Literature DB >> 28958123

[Psychometric Properties of the German Version of the Suicide Behaviors Questionnaire Revised (SBQ-R)].

Heide Glaesmer1, Nestor D Kapusta2, Tobias Teismann3, Birgit Wagner4, Nina Hallensleben1, Lena Spangenberg1, Thomas Forkmann5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The Suicide Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R) was developed by Osman et al. (2001) to economically assess different aspects of suicidality. It consists of 4 items. There are several critical points concerning item construction: (1) temporal frame (e. g. retrospective vs. prospective) and (2) response labels of item 1 and 3 (e. g. 2 alternatives with the same scoring). Information about psychometric properties of the German version of the SBQ-R were not available until now. The SBQ-R is assumed to be a unidimensional measure and is evaluated using a total score, although its dimensionality has never been tested.
METHODS: The SBQ-R and several measures for convergent validity were assessed in a representative sample of the German general population (N=2497). Convergent validity was tested against symptoms of depression and anxiety (PHQ-4), as well as the core constructs of the Interpersonal Theory of Suicidal Behavior (IPTS) (INQ, ACSS-FAD). Unidimensionality of the SBQ-R was tested using confirmatory factor analysis and intercorrelations with the convergent measures were calculated.
RESULTS: The initial model fit of the unidimensional solution was unsatisfactory. After inclusion of a correlated error term of item 2 and item 4 based on modification indices, the model fit was very good. Moreover the SBQ-R showed satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's α=0.72). With the exception of the ACSS-FAD, all correlations with convergent measures were according to the theoretically proposed expectations.
CONCLUSION: In principle the findings on the psychometric properties justify the use of the SBQ-R, although several critical points concerning item scoring remain unresolved. Moreover, sufficient unidimensional model fit was not possible without including correlated errors. Since suicidality is a frequently assessed construct in suicide research and as an exclusion criterion in clinical studies, it would be desirable to develop an economic, psychometrically sound and compelling instrument for the assessment of the different aspects of suicidality in future. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28958123     DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-118335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol        ISSN: 0937-2032


  5 in total

1.  Mental health of Covid-19 risk groups during the first Covid-19 lockdown in Germany: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Niels Graf; Christine Firk; Daniel Deimel; Thorsten Köhler; Janina Dyba
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 4.135

2.  Chemsex and Mental Health of Men Who Have Sex With Men in Germany.

Authors:  Annette Bohn; Dirk Sander; Thorsten Köhler; Nico Hees; Felix Oswald; Norbert Scherbaum; Daniel Deimel; Henrike Schecke
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 4.157

3.  Sleep disturbances predict active suicidal ideation the next day: an ecological momentary assessment study.

Authors:  Juliane Brüdern; Nina Hallensleben; Inken Höller; Lena Spangenberg; Thomas Forkmann; Dajana Rath; Maria Strauß; Anette Kersting; Heide Glaesmer
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.630

4.  Investigating emotion regulation and social information processing as mechanisms linking adverse childhood experiences with psychosocial functioning in young swiss adults: the FACE epidemiological accelerated cohort study.

Authors:  Jeannette Brodbeck; Salome I R Bötschi; Neela Vetsch; Thomas Berger; Stefanie J Schmidt; Simon Marmet
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2022-04-11

5.  Depression, suicidal ideation and suicide risk in German veterinary medical students compared to the German general population.

Authors:  Nadine Schunter; Heide Glaesmer; Luise Lucht; Mahtab Bahramsoltani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 3.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.