we have a major breakthrough?

Authors:  Giandomenico Roviello; Marco Imperatori; Michele Aieta; Francesco Sollitto; Matteo Landriscina
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Osimertinib therapy as first-line treatment before acquiring T790M mutation: from AURA1 trial.

Authors:  Kentaro Ito; Osamu Hataji
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Clinicopathologic Characteristics, Treatment Outcomes, and Acquired Resistance Patterns of Atypical EGFR Mutations and HER2 Alterations in Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Tejas Patil; Rao Mushtaq; Sydney Marsh; Christine Azelby; Miheer Pujara; Kurtis D Davies; Dara L Aisner; William T Purcell; Erin L Schenk; Jose M Pacheco; Paul A Bunn; D Ross Camidge; Robert C Doebele
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.785

Review 9.  Third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Natalie M Andrews Wright; Glenwood D Goss
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2019-11

10.  ERCC1 assessment in upfront treatment with and without cisplatin-based chemotherapy in stage IIIB/IV non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Matthias Villalobos; Piotr Czapiewski; Niels Reinmuth; Jürgen R Fischer; Stefan Andreas; Cornelius Kortsik; Monika Serke; Martin Wolf; Petra Neuser; Alexander Reuss; Philipp A Schnabel; Michael Thomas
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 3.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.