Literature DB >> 28958094

Close Examination of the Bar Removal Procedure: The Surgeons' Voice.

Natalia Alvarez-Garcia1, Laura Ardigo2, Gaston Bellia-Munzon2, Marcelo Martinez-Ferro2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Complications of the Nuss procedure are well known. However, publications about intraoperative and postoperative complications of the bar removal procedure (BRP) are scarce. Are they uncommon, unknown, or underreported? Are we ready to face them?
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the profile of complications of the BRP, risk perception, and preventive actions undertaken by the Chest Wall International Group (CWIG) surgeons.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 14-question online survey was posted to the members of the CWIG from February 1 to 28, 2016. A qualifying question was setup to ensure respondents performed Nuss' procedure/variations. Overall, 96.5% of respondents (n = 116) qualified.
RESULTS: Despite being experts in the field of chest wall surgery 62.5% of respondents had performed ≤ 100 BRP and only 37.5% ≥ 100 BRP. Intraoperative complications: Severe bleeding from the bar tunnel was experienced at least one time by 28% of respondents and other serious complications, even death, were reported by 12%. Major surgical maneuvers to treat complications (sternotomy, thoracotomy, life-support maneuvers) were implemented by 62% of the surgeons who had experienced acute complications. Postoperative complications: Overall they were experienced at least once by 73.5% of surgeons. Wound seroma was the most cited complication (42%), followed by pneumothorax (27.5%). Surprisingly, one in every four surgeons acknowledged not requesting a routine chest X-ray before patient discharge. Complications versus experience: The report of acute complications increased with cumulative experience: Close to 50% for surgeons with < 100 BRP and as high as 100% for surgeons with > 1,000 BRP. Prevention of complications: Although 64% of surgeons defined the BRP as of intermediate/high risk, most of them (61%) do not prepare the operating room accordingly (availability of blood products, cardiac surgical backup, and perfusionist support).
CONCLUSION: BRP complications are being underestimated and underreported. Publications do not reflect the real spectrum of complications, which includes life-threatening conditions, even death. Preoperative planning and preparation of the operating room should not be disregarded. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28958094     DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1606842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0939-7248            Impact factor:   2.191


  4 in total

1.  Complications following metal bar removal after Nuss repair are rare in a duocentric retrospective evaluation.

Authors:  Stephan Rohleder; Andreas C Heydweiller; Tatjana T König; S Tolga Yavuz; Martin Schwind; Christina Oetzmann von Sochaczewski
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 2.003

2.  Current Development of Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum (MIRPE).

Authors:  Frank-Martin Haecker; Thomas Franz Krebs; Kai-Uwe Kleitsch
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-31

3.  Minimization of the complications associated with bar removal after the Nuss procedure in adults.

Authors:  Min-Shiau Hsieh; Shao-Syuan Tong; Bo-Chun Wei; Cheng-Chin Chung; Yeung-Leung Cheng
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 1.637

4.  Nuss bar removal without straightening is a safe technique: a single center experience.

Authors:  Nicky Janssen; Jean H T Daemen; Omar Ashour; Luca van Hulst; Karel W E Hulsewé; Yvonne L J Vissers; Erik R de Loos
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 3.005

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.