Literature DB >> 28957821

Association between mammographic density and tumor marker-defined breast cancer subtypes: a case-control study.

Jinyoung Shin1,2, Jeong Eon Lee3, Hyeon Young Ko1,2, Tuong Linh Nguyen4, Seok Jin Nam3, John Llewelyn Hopper5,4, Yun-Mi Song1,2.   

Abstract

High mammographic density (MD) is the most important risk factor for breast cancer. This study aimed to clarify the relationship between MD and breast cancer subtypes defined by tumor markers. We enrolled 642 women with breast cancer (69% premenopausal) and 1241 controls matched for age and menopausal status. Absolute mammographic dense area (ADA), percent mammographic dense area (PDA), and nondense area were assessed using a computer-assisted thresholding technique. We classified breast cancer cases into four subtypes using information on tumor marker expression such as estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and Cerb2 receptor (HER2); luminal A (ER+ and/or PR+, HER2-), luminal B (ER+ and/or PR+, HER2+), HER2-overexpressing (ER-, PR-, and HER2+), and triple-negative (ER-, PR-, and HER2-). Analysis was carried out using a conditional logistic regression model with adjustment for covariates. ADA and PDA were associated positively with the risk of breast cancer overall. Both ADA and PDA tended to have a positive association with breast cancer with any ER, any PR, or HER2-, but not for HER2+. The risk of luminal A breast cancer increased significantly 1.11 times (95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.23) for ADA and 1.12 times (95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.24) for PDA, estimated per 1 SD of the age and BMI-adjusted MD. However, the risk of breast cancer with luminal B, HER2-overexpressing, and triple-negative subtypes did not differ (P>0.10). Differential associations between MD measures and breast cancer by tumor marker status or tumor marker-defined subtypes were not detected. These findings suggested that the association between MD and breast cancer subtype may be because of other causal pathways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28957821     DOI: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 0959-8278            Impact factor:   2.497


  6 in total

Review 1.  A review of the influence of mammographic density on breast cancer clinical and pathological phenotype.

Authors:  Michael S Shawky; Cecilia W Huo; Kara Britt; Erik W Thompson; Michael A Henderson; Andrew Redfern
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Association of mammographic density measures and breast cancer "intrinsic" molecular subtypes.

Authors:  Geffen Kleinstern; Christopher G Scott; Rulla M Tamimi; Matthew R Jensen; V Shane Pankratz; Kimberly A Bertrand; Aaron D Norman; Daniel W Visscher; Fergus J Couch; Kathleen Brandt; John Shepherd; Fang-Fang Wu; Yunn-Yi Chen; Steven R Cummings; Stacey Winham; Karla Kerlikowske; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Associations between mammographic density and tumor characteristics in Chinese women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Erni Li; Jennifer L Guida; Yuan Tian; Hyuna Sung; Hela Koka; Mengjie Li; Ariane Chan; Han Zhang; Eric Tang; Changyuan Guo; Joseph Deng; Nan Hu; Ning Lu; Gretchen L Gierach; Jing Li; Xiaohong R Yang
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Quantitative Mammographic Density Measurements and Molecular Subtypes in Chinese Women With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Yuan Tian; Jennifer L Guida; Hela Koka; Er-Ni Li; Bin Zhu; Hyuna Sung; Ariane Chan; Han Zhang; Eric Tang; Changyuan Guo; Joseph Deng; Nan Hu; Ning Lu; Gretchen L Gierach; Jing Li; Xiaohong R Yang
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2020-10-13

5.  Relationship of established risk factors with breast cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Anne Marie McCarthy; Tara Friebel-Klingner; Sarah Ehsan; Wei He; Michaela Welch; Jinbo Chen; Despina Kontos; Susan M Domchek; Emily F Conant; Alan Semine; Kevin Hughes; Aditya Bardia; Constance Lehman; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 4.452

6.  Does breast density measured through population-based screening independently increase breast cancer risk in Asian females?

Authors:  Boyoung Park; Hye Mi Cho; Eun Hye Lee; Seunghoon Song; Mina Suh; Kui Son Choi; Bong Joo Kang; Kyungran Ko; Ann Yi; Hae Kyoung Jung; Joo Hee Cha; Jae Kwan Jun
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 4.790

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.