Literature DB >> 28958203

Using implementation tools to design and conduct quality improvement projects for faster and more effective improvement.

John Ovretveit1, Brian Mittman2, Lisa Rubenstein3, David A Ganz3.   

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to enable improvers to use recent knowledge from implementation science to carry out improvement changes more effectively. It also highlights the importance of converting research findings into practical tools and guidance for improvers so as to make research easier to apply in practice. Design/methodology/approach This study provides an illustration of how a quality improvement (QI) team project can make use of recent findings from implementation research so as to make their improvement changes more effective and sustainable. The guidance is based on a review and synthesis of improvement and implementation methods. Findings The paper illustrates how research can help a quality project team in the phases of problem definition and preparation, in design and planning, in implementation, and in sustaining and spreading a QI. Examples of the use of different ideas and methods are cited where they exist. Research limitations/implications The example is illustrative and there is little limited experimental evidence of whether using all the steps and tools in the one approach proposed do enable a quality team to be more effective. Evidence supporting individual guidance proposals is cited where it exists. Practical implications If the steps proposed and illustrated in the paper were followed, it is possible that quality projects could avoid waste by ensuring the conditions they need for success are in place, and sustain and spread improvement changes more effectively. Social implications More patients could benefit more quickly from more effective implementation of proven interventions. Originality/value The paper is the first to describe how improvement and implementation science can be combined in a tangible way that practical improvers can use in their projects. It shows how QI project teams can take advantage of recent advances in improvement and implementation science to make their work more effective and sustainable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical effectiveness; Continuous quality improvement; Evidence-based practice; Improvement models; Quality improvement

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28958203     DOI: 10.1108/IJHCQA-01-2017-0019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Care Qual Assur        ISSN: 0952-6862


  7 in total

Review 1.  Quality Improvement in Health Care: The Role of Psychologists and Psychology.

Authors:  Liza Bonin
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2018-09

2.  Can systematic implementation support improve programme fidelity by improving care providers' perceptions of implementation factors? A cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Miriam Hartveit; Einar Hovlid; John Øvretveit; Jørg Assmus; Gary Bond; Inge Joa; Kristin Heiervang; Bjørn Stensrud; Tordis Sørensen Høifødt; Eva Biringer; Torleif Ruud
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 2.908

Review 3.  Implementation Science is Imperative to the Optimization of Obstetric Care.

Authors:  Rebecca F Hamm; Brian K Iriye; Sindhu K Srinivas
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 3.079

4.  Systematic, Multimethod Assessment of Adaptations Across Four Diverse Health Systems Interventions.

Authors:  Borsika A Rabin; Marina McCreight; Catherine Battaglia; Roman Ayele; Robert E Burke; Paul L Hess; Joseph W Frank; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-04-09

5.  Implementation of Implementation Science Knowledge: The Research-Practice Gap Paradox.

Authors:  Anna Westerlund; Linda Sundberg; Per Nilsen
Journal:  Worldviews Evid Based Nurs       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  Mapping the Status of Healthcare Improvement Science through a Narrative Review in Six European Countries.

Authors:  Manuel Lillo-Crespo; Maria Cristina Sierras-Davó; Alan Taylor; Katrina Ritters; Aimilia Karapostoli
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Building capacity from within: qualitative evaluation of a training program aimed at upskilling healthcare workers in delivering an evidence-based implementation approach.

Authors:  April Morrow; Priscilla Chan; Gabriella Tiernan; Julia Steinberg; Deborah Debono; Luke Wolfenden; Katherine M Tucker; Emily Hogden; Natalie Taylor
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.046

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.