Literature DB >> 28957759

Assessing the utility of TAM, TPB, and UTAUT for advanced driver assistance systems.

Md Mahmudur Rahman1, Mary F Lesch2, William J Horrey2, Lesley Strawderman3.   

Abstract

Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) are intended to enhance driver performance and improve transportation safety. The potential benefits of these technologies, such as reduction in number of crashes, enhancing driver comfort or convenience, decreasing environmental impact, etc., have been acknowledged by transportation safety researchers and federal transportation agencies. Although these systems afford safety advantages, they may also challenge the traditional role of drivers in operating vehicles. Driver acceptance, therefore, is essential for the implementation of these systems into the transportation system. Recognizing the need for research into the factors affecting driver acceptance, this study assessed the utility of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) for modelling driver acceptance in terms of Behavioral Intention to use an ADAS. Each of these models propose a set of factors that influence acceptance of a technology. Data collection was done using two approaches: a driving simulator approach and an online survey approach. In both approaches, participants interacted with either a fatigue monitoring system or an adaptive cruise control system combined with a lane-keeping system. Based on their experience, participants responded to several survey questions to indicate their attitude toward using the ADAS and their perception of its usefulness, usability, etc. A sample of 430 surveys were collected for this study. Results found that all the models (TAM, TPB, and UTAUT) can explain driver acceptance with their proposed sets of factors, each explaining 71% or more of the variability in Behavioral Intention. Among the models, TAM was found to perform the best in modelling driver acceptance followed by TPB. The findings of this study confirm that these models can be applied to ADAS technologies and that they provide a basis for understanding driver acceptance.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Driver acceptability; Driver attitude; Driver behavior; Intelligent transport systems; Vehicle automation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28957759     DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.09.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  11 in total

1.  Factors Influencing Residents' Behavior in Internet Recycling: From the Perspective of the Adoption of New Technology.

Authors:  Tingting Liu; Zichen Zheng; Zhichao Wen; Shangyun Wu; Yaru Liu; Jing Cao; Zhixiong Weng
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Preferred Sources of Information, Knowledge, and Acceptance of Automated Vehicle Systems: Effects of Gender and Age.

Authors:  Pamela M Greenwood; Carryl L Baldwin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-23

3.  Evaluating the Intention and Behaviour of Private Sector Participation in Healthcare Service Delivery via Public-Private Partnership: Evidence from China.

Authors:  Jie Yang; Lingchuan Song; Xiaoyi Yao; Qian Cheng; Zichao Cheng; Ke Xu
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 2.682

4.  Method-oriented systematic review on the simple scale for acceptance measurement in advanced transport telematics.

Authors:  Jan C Zoellick; Adelheid Kuhlmey; Liane Schenk; Stefan Blüher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Autonomous delivery vehicles to fight the spread of Covid-19 - How do men and women differ in their acceptance?

Authors:  Sebastian Kapser; Mahmoud Abdelrahman; Tobias Bernecker
Journal:  Transp Res Part A Policy Pract       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  Drivers' Intentions to Use Different Functionalities of Conditionally Automated Cars: A Survey Study of 18,631 Drivers from 17 Countries.

Authors:  Tyron Louw; Ruth Madigan; Yee Mun Lee; Sina Nordhoff; Esko Lehtonen; Satu Innamaa; Fanny Malin; Afsane Bjorvatn; Natasha Merat
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Effects of Psychological Factors on Modal Shift from Car to Dockless Bike Sharing: A Case Study of Nanjing, China.

Authors:  Xinwei Ma; Ruiming Cao; Jianbiao Wang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Driving Performance and Technology Acceptance Evaluation in Real Traffic of a Smartphone-Based Driver Assistance System.

Authors:  Gheorghe-Daniel Voinea; Cristian Cezar Postelnicu; Mihai Duguleana; Gheorghe-Leonte Mogan; Radu Socianu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Identifying Cognitive Mechanism Underlying Situation Awareness of Pilots' Unsafe Behaviors Using Quantitative Modeling.

Authors:  Shaoqi Jiang; Weijiong Chen; Yutao Kang; Jiahao Liu; Wanglai Kuang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  The effect of perceived risks and perceived cost on using online learning by high school students.

Authors:  Samiaji Sarosa
Journal:  Procedia Comput Sci       Date:  2022-01-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.